289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34153165)
1. Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.
McCarron TL; Clement F; Rasiah J; Moran C; Moffat K; Gonzalez A; Wasylak T; Santana M
Health Expect; 2021 Aug; 24(4):1378-1390. PubMed ID: 34153165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids.
Parry M; Bjørnnes AK; Toupin-April K; Najam A; Wells D; Sivakumar A; Richards DP; Ceroni T; Park M; Ellis AK; Gilron I; Marlin S
Patient; 2020 Dec; 13(6):745-756. PubMed ID: 33026639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research: A participatory qualitative study.
Béland S; Lambert M; Delahunty-Pike A; Howse D; Schwarz C; Chouinard MC; Aubrey-Bassler K; Burge F; Doucet S; Danish A; Dumont-Samson O; Bisson M; Luke A; Macdonald M; Gaudreau A; Porter J; Rubenstein D; Sabourin V; Scott C; Warren M; Wilhelm L; Hudon C
Health Expect; 2022 Oct; 25(5):2365-2376. PubMed ID: 35593113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Researchers' experiences with patient engagement in health research: a scoping review and thematic synthesis.
Pratte MM; Audette-Chapdelaine S; Auger AM; Wilhelmy C; Brodeur M
Res Involv Engagem; 2023 Apr; 9(1):22. PubMed ID: 37038164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Future directions for patient engagement in research: a participatory workshop with Canadian patient partners and academic researchers.
Chudyk AM; Stoddard R; Duhamel TA; ; Schultz ASH
Health Res Policy Syst; 2024 Feb; 22(1):24. PubMed ID: 38350974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient-Oriented Research Competencies in Health (PORCH) for patients, healthcare providers, decision-makers and researchers: protocol of a scoping review.
Mallidou AA; Frisch N; Doyle-Waters MM; MacLeod MLP; Ward J; Atherton P
Syst Rev; 2018 Jul; 7(1):101. PubMed ID: 30025543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review.
Frisch N; Atherton P; Doyle-Waters MM; MacLeod MLP; Mallidou A; Sheane V; Ward J; Woodley J
Res Involv Engagem; 2020; 6():4. PubMed ID: 32055415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The experience of patient partners in research: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.
Lauzon-Schnittka J; Audette-Chapdelaine S; Boutin D; Wilhelmy C; Auger AM; Brodeur M
Res Involv Engagem; 2022 Oct; 8(1):55. PubMed ID: 36192817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient partners' perspectives of meaningful engagement in synthesis reviews: A patient-oriented rapid review.
Boden C; Edmonds AM; Porter T; Bath B; Dunn K; Gerrard A; Goodridge D; Stobart C
Health Expect; 2021 Aug; 24(4):1056-1071. PubMed ID: 34048618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Engaging policy-makers, health system managers, and policy analysts in the knowledge synthesis process: a scoping review.
Tricco AC; Zarin W; Rios P; Nincic V; Khan PA; Ghassemi M; Diaz S; Pham B; Straus SE; Langlois EV
Implement Sci; 2018 Feb; 13(1):31. PubMed ID: 29433543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Applying Patient and Public Involvement in preclinical research: A co-created scoping review.
Carroll P; Dervan A; Maher A; McCarthy C; Woods I; Kavanagh R; Beirne C; Harte G; O'Flynn D; O'Connor C; McGuire T; Leahy LM; Gonzalez JG; Stasiewicz M; Maughan J; Gouveia PJ; Murphy PJ; Quinlan J; Casey S; Holton A; Smith É; Moriarty F; O'Brien FJ; Flood M
Health Expect; 2022 Dec; 25(6):2680-2699. PubMed ID: 36217557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to engage patient partners in health service research: a scoping review protocol.
Tscherning SC; Bekker HL; Vedelø TW; Finderup J; Rodkjær LØ
Res Involv Engagem; 2021 Apr; 7(1):20. PubMed ID: 33902753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences.
Chudyk AM; Stoddard R; McCleary N; Duhamel TA; Shimmin C; Hickes S; Schultz ASH
Res Involv Engagem; 2022 Aug; 8(1):44. PubMed ID: 36038887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding patient engagement in health system decision-making: a co-designed scoping review.
McCarron TL; Moffat K; Wilkinson G; Zelinsky S; Boyd JM; White D; Hassay D; Lorenzetti DL; Marlett NJ; Noseworthy T
Syst Rev; 2019 Apr; 8(1):97. PubMed ID: 30999950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Co-building a training programme to facilitate patient, family and community partnership on research grants: A patient-oriented research project.
Nielssen I; Ahmed S; Zelinsky S; Dompe B; Fairie P; Santana MJ
Health Expect; 2023 Aug; 26(4):1584-1595. PubMed ID: 37078644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The power of language: how to bridge the gap between healthcare research and patients - a scoping review.
Dews SA; Daley R; Bansal A; Preston J; Bohm N
Curr Med Res Opin; 2024 Feb; 40(2):279-291. PubMed ID: 38131338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A scoping review of methods to measure and evaluate citizen engagement in health research.
Shahid A; Lalani IN; Rosgen BK; Sept BG; Longmore S; Parsons Leigh J; Stelfox HT; Fiest KM
Res Involv Engagem; 2022 Dec; 8(1):72. PubMed ID: 36496455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Co-designing strategies to support patient partners during a scoping review and reflections on the process: a commentary.
McCarron TL; Clement F; Rasiah J; Moffat K; Wasylak T; Santana MJ
Res Involv Engagem; 2021 May; 7(1):25. PubMed ID: 33971974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.
Hoekstra F; Mrklas KJ; Khan M; McKay RC; Vis-Dunbar M; Sibley KM; Nguyen T; Graham ID; ; Gainforth HL
Health Res Policy Syst; 2020 May; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 32450919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
