These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34154574)

  • 1. Assessing research misconduct in Iran: a perspective from Iranian medical faculty members.
    Shamsoddin E; Torkashvand-Khah Z; Sofi-Mahmudi A; Janani L; Kabiri P; Shamsi-Gooshki E; Mesgarpour B
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Jun; 22(1):74. PubMed ID: 34154574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychometric properties of Persian version of the research misconduct questionnaire (PRMQ).
    Shamsoddin E; Janani L; Ghamari K; Kabiri P; Shamsi Gooshki E; Mesgarpour B
    J Med Ethics Hist Med; 2020; 13():18. PubMed ID: 33552451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: a national survey.
    Pryor ER; Habermann B; Broome ME
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Jun; 33(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 17526690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Street research market: dealing with scientific misconduct in Iran.
    Sadeghi-Bazargani H; Nikniaz L; Yousefi Nodeh HR
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Aug; 21(1):78. PubMed ID: 32831079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country.
    Okonta PI; Rossouw T
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 15():25. PubMed ID: 24666413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating U.S. medical schools' efforts to educate faculty researchers on research integrity and research misconduct policies and procedures.
    Titus SL
    Account Res; 2014; 21(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 24073604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the perceived prevalence of research fraud among faculty at research-intensive universities in the USA.
    Reisig MD; Holtfreter K; Berzofsky ME
    Account Res; 2020 Oct; 27(7):457-475. PubMed ID: 32438829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices About Research Integrity and Scientific Misconduct Among the Faculty and Medical Postgraduates Working in Medical Colleges in North Karnataka and Central India: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey.
    Khot A; Chindhalore CA; Naikwadi A
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e59200. PubMed ID: 38807845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contextual adaptation of the Personnel Evaluation Standards for assessing faculty evaluation systems in developing countries: the case of Iran.
    Ahmady S; Changiz T; Brommels M; Gaffney FA; Thor J; Masiello I
    BMC Med Educ; 2009 Apr; 9():18. PubMed ID: 19400932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Questionable research practices of medical and dental faculty in Pakistan - a confession.
    Fahim A; Sadaf A; Jafari FH; Siddique K; Sethi A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2024 Jan; 25(1):11. PubMed ID: 38297258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Organizational role stress among medical school faculty members in Iran: dealing with role conflict.
    Ahmady S; Changiz T; Masiello I; Brommels M
    BMC Med Educ; 2007 May; 7():14. PubMed ID: 17535421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication misconduct: Perceptions of participants of a faculty development programme.
    Singh SP; Dhir SK; Sharma M; Singh T
    Natl Med J India; 2018; 31(3):169-171. PubMed ID: 31044767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Research misconduct: Knowledge, actions and attitudes of PhD candidates].
    Hofmann B; Holm S
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2016 Sep; 136(17):1442-7. PubMed ID: 27686203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Academic Tenure: Perceptual Variations Among Tenured, Tenure-seeking and Non-tenure Faculty.
    Ashcraft A; Andersen JS; Rogge MM; Song H; Opton L
    J Prof Nurs; 2021; 37(3):578-587. PubMed ID: 34016317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists.
    Tijdink JK; Verbeke R; Smulders YM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):64-71. PubMed ID: 25747691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship among factors affecting research misconduct in medical sciences in Iran.
    Mardani A; Nakhoda M; Shamsi Gooshki E
    Account Res; 2020 Oct; 27(7):417-443. PubMed ID: 32544348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Knowledge of scientific misconduct in publication among medical students.
    Mubeen SM; ; Ghayas R; Adil Rizvi SH; Khan SA
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2017; 30(2):140-145. PubMed ID: 28928344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fraud, misconduct or normal science in medical research--an empirical study of demarcation.
    Lynöe N; Jacobsson L; Lundgren E
    J Med Ethics; 1999 Dec; 25(6):501-6. PubMed ID: 10635506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding of International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Authorship Criteria Among Faculty Members of Pharmacy and Other Health Sciences in Jordan.
    Alshogran OY; Al-Delaimy WK
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Jul; 13(3):276-284. PubMed ID: 29631488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combating Scientific Misconduct: The Role of Focused Workshops in Changing Attitudes Towards Plagiarism.
    Rathore FA; Fatima NE; Farooq F; Mansoor SN
    Cureus; 2018 May; 10(5):e2698. PubMed ID: 30062072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.