These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34154820)

  • 1. Trueness and precision of complete-arch photogrammetry implant scanning assessed with a coordinate-measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Rubenstein J; Methani MM; Piedra-Cascón W; Özcan M; Att W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):160-165. PubMed ID: 34154820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of scan body design and digital implant analogs on implant replica position in additively manufactured casts.
    Revilla-León M; Fogarty R; Barrington JJ; Zandinejad A; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):202-210. PubMed ID: 31787272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Accuracy of photogrammetry and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an
    Sun YJ; Ma BW; Yue XX; Lin X; Geng W
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):168-172. PubMed ID: 35152653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
    Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of the Implant Replica Positions on the Complete Edentulous Additive Manufactured Cast.
    Olea-Vielba M; Jareño-García D; Methani MM; Martinez-Klemm I; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):780-786. PubMed ID: 32337776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of scan body design on accuracy of the implant position as transferred to a virtual definitive implant cast.
    Revilla-León M; Smith Z; Methani MM; Zandinejad A; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):918-923. PubMed ID: 32493568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression.
    Kim KR; Seo KY; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):543-549. PubMed ID: 30955939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of simulated intraoral variables on the accuracy of a photogrammetric imaging technique for complete-arch implant prostheses.
    Bratos M; Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):232-241. PubMed ID: 29559220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of digital implant analog design on the positional trueness of an analog in additively manufactured models: An in-vitro study.
    Mata-Mata SJ; Donmez MB; Meirelles L; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Dec; 24(6):821-830. PubMed ID: 36196856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital assessment of the accuracy of implant impression techniques in free end saddle partially edentulous patients. A controlled clinical trial.
    Dohiem MM; Abdelaziz MS; Abdalla MF; Fawzy AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):486. PubMed ID: 36371189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between stereophotogrammetric, digital, and conventional impression techniques in implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: An in vitro study.
    Tohme H; Lawand G; Chmielewska M; Makhzoume J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 129(2):354-362. PubMed ID: 34112521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions.
    Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of the accuracy of an implant intraoral scanner and that of a conventional intraoral scanner for complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Sallorenzo A; Gómez-Polo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1009-1016. PubMed ID: 33836855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrepancy at the implant abutment-prosthesis interface of complete-arch cobalt-chromium implant frameworks fabricated by additive and subtractive technologies before and after ceramic veneering.
    Revilla-León M; Sánchez-Rubio JL; Pérez-López J; Rubenstein J; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):795-803. PubMed ID: 32461043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
    Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Benic GI; Hogsett VL; White GS; Lal K; Gallucci GO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 21631595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro comparison of photogrammetric and conventional complete-arch implant impression techniques.
    Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Mancl L; Brudvik JS; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):243-51. PubMed ID: 24079558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of impressions for multiple implants: A comparative study of digital and conventional techniques.
    Lyu M; Di P; Lin Y; Jiang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1017-1023. PubMed ID: 33640093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.