BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34154558)

  • 1. The concordance in lesion detection and characteristics between the Anatomical Intelligence and conventional breast ultrasound Scan method.
    Li J; Wang H; Wang L; Wei T; Wu M; Li T; Liao J; Tan B; Lu M
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Jun; 21(1):102. PubMed ID: 34154558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement in breast lesion assessment and final BI-RADS classification between radial and meander-like breast ultrasound.
    Brasier-Lutz P; Jäggi-Wickes C; Schaedelin S; Burian R; Schoenenberger CA; Zanetti-Dällenbach R
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Jun; 21(1):104. PubMed ID: 34157997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency and impact factors of anatomical intelligence for breast and hand-held ultrasound in lesion detection.
    Dai C; Bao L; Yan H; Zhu L; Xu X; Tan Y; Yu L; Yang J; Jiang C; Shen Y
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2023; 51(6):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 37096417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the BI-RADS categorization of breast lesions: A pilot head to head comparison study in screening program.
    Huang X; Qiu Y; Bao F; Wang J; Lin C; Lin Y; Wu J; Yang H
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1098639. PubMed ID: 36743185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The image quality and lesion characterization of breast using automated whole-breast ultrasound: A comparison with handheld ultrasound.
    An YY; Kim SH; Kang BJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1232-5. PubMed ID: 25975896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of automated versus hand-held breast US in supplemental screening in asymptomatic women with dense breasts: is there a difference regarding woman preference, lesion detection and lesion characterization?
    Tutar B; Esen Icten G; Guldogan N; Kara H; Arıkan AE; Tutar O; Uras C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 May; 301(5):1257-1265. PubMed ID: 32215718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS): reproducibility of mass localization, size measurement, and characterization on serial examinations.
    Chang JM; Cha JH; Park JS; Kim SJ; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Oct; 56(10):1163-70. PubMed ID: 25280476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) in assessing breast cancer size: A comparison with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Girometti R; Zanotel M; Londero V; Linda A; Lorenzon M; Zuiani C
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Mar; 28(3):1000-1008. PubMed ID: 29018952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Volume Scanning (ABVS) Compared to Handheld Ultrasonography With Breast MRI as the Gold Standard.
    Schmachtenberg C; Fischer T; Hamm B; Bick U
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):954-961. PubMed ID: 28336007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
    Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
    Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Observer agreement using the ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-ultrasound, First Edition (2003).
    Park CS; Lee JH; Yim HW; Kang BJ; Kim HS; Jung JI; Jung NY; Kim SH
    Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(5):397-402. PubMed ID: 17923782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical Utility of Real-Time MR-Navigated Ultrasound with Supine Breast MRI for Suspicious Enhancing Lesions Not Identified on Second-Look Ultrasound.
    Kang DK; Jung Y; Han S; Kim JY; Kim TH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 43(2):412-420. PubMed ID: 27780660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of ultrasound artificial intelligence in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions of BI-RADS 4A.
    Niu S; Huang J; Li J; Liu X; Wang D; Zhang R; Wang Y; Shen H; Qi M; Xiao Y; Guan M; Liu H; Li D; Liu F; Wang X; Xiong Y; Gao S; Wang X; Zhu J
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Oct; 20(1):959. PubMed ID: 33008320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography and the ultrasound BI-RADS lexicon of breast lesions.
    Park CS; Kim SH; Jung NY; Choi JJ; Kang BJ; Jung HS
    Breast Cancer; 2015 Mar; 22(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 23584596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performance.
    Li DD; Xu HX; Guo LH; Bo XW; Li XL; Wu R; Xu JM; Zhang YF; Zhang K
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3290-300. PubMed ID: 26714967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Usefulness of combined BI-RADS analysis and Nakagami statistics of ultrasound echoes in the diagnosis of breast lesions.
    Dobruch-Sobczak K; Piotrzkowska-Wróblewska H; Roszkowska-Purska K; Nowicki A; Jakubowski W
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Apr; 72(4):339.e7-339.e15. PubMed ID: 28038779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A role for breast ultrasound Artificial Intelligence decision support in the evaluation of small invasive lobular carcinomas.
    Amir T; Coffey K; Sevilimedu V; Fardanesh R; Mango VL
    Clin Imaging; 2023 Sep; 101():77-85. PubMed ID: 37311398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of an automated breast volume scanner according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS for breast ultrasound compared with hand-held ultrasound.
    Choi EJ; Choi H; Park EH; Song JS; Youk JH
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():138-145. PubMed ID: 29362145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Supine breast US: how to correlate breast lesions from prone MRI.
    Telegrafo M; Rella L; Stabile Ianora AA; Angelelli G; Moschetta M
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1059):20150497. PubMed ID: 26689093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imaging Phenotypes in Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer on Mammography, Ultrasound, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using the Fifth Edition of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
    Marino MA; Riedl CC; Bernathova M; Bernhart C; Baltzer PAT; Helbich TH; Pinker K
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():150-159. PubMed ID: 30150038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.