These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34155957)

  • 21. The effect of uterine closure technique on cesarean scar niche development after multiple cesarean deliveries.
    Meyer JA; Silverstein J; Timor-Tritsch IE; Antoine C
    J Perinat Med; 2024 Feb; 52(2):150-157. PubMed ID: 38081042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in assessment of the impact of selected obstetric risk factors on cesarean scar niche formation: the case-controlled study.
    Budny-Winska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
    Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(5):378-382. PubMed ID: 33757154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of classic single-layer uterin suture and double-layer purse-string suture techniques for uterus closure in terms of postoperative short-term uterine isthmocele: A prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Yıldız E; Timur B
    Turk J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Sep; 20(3):206-213. PubMed ID: 37667481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hysteroscopy-assisted Transvaginal Repair without Scar Defect Resection: A Novel Technique for the Treatment of Uterine Niche.
    Zhu M; Xia W; Liang Y; Zhang J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 30(3):178-179. PubMed ID: 36646313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of adding a second layer to a single unlocked closure of a Cesarean uterine incision: randomized controlled trial.
    Bennich G; Rudnicki M; Wilken-Jensen C; Lousen T; Lassen PD; Wøjdemann K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 47(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 26489989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial.
    Stegwee SI; van der Voet LF; Ben AJ; de Leeuw RA; van de Ven PM; Duijnhoven RG; Bongers MY; Lambalk CB; de Groot C; Huirne J;
    BJOG; 2021 Apr; 128(5):866-878. PubMed ID: 32892392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure.
    Hamar BD; Saber SB; Cackovic M; Magloire LK; Pettker CM; Abdel-Razeq SS; Rosenberg VA; Buhimschi IA; Buhimschi CS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):808-13. PubMed ID: 17906013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The association of endometrial closure during cesarean section to the risk of developing uterine scar defect: a randomized control trial.
    Mohr-Sasson A; Castel E; Dadon T; Brandt A; Etinger R; Cohen A; Zajicek M; Haas J; Mashiach R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 May; 309(5):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 38498161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hydrosonographic Assessment of the Effect of Two Different Suture Materials on Healing of the Uterine Scar after Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Sevket O; Takmaz T; Ozcan P; Halici BNA; Islek SH
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2021 Apr; 225(2):140-145. PubMed ID: 32588418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Barbed vs conventional sutures for cesarean uterine scar defects: a randomized clinical trial.
    Maki J; Mitoma T; Ooba H; Nakato H; Mishima S; Tani K; Eto E; Yamamoto D; Yamamoto R; Kai K; Tamada T; Akamatsu K; Kawanishi K; Masuyama H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Sep; 6(9):101431. PubMed ID: 39019212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Impact of Uterine Incision Closure Techniques on Post-cesarean Delivery Niche Formation and Size: Sonohysterographic Examination of Nonpregnant Women.
    Antoine C; Meyer JA; Silverstein JS; Alexander J; Oh C; Timor-Tritsch IE
    J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jul; 41(7):1763-1771. PubMed ID: 34726789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of selected risk factors on uterine healing after cesarean section in women with single-layer uterine closure: A prospective study using two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography.
    Budny-Wińska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2022 Jan; 31(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 34738347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Novel Parallel Closure Technique Compared to Single-Layer Closure of the Uterus After Primary Cesarean Section Decreases the Incidence of Isthmocele Formation and Increases Residual Myometrial Thickness.
    Alper E; Aksakal E; Usta I; Urman B
    Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e60932. PubMed ID: 38910631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Risk of uterine niche following single-layer locked versus unlocked uterine closure: a randomized study.
    Bayraktar R; Mulayim B; Tamburaci E; Karadag C; Karadag B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):8210-8216. PubMed ID: 34470144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Uterine sutures at prior caesarean section and placenta accreta in subsequent pregnancy: a case-control study.
    Sumigama S; Sugiyama C; Kotani T; Hayakawa H; Inoue A; Mano Y; Tsuda H; Furuhashi M; Yamamuro O; Kinoshita Y; Okamoto T; Nakamura H; Matsusawa K; Sakakibara K; Oguchi H; Kawai M; Shimoyama Y; Tamakoshi K; Kikkawa F
    BJOG; 2014 Jun; 121(7):866-74; discussion 875. PubMed ID: 24666658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section.
    Dodd JM; Anderson ER; Gates S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD004732. PubMed ID: 18646108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Double-layered purse string uterine suture compared with single-layer continuous uterine suture: A randomized Controlled trial.
    Dimassi K; Ami O; Merai R; Velemir L; Simon B; Fauck D; Triki A
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Feb; 51(2):102282. PubMed ID: 34933146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Unknown uterine scar and trial of labor.
    Pruett KM; Kirshon B; Cotton DB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Oct; 159(4):807-10. PubMed ID: 3177527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ultrasound evaluation of Cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study.
    Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 42(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 23288683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of the primary cesarean hysterotomy scars after single- and double-layer interrupted closure.
    Kataoka S; Tanuma F; Iwaki Y; Iwaki K; Fujii T; Fujimoto T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Dec; 95(12):1352-1358. PubMed ID: 27617416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.