These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34156200)

  • 1. The best treatment approach for lower calyceal stones ≤20 mm in maximal diameter: mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery or shock wave lithotripsy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature conducted by the European Section of Uro-Technology and Young Academic Urologists.
    Kallidonis P; Adamou C; Ntasiotis P; Pietropaolo A; Somani B; Özsoy M; Liourdi D; Sarica K; Liatsikos E; Tailly T
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Dec; 73(6):711-723. PubMed ID: 34156200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which is the best treatment of pediatric upper urinary tract stones among extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review.
    He Q; Xiao K; Chen Y; Liao B; Li H; Wang K
    BMC Urol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):98. PubMed ID: 31640693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Kim CH; Chung DY; Rha KH; Lee JY; Lee SH
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Dec; 57(1):. PubMed ID: 33396839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
    Zhang W; Zhou T; Wu T; Gao X; Peng Y; Xu C; Chen Q; Song R; Sun Y
    J Endourol; 2015 Jul; 29(7):745-59. PubMed ID: 25531986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones >1cm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.
    Dorantes-Carrillo LA; Basulto-Martínez M; Suárez-Ibarrola R; Heinze A; Proietti S; Flores-Tapia JP; Esqueda-Mendoza A; Giusti G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jan; 8(1):259-270. PubMed ID: 33627307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones.
    Donaldson JF; Lardas M; Scrimgeour D; Stewart F; MacLennan S; Lam TB; McClinton S
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):612-6. PubMed ID: 25449204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Chung DY; Kang DH; Cho KS; Jeong WS; Jung HD; Kwon JK; Lee SH; Lee JY
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211316. PubMed ID: 30789937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, Standard and Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the Management of 1-2cm Renal Stones.
    Wymer KM; Sharma V; Juvet T; Klett DE; Borah BJ; Koo K; Rivera M; Agarwal D; Humphreys MR; Potretzke AM
    Urology; 2021 Oct; 156():71-77. PubMed ID: 34274389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. reply letter to Reply letter to: Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
    Cubuk A; Özkaptan O; Sahan A
    Urol J; 2021 Jan; 18(3):351-352. PubMed ID: 33495987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
    Junbo L; Yugen L; Guo J; Jing H; Ruichao Y; Tao W
    Urol J; 2019 May; 16(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 30604405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Tsai SH; Chung HJ; Tseng PT; Wu YC; Tu YK; Hsu CW; Lei WT
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Mar; 99(10):e19403. PubMed ID: 32150088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Residual Stone Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Shockwave Lithotripsy
    Danilovic A; Torricelli FCM; Marchini GS; Batagello C; Vicentini FC; Traxer O; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
    J Endourol; 2021 May; 35(5):609-614. PubMed ID: 33096975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of large pediatric renal pelvic stone burden more than 2 cm.
    Mohamed ER; Elmogazy HM; Zanaty AK; Elsharkawi AM; Riad AM; Badawy AA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Oct; 19(5):561.e1-561.e11. PubMed ID: 37414650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
    Setthawong V; Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Pattanittum P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Aug; 8(8):CD007044. PubMed ID: 37526261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What Is the Ideal Treatment for 20-30 mm Kidney Stones? Comparative Outcomes of 1197 Patients.
    Ibis MA; Gokce MI; Gökhan O; Karagoz MA; Yitgin Y; Babayigit M; Böyük A; Verep S; Tefik T; Kiremit MC; Senocak C; Guven S; Sarica K
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2023 Jun; 33(6):542-548. PubMed ID: 36827462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children.
    Barreto L; Jung JH; Abdelrahim A; Ahmed M; Dawkins GPC; Kazmierski M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 6(6):CD010784. PubMed ID: 29859007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal stones (LPSs) after the failure of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).
    Fan J; Zhang T; Zhu W; Gurioli A; Ketegwe IR; Zeng G
    Urolithiasis; 2019 Jun; 47(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 29947994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones Less Than 2 cm in Maximum Diameter.
    Kallidonis P; Ntasiotis P; Somani B; Adamou C; Emiliani E; Knoll T; Skolarikos A; Tailly T
    J Urol; 2020 Sep; 204(3):427-433. PubMed ID: 32150506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An easy risk stratification to recommend the optimal patients with 2-3 cm kidney stones to receive retrograde intrarenal surgery or mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
    Zhao Z; Sun H; Zeng T; Deng T; Liu Y; Zeng G
    Urolithiasis; 2020 Apr; 48(2):167-173. PubMed ID: 31101948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in surgical management of upper urinary stones - A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Jiao B; Luo Z; Xu X; Zhang M; Zhang G
    Int J Surg; 2019 Nov; 71():1-11. PubMed ID: 31521837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.