These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34152696)

  • 1. Familiarity and Mate Preference Assessment with the Partner Preference Test.
    Beery AK
    Curr Protoc; 2021 Jun; 1(6):e173. PubMed ID: 34152696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of dopamine signaling in prairie vole peer relationships.
    Lee NS; Beery AK
    Horm Behav; 2021 Jan; 127():104876. PubMed ID: 33152338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative role of reward in long-term peer and mate relationships in voles.
    Goodwin NL; Lopez SA; Lee NS; Beery AK
    Horm Behav; 2019 May; 111():70-77. PubMed ID: 30528833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Social selectivity and social motivation in voles.
    Beery AK; Lopez SA; Blandino KL; Lee NS; Bourdon NS
    Elife; 2021 Nov; 10():. PubMed ID: 34726153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Specificity in Sociality: Mice and Prairie Voles Exhibit Different Patterns of Peer Affiliation.
    Beery AK; Christensen JD; Lee NS; Blandino KL
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2018; 12():50. PubMed ID: 29615879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer Social Environment Impacts Behavior and Dopamine D1 Receptor Density in Prairie Voles (Microtus ochrogaster).
    Lee NS; Kim CY; Beery AK
    Neuroscience; 2023 Apr; 515():62-70. PubMed ID: 36796749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How prior pair-bonding experience affects future bonding behavior in monogamous prairie voles.
    Harbert KJ; Pellegrini M; Gordon KM; Donaldson ZR
    Horm Behav; 2020 Nov; 126():104847. PubMed ID: 32910950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prolonged partner separation erodes nucleus accumbens transcriptional signatures of pair bonding in male prairie voles.
    Sadino JM; Bradeen XG; Kelly CJ; Brusman LE; Walker DM; Donaldson ZR
    Elife; 2023 Feb; 12():. PubMed ID: 36852906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Affiliation, Aggression, and Selectivity of Peer Relationships in Meadow and Prairie Voles.
    Lee NS; Goodwin NL; Freitas KE; Beery AK
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2019; 13():52. PubMed ID: 30941022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of peptides on partner preference formation are predicted by habitat in prairie voles.
    Cushing BS; Martin JO; Young LJ; Carter CS
    Horm Behav; 2001 Feb; 39(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 11161883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative Assessment of Familiarity/Novelty Preferences in Rodents.
    Beery AK; Shambaugh KL
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2021; 15():648830. PubMed ID: 33927601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex differences in the reward value of familiar mates in prairie voles.
    Vahaba DM; Halstead ER; Donaldson ZR; Ahern TH; Beery AK
    Genes Brain Behav; 2022 Mar; 21(3):e12790. PubMed ID: 35044087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of a D2 receptor antagonist on repeated pair bond formation in the male prairie vole.
    Herschberger MR; Perkeybile AM
    Horm Behav; 2022 May; 141():105149. PubMed ID: 35248868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Activation of μ-opioid receptors in the dorsal striatum is necessary for adult social attachment in monogamous prairie voles.
    Burkett JP; Spiegel LL; Inoue K; Murphy AZ; Young LJ
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2011 Oct; 36(11):2200-10. PubMed ID: 21734650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A gender-specific mechanism for pair bonding: oxytocin and partner preference formation in monogamous voles.
    Insel TR; Hulihan TJ
    Behav Neurosci; 1995 Aug; 109(4):782-9. PubMed ID: 7576222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of two automated metrics for analyzing partner preference tests.
    Ahern TH; Modi ME; Burkett JP; Young LJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Sep; 182(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 19539647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of partner preferences in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): the role of social and sexual experience.
    Williams JR; Catania KC; Carter CS
    Horm Behav; 1992 Sep; 26(3):339-49. PubMed ID: 1398553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Female degus show high sociality but no preference for familiar peers.
    Insel N; Shambaugh KL; Beery AK
    Behav Processes; 2020 May; 174():104102. PubMed ID: 32145271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can a traditional partner preference test quantify monogamous behavior in captive coyotes?
    Turano A; Brummer SP; Young JK; Freeman SM
    Behav Processes; 2023 Mar; 206():104832. PubMed ID: 36693577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intracerebral Delivery of an OTR Antagonist and Subsequent Behavioral Testing in Prairie Voles.
    Hirota Y; Otsuki C; Kamura E; Mitsui S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2384():257-269. PubMed ID: 34550580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.