230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34155319)
1. Anchoring the snare tip is a feasible endoscopic mucosal resection method for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Kim J; Kim J; Oh EH; Ham NS; Hwang SW; Park SH; Ye BD; Byeon JS; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Hong SM; Yang DH
Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):12918. PubMed ID: 34155319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic mucosal resection using anchored snare Tip-in versus precut technique for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Hong SW; Yang DH; Lee YJ; Baek DH; Chun J; Kim HG; Kim SJ; Hong SM; Myung DS
Korean J Intern Med; 2024 Mar; 39(2):238-247. PubMed ID: 38062724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cap-assisted EMR for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: comparisons with conventional EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (with videos).
Yang DH; Park Y; Park SH; Kim KJ; Ye BD; Byeon JS; Myung SJ; Yang SK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 May; 83(5):1015-22; quiz 1023-.e6. PubMed ID: 26460225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EMR-P for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: is it a preferred treatment?
Liu Z; Zheng C; Ding S; Chen C; Yang J; Wu R; Sun D
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 57(12):1503-1508. PubMed ID: 35758188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumor.
Kim J; Kim JH; Lee JY; Chun J; Im JP; Kim JS
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):77. PubMed ID: 29866049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy and safety of modified endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis.
Zheng JC; Zheng K; Zhao S; Wang ZN; Xu HM; Jiang CG
Z Gastroenterol; 2020 Feb; 58(2):137-145. PubMed ID: 32050284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advantage of endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Park SB; Kim HW; Kang DH; Choi CW; Kim SJ; Nam HS
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 21(31):9387-93. PubMed ID: 26309365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection provides comparable clinical outcomes to submucosal dissection for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum.
Cheung DY; Choi SK; Kim HK; Kim SS; Chae HS; Seo KJ; Cho YS
Surg Endosc; 2015 Jun; 29(6):1500-5. PubMed ID: 25277474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection combined with endoscopic ultrasonography: a novel method to treat rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Xie J; Hong D; Li D; Jiang C; Xu B; Liu M; Wang W
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Feb; 35(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 36574308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic treatments for rectal neuroendocrine tumors smaller than 16 mm: a meta-analysis.
Zhang HP; Wu W; Yang S; Lin J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1345-53. PubMed ID: 27367942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Endoscopic Treatment Outcome of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Removed by Ligation-assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Resection].
Gu MG; Lee SH
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2018 Sep; 72(3):128-134. PubMed ID: 30270594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of conventional and modified endoscopic mucosal resection methods for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Lee HS; Moon HS; Kwon IS; Park JH; Kim JS; Kang SH; Lee ES; Kim SH; Sung JK; Lee BS; Jeong HY
Surg Endosc; 2021 Nov; 35(11):6055-6065. PubMed ID: 33094828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endoloop ligation after endoscopic mucosal resection using a transparent cap: A novel method to treat small rectal carcinoid tumors.
Zhang DG; Luo S; Xiong F; Xu ZL; Li YX; Yao J; Wang LS
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Mar; 25(10):1259-1265. PubMed ID: 30886508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection using a dual-channel endoscope compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Lee WH; Kim SW; Lim CH; Kim JS; Cho YK; Lee IS; Choi MG; Choi KY
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4313-8. PubMed ID: 23807754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤10mm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhou C; Zhang F; We Y
Ann Saudi Med; 2023; 43(3):179-195. PubMed ID: 37270677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap and endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Zheng X; Wu M; Shi H; Er L; Wang K; Cao Y; Li S
BMC Surg; 2022 Jun; 22(1):248. PubMed ID: 35761304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic mucosal resection with suction vs. endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis.
Pan J; Zhang X; Shi Y; Pei Q
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Sep; 53(9):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 30193543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A tailored approach for endoscopic treatment of small rectal neuroendocrine tumor.
Heo J; Jeon SW; Jung MK; Kim SK; Shin GY; Park SM; Ahn SY; Yoon WK; Kim M; Kwon YH
Surg Endosc; 2014 Oct; 28(10):2931-8. PubMed ID: 24853847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Strategies for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Within 20 mm.
Yu Q; Zhang Y; Su Y; Zhao Q; Xiong K; Zhang L; Fang H
Am Surg; 2024 Jun; 90(6):1176-1186. PubMed ID: 38192125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The outcomes of modified endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors and the value of endoscopic morphology classification in endoscopic resection.
Wang XY; Chai NL; Linghu EQ; Qiu ST; Li LS; Zou JL; Xiang JY; Li XX
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):200. PubMed ID: 32586282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
