These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34151683)

  • 1. Second trimester cerebroplacental ratio versus umbilicocerebral ratio for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes.
    Winchester ML; McCarther N; Cancino D; Fitzgerald S; Parrish M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):7929-7935. PubMed ID: 34151683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.
    Akolekar R; Ciobanu A; Zingler E; Syngelaki A; Nicolaides KH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 221(1):65.e1-65.e18. PubMed ID: 30878322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between cerebroplacental ratio and umbilicocerebral ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome at term.
    Di Mascio D; Rizzo G; Buca D; D'Amico A; Leombroni M; Tinari S; Giancotti A; Muzii L; Nappi L; Liberati M; D'Antonio F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Sep; 252():439-443. PubMed ID: 32763648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between Cerebroplacental Ratio and Umbilicocerebral Ratio in Predicting Adverse Perinatal Outcome in Pregnancies Complicated by Late Fetal Growth Restriction: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.
    Di Mascio D; Herraiz I; Villalain C; Buca D; Morales-Rosello J; Loscalzo G; Sileo FG; Finarelli A; Bertucci E; Facchinetti F; Rizzo G; Brunelli R; Giancotti A; Muzii L; Maruotti GM; Carbone L; D'Amico A; Tinari S; Morelli R; Cerra C; Nappi L; Greco P; Liberati M; Galindo A; D'Antonio F
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2021; 48(6):448-456. PubMed ID: 34130275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic performance of cerebroplacental and umbilicocerebral ratio in appropriate for gestational age and late growth restricted fetuses attempting vaginal delivery: a multicenter, retrospective study.
    Villalain C; Galindo A; Di Mascio D; Buca D; Morales-Rosello J; Loscalzo G; Giulia Sileo F; Finarelli A; Bertucci E; Facchinetti F; Rizzo G; Brunelli R; Giancotti A; Muzii L; Maruotti GM; Carbone L; D'Amico A; Tinari S; Morelli R; Cerra C; Nappi L; Greco P; Liberati M; D'Antonio F; Herraiz I
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):6853-6859. PubMed ID: 34102939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the cerebro-placental to umbilico-cerebral Doppler ratios for the prediction of adverse neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction.
    Leavitt K; Odibo L; Nwosu O; Odibo AO
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):5904-5908. PubMed ID: 33820478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Doppler ultrasound of umbilical and middle cerebral artery in third trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses to decide on timing of delivery for suspected fetal growth restriction: A cohort with nested RCT (DRIGITAT).
    Marijnen MC; Kamphof HD; Damhuis SE; Smies M; Leemhuis AG; Wolf H; Gordijn SJ; Ganzevoort W;
    BJOG; 2024 Jul; 131(8):1042-1053. PubMed ID: 38498267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of umbilicocerebral and cerebroplacental ratios in prediction of perinatal outcome in FGR pregnancies.
    Coenen H; Braun J; Köster H; Möllers M; Schmitz R; Steinhard J; Oelmeier K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Jun; 305(6):1383-1392. PubMed ID: 34599678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal cerebral blood-flow redistribution: analysis of Doppler reference charts and association of different thresholds with adverse perinatal outcome.
    Wolf H; Stampalija T; Lees CC;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 58(5):705-715. PubMed ID: 33599336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of Cerebroplacental Ratio in Predicting the Outcome of Pregnancies Complicated by Diabetes.
    Cardinali F; Panunzi C; D'Antonio F; Khalil A; Spinillo A; Arossa A; Familiari A; Pagani G; Resta S; Rizzo G
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2024; 51(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 37926070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cerebroplacental ratio assessment in early labor in uncomplicated term pregnancy and prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: prospective multicenter study.
    Dall'Asta A; Ghi T; Rizzo G; Cancemi A; Aloisio F; Arduini D; Pedrazzi G; Figueras F; Frusca T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):481-487. PubMed ID: 29900608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of ductus venosus Doppler and cerebroplacental ratio for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in high-risk pregnancies before and after 34 weeks.
    Morales-Roselló J; Bhate R; Eltaweel N; Khalil A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Jul; 102(7):891-904. PubMed ID: 37173867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is middle cerebral artery Doppler related to neonatal and 2-year infant outcome in early fetal growth restriction?
    Stampalija T; Arabin B; Wolf H; Bilardo CM; Lees C;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):521.e1-521.e13. PubMed ID: 28087423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex-specific reference ranges of cerebroplacental and umbilicocerebral ratios: longitudinal study.
    Acharya G; Ebbing C; Karlsen HO; Kiserud T; Rasmussen S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 56(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 31503378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study protocol for a randomized trial on timely delivery versus expectant management in late preterm small for gestational age pregnancies with an abnormal umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR): the DRIGITAT study.
    Smies M; Damhuis SE; Duijnhoven RG; Leemhuis AG; Gordijn SJ; Ganzevoort W
    Trials; 2022 Aug; 23(1):619. PubMed ID: 35915472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An abnormal cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) is predictive of early childhood delayed neurodevelopment in the setting of fetal growth restriction.
    Monteith C; Flood K; Pinnamaneni R; Levine TA; Alderdice FA; Unterscheider J; McAuliffe FM; Dicker P; Tully EC; Malone FD; Foran A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):273.e1-273.e9. PubMed ID: 31226291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is cerebroplacental ratio a marker of impaired fetal growth velocity and adverse pregnancy outcome?
    Khalil A; Morales-Rosello J; Khan N; Nath M; Agarwal P; Bhide A; Papageorghiou A; Thilaganathan B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 216(6):606.e1-606.e10. PubMed ID: 28189607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnitude of change in fetal cerebroplacental ratio in third trimester and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome.
    Flatley C; Greer RM; Kumar S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):514-519. PubMed ID: 27873370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by cerebroplacental ratio in women undergoing induction of labor.
    Fiolna M; Kostiv V; Anthoulakis C; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):473-480. PubMed ID: 30426578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the fetal cerebroplacental ratio better that the estimated fetal weight in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in a low risk cohort?
    Flatley C; Kumar S
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Jul; 32(14):2380-2386. PubMed ID: 29455616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.