175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34155730)
41. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative deep myometrium assessment in endometrial cancer.
Wu WJ; Yu MS; Su HY; Lin KS; Lu KL; Hwang KS
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 52(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 23915853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Combined subjective and quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance images could improve the diagnostic performance of deep myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer.
Deng L; Wang QP; Yan R; Yu N; Bai L; Duan XY; Guo YM
Clin Imaging; 2017; 43():69-73. PubMed ID: 28232207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Preoperative prediction of deep myometrial invasion and tumor grade for stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma: a simple method of measurement on DWI.
Yan B; Liang X; Zhao T; Niu C; Ding C; Liu W
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):838-848. PubMed ID: 30039225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Accuracy of preoperative endometrial biopsy and intraoperative frozen section in predicting the final pathological diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
Mandato VD; Torricelli F; Mastrofilippo V; Palicelli A; Ciarlini G; Pirillo D; Annunziata G; Aguzzoli L
Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 35():229-235. PubMed ID: 32932219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Detection of deep myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of transvaginal ultrasound, CT, and MRI.
Kim SH; Kim HD; Song YS; Kang SB; Lee HP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(5):766-72. PubMed ID: 7560323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Value of sonohysterography in preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion for patients with endometrial cancer.
Chang SJ; Lee EJ; Kim WY; Yoo SC; Yoon JH; Chang KH; Ryu HS
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jun; 29(6):923-9. PubMed ID: 20498467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluating Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Reduced Field-of-view Diffusion-weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging.
Takeuchi M; Matsuzaki K; Harada M
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2018 Jan; 17(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 28515411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Preoperative Evaluation of Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Carcinoma: Prospective Intra-individual Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Volumetry, Diffusion-weighted and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Thieme SF; Collettini F; Sehouli J; Biocca L; Lella A; Wagner M; Almuheimid J; Plett H; Muallem MZ
Anticancer Res; 2018 Aug; 38(8):4813-4817. PubMed ID: 30061253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prediction of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal ultrasonography, and gross visual inspection.
Yahata T; Aoki Y; Tanaka K
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2007; 28(3):193-5. PubMed ID: 17624085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Assessment of deep myometrial invasion of endometrial cancer on MRI: added value of second-opinion interpretations by radiologists subspecialized in gynaecologic oncology.
Woo S; Kim SY; Cho JY; Kim SH
Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):1877-1882. PubMed ID: 27655304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Using Deep Learning with Convolutional Neural Network Approach to Identify the Invasion Depth of Endometrial Cancer in Myometrium Using MR Images: A Pilot Study.
Dong HC; Dong HK; Yu MH; Lin YH; Chang CC
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32824765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Accuracy of frozen sections for intraoperative diagnosis of complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia.
Turan T; Karadag B; Karabuk E; Tulunay G; Ozgul N; Gultekin M; Boran N; Isikdogan Z; Kose MF
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(5):1953-6. PubMed ID: 22901153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of myometrial invasion in stage I-II endometrial cancer.
Sethasathien P; Charoenkwan K; Siriaunkgul S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(17):7061-4. PubMed ID: 25227791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Preoperative assessment of deep myometrial and cervical invasion in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and histopathologic evaluation.
Vasconcelos C; Félix A; Cunha TM
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Jan; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 17365463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The evaluation of reliability and contribution of frozen section pathology to staging endometrioid adenocarcinomas.
Karabagli P; Ugras S; Yilmaz BS; Celik C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Aug; 292(2):391-7. PubMed ID: 25608758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Could a 2D/3D US based model be helpful in the assessment of myometrial invasion at time of intraoperative frozen section? A pilot study.
Ferrero A; Novara L; Perotto S; Capece R; Petey F; Perrini G; Mariani LL; DE Rosa G; Biglia N; Fuso L
Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 73(3):362-368. PubMed ID: 34008391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Influence of menopausal status on diagnostic accuracy of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at 3 T.
Lin G; Huang YT; Chao A; Ng KK; Yang LY; Ng SH; Lai CH
Clin Radiol; 2015 Nov; 70(11):1260-8. PubMed ID: 26233681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of endometrial cancer.
Wong M; Amin T; Thanatsis N; Naftalin J; Jurkovic D
J Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 33(2):e22. PubMed ID: 35128854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Diagnostic performance of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of low-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: prospective comparative study.
Cubo-Abert M; Díaz-Feijoo B; Bradbury M; Rodríguez-Mías NL; Vera M; Pérez-Hoyos S; Gómez-Cabeza JJ; Gil-Moreno A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 58(3):469-475. PubMed ID: 33533532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Ultrasonography, macroscopy, and frozen section: whıch is better for predicting deep myometrial invasıon in endometrial cancer?
Ozdemir CY; Telli EU; Oge T; Yalcin OT
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2023; 69(10):e20230333. PubMed ID: 37729223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
