268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34151502)
1. Evaluation of 4-Hz log files and secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation as patient-specific quality assurance for VMAT prostate plans.
Szeverinski P; Kowatsch M; Künzler T; Meinschad M; Clemens P; DeVries AF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 22(7):235-244. PubMed ID: 34151502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a secondary dose check tool against Monte Carlo and analytical clinical dose calculation algorithms in VMAT.
Piffer S; Casati M; Marrazzo L; Arilli C; Calusi S; Desideri I; Fusi F; Pallotta S; Talamonti C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Apr; 22(4):52-62. PubMed ID: 33735491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT.
Agnew CE; Irvine DM; McGarry CK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):4994. PubMed ID: 25493524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of a GATE Monte Carlo platform in a clinical pretreatment QA system for VMAT treatment plans using TrueBeam with an HD120 multileaf collimator.
Lee B; Jeong S; Chung K; Yoon M; Park HC; Han Y; Jung SH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):101-110. PubMed ID: 31544350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A structured FMEA approach to optimizing combinations of plan-specific quality assurance techniques for IMRT and VMAT QA.
O'Daniel JC; Giles W; Cui Y; Adamson J
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5387-5397. PubMed ID: 37475493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Machine Log File and Calibration Errors-based Patient-specific Quality Assurance (QA) for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT).
Ma Y; Mou X; Beeraka NM; Guo Y; Liu J; Dai J; Fan R
Curr Pharm Des; 2023; 29(34):2738-2751. PubMed ID: 37916622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical implementation of a log file-based machine and patient QA system for IMRT and VMAT treatment plans.
Silvestri V; Raspanti D; Guerrisi MG; Falco MD
Phys Med; 2023 Apr; 108():102570. PubMed ID: 36989974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cross verification of independent dose recalculation, log files based, and phantom measurement-based pretreatment quality assurance for volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Han C; Yi J; Zhu K; Zhou Y; Ai Y; Zheng X; Xie C; Jin X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 21(11):98-104. PubMed ID: 33001540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Using Monte Carlo Dose Calculation and Elekta Log Files for Prostate Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy.
Katsuta Y; Kadoya N; Fujita Y; Shimizu E; Matsunaga K; Sawada K; Matsushita H; Majima K; Jingu K
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 16(6):1220-1225. PubMed ID: 29334027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement comparison and Monte Carlo analysis for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery verification using the ArcCHECK dosimetry system.
Lin MH; Koren S; Veltchev I; Li J; Wang L; Price RA; Ma CM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(2):3929. PubMed ID: 23470927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of independent dose calculation followed by machine log file analysis against conventional measurement based IMRT QA.
Sun B; Rangaraj D; Boddu S; Goddu M; Yang D; Palaniswaamy G; Yaddanapudi S; Wooten O; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 13(5):3837. PubMed ID: 22955649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Error sensitivity of a log file analysis tool compared with a helical diode array dosimeter for VMAT delivery quality assurance.
Szeverinski P; Kowatsch M; Künzler T; Meinschad M; Clemens P; DeVries AF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 21(11):163-171. PubMed ID: 33095978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of machine log files/MC-based treatment planning and delivery QA as compared to ArcCHECK QA.
Stanhope CW; Drake DG; Liang J; Alber M; Söhn M; Habib C; Willcut V; Yan D
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):2864-2874. PubMed ID: 29676463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.
Vikraman S; Manigandan D; Karrthick KP; Sambasivaselli R; Senniandavar V; Ramu M; Rajesh T; Lutz M; Muthukumaran M; Karthikeyan N; Tejinder K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5128. PubMed ID: 25679152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commissioning and clinical implementation of the first commercial independent Monte Carlo 3D dose calculation to replace CyberKnife M6™ patient-specific QA measurements.
Milder MTW; Alber M; Söhn M; Hoogeman MS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 21(11):304-311. PubMed ID: 33103343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing measurement-derived (3DVH) and machine log file-derived dose reconstruction methods for VMAT QA in patient geometries.
Tyagi N; Yang K; Yan D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4645. PubMed ID: 25207396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monte Carlo simulation-based patient-specific QA using machine log files for line-scanning proton radiation therapy.
Jeon C; Lee J; Shin J; Cheon W; Ahn S; Jo K; Han Y
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7139-7153. PubMed ID: 37756652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
