These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34150451)

  • 1. Analyzing Consequence Variables Within the High-Probability Instructional Sequence for a Child Diagnosed With CHARGE Syndrome.
    Davis CR; Axe JB
    Behav Anal Pract; 2021 Jun; 14(2):352-359. PubMed ID: 34150451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Further evaluation of the high-probability instructional sequence with and without programmed reinforcement.
    Wilder DA; Majdalany L; Sturkie L; Smeltz L
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):511-22. PubMed ID: 25998741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the high-probability instructional sequence to increase compliance with multiple low-probability instructions among children with autism.
    Rosales MK; Wilder DA; Montalvo M; Fagan B
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Apr; 54(2):760-769. PubMed ID: 33029788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Various High-Probability to Low-Probability Instruction Ratios During the Use of the High-Probability Instructional Sequence.
    Ertel H; Wilder DA; Hodges A; Hurtado L
    Behav Modif; 2019 Sep; 43(5):639-655. PubMed ID: 29902925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of high-p and low-p instruction similarity on compliance among young children.
    Lipschultz JL; Wilder DA; Ertel H; Enderli A
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Oct; 51(4):866-878. PubMed ID: 29911333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recent research on the high-probability instructional sequence: A brief review.
    Lipschultz J; Wilder DA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Apr; 50(2):424-428. PubMed ID: 28177117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A developmental analysis of rule-following.
    Riegler HC; Baer DM
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 1989; 21():191-219. PubMed ID: 2665430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the high-probability instruction sequence with and without programmed reinforcement for compliance with high-probability instructions.
    Zuluaga CA; Normand MP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(3):453-7. PubMed ID: 18816986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of reinforcement and response-cost history on instructional control.
    Nergaard SK; Couto KC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 May; 115(3):679-701. PubMed ID: 33634471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method to establish stimulus control and compliance with instructions.
    Borgen JG; Charles Mace F; Cavanaugh BM; Shamlian K; Lit KR; Wilson JB; Trauschke SL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Oct; 50(4):830-842. PubMed ID: 28940482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Momentum and extinction effects on self-injurious escape behavior and noncompliance.
    Zarcone JR; Iwata BA; Mazaleski JL; Smith RG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(4):649-58. PubMed ID: 7844056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An analysis of stimuli that influence compliance during the high-probability instruction sequence.
    Normand MP; Kestner K; Jessel J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010; 43(4):735-8. PubMed ID: 21541158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Teachers' instructions and children's compliance in preschool classrooms: a descriptive analysis.
    Atwater JB; Morris EK
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1988; 21(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 3417579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A preliminary comparison of guided compliance and high-probability instructional sequences as treatment for noncompliance in children with developmental disabilities.
    Smith MR; Lerman DC
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(3):183-95. PubMed ID: 10372411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using progressive ratio schedules to evaluate tokens as generalized conditioned reinforcers.
    Russell D; Ingvarsson ET; Haggar JL; Jessel J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 29193060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Practitioner Model for Increasing Eye Contact in Children With Autism.
    Cook JL; Rapp JT; Mann KR; McHugh C; Burji C; Nuta R
    Behav Modif; 2017 May; 41(3):382-404. PubMed ID: 28129704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Quality of Instructional YouTube Videos for the Administration of Intranasal Spray: Observational Study.
    Peters-Geven MM; Rollema C; Metting EI; van Roon EN; de Vries TW
    JMIR Med Educ; 2020 Dec; 6(2):e23668. PubMed ID: 33377873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does Replacing Live Demonstration With Instructional Videos Improve Student Satisfaction and Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Examination Performance?
    Seals R; Gustowski SM; Kominski C; Li F
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2016 Nov; 116(11):726-734. PubMed ID: 27802558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Praising child compliance: reinforcement or ritual?
    Roberts MW
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 1985 Dec; 13(4):611-29. PubMed ID: 4078190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of the High-Probability Instructional Sequence in Children With Feeding Disorders: A Synthesis.
    Silbaugh BC; Calderon GA; Eslava VH
    Behav Modif; 2020 Nov; 44(6):927-954. PubMed ID: 31253052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.