121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34157064)
1. Retention and Stability Characteristics of Soft-Liner and Clip Attachments Used for Bar/Implant-Assisted Mandibular Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
Denewar MM; Abdelmawgood EI; ELsyad MA; Al-Tonbary GY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(6):1095–1103. PubMed ID: 34157064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Different Bar Designs on Axial and Nonaxial Retention Forces of Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ashmawy TM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 30695085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Axial and Nonaxial Retention Forces of Different Designs of Milled Bar Attachments for Maxillary Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
Mahrous AI; El Afandy HM; Elsyad MA; Mohamed SS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(6):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 36450025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term clinical and prosthetic outcomes of soft liner and clip attachments for bar/implant overdentures: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
ELsyad MA; Shaheen NH; Ashmawy TM
J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 44(6):472-480. PubMed ID: 28258636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study.
ELsyad MA
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of resilient liner and clip attachments for bar-implant-retained mandibular overdentures on opposing maxillary ridge. A 5-year randomised clinical trial.
Elsyad MA; Ashmawy TM; Faramawy AG
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 41(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 24354686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Locator Versus Bar Attachment Effect on the Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdenture: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Dayekh MA; Khalifa AK
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e627-e636. PubMed ID: 28387994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of cantilevered bar length on strain around two implants supporting a mandibular overdenture.
Elsyad MA; Al-Mahdy YF; Salloum MG; Elsaih EA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):e143-50. PubMed ID: 23748333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures Using Different Types of Resilient Attachments: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Agha NN; Habib AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1040-8. PubMed ID: 27632258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures.
Uludag B; Polat S; Sahin V; Çomut AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1053-7. PubMed ID: 25216129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How the initial retentive force of implant-supported overdentures can be affected with splinted and unsplinted attachments systems.
Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Savabi G; Razavi M
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2021; 18():101. PubMed ID: 35265284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of bar cross-section and female housing material on retention of mandibular implant bar overdentures: A comparative
Abdel-Khalek EA; Ibrahim AM
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2017; 17(4):340-347. PubMed ID: 29249877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri-implant tissues of bar-implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a 1-year clinical and radiographical study.
Elsyad MA; Shoukouki AH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 May; 21(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 20443800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Bar, Telescopic, and Locator Attachments for Implant-Stabilized Overdentures in Patients with Mandibular Atrophied Ridges: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
ElSyad MA; Denewar BA; Elsaih EA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1103-1111. PubMed ID: 30231098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clips vs Resilient Liners Used With Bilateral Posterior Prefabricated Bars for Retaining Four Implant-Supported Mandibular Overdentures.
Gibreel M; Fouad M; El-Waseef F; El-Amier N; Marzook H
J Oral Implantol; 2017 Aug; 43(4):273-281. PubMed ID: 28628356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of denture cleaning solutions on the retention of Hader bar clips.
Küçükekenci AS; Dede DÖ; Çelik E
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):350.e1-350.e6. PubMed ID: 33198989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
