These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34157468)

  • 21. Data-driven cardiovascular flow modelling: examples and opportunities.
    Arzani A; Dawson STM
    J R Soc Interface; 2021 Feb; 18(175):20200802. PubMed ID: 33561376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Towards quantitative evaluation of wall shear stress from 4D flow imaging.
    Levilly S; Castagna M; Idier J; Bonnefoy F; Le Touzé D; Moussaoui S; Paul-Gilloteaux P; Serfaty JM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Dec; 74():232-243. PubMed ID: 32889090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unraveling the relationship between arterial flow and intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics.
    Morales HG; Bonnefous O
    J Biomech; 2015 Feb; 48(4):585-591. PubMed ID: 25638035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. High-fidelity virtual stenting: modeling of flow diverter deployment for hemodynamic characterization of complex intracranial aneurysms.
    Xiang J; Damiano RJ; Lin N; Snyder KV; Siddiqui AH; Levy EI; Meng H
    J Neurosurg; 2015 Oct; 123(4):832-40. PubMed ID: 26090829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation of Numerical Simulations of Thoracic Aorta Hemodynamics: Comparison with In Vivo Measurements and Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis.
    Boccadifuoco A; Mariotti A; Capellini K; Celi S; Salvetti MV
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):688-706. PubMed ID: 30357714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Physics-driven CFD modeling of complex anatomical cardiovascular flows-a TCPC case study.
    Pekkan K; de Zélicourt D; Ge L; Sotiropoulos F; Frakes D; Fogel MA; Yoganathan AP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 33(3):284-300. PubMed ID: 15868719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantitative comparison of hemodynamics in simulated and 3D angiography models of cerebral aneurysms by use of computational fluid dynamics.
    Saho T; Onishi H
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2015 Jul; 8(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 25911446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison of 4D-DSA with 3D-DSA Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations in Cerebral Aneurysms.
    Lang S; Hoelter P; Birkhold AI; Schmidt M; Endres J; Strother C; Doerfler A; Luecking H
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1505-1510. PubMed ID: 31467234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Uncertainty quantification in coronary blood flow simulations: Impact of geometry, boundary conditions and blood viscosity.
    Sankaran S; Kim HJ; Choi G; Taylor CA
    J Biomech; 2016 Aug; 49(12):2540-7. PubMed ID: 26803339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimizing the blood velocity differences between phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics simulation in cerebral arteries and aneurysms.
    Mohd Adib MAH; Ii S; Watanabe Y; Wada S
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Sep; 55(9):1605-1619. PubMed ID: 28161877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing the Risk of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Using Morphological and Hemodynamic Biomarkers Evaluated from Magnetic Resonance Fluid Dynamics and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
    Perera R; Isoda H; Ishiguro K; Mizuno T; Takehara Y; Terada M; Tanoi C; Naito T; Sakahara H; Hiramatsu H; Namba H; Izumi T; Wakabayashi T; Kosugi T; Onishi Y; Alley M; Komori Y; Ikeda M; Naganawa S
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2020 Dec; 19(4):333-344. PubMed ID: 31956175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modeling of the acute effects of primary hypertension and hypotension on the hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms.
    Sarrami-Foroushani A; Villa-Uriol MC; Nasr Esfahany M; Coley SC; Di Marco LY; Frangi AF; Marzo A
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 43(1):207-21. PubMed ID: 25118666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modeling hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms: Comparing accuracy of CFD solvers based on finite element and finite volume schemes.
    Botti L; Paliwal N; Conti P; Antiga L; Meng H
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2018 Sep; 34(9):e3111. PubMed ID: 29858530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of Uncertainty of Outlet Boundary Conditions in a Patient-Specific Case of Aortic Coarctation.
    Antonuccio MN; Mariotti A; Fanni BM; Capellini K; Capelli C; Sauvage E; Celi S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Dec; 49(12):3494-3507. PubMed ID: 34431017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Variational data assimilation for transient blood flow simulations: Cerebral aneurysms as an illustrative example.
    Funke SW; Nordaas M; Evju Ø; Alnaes MS; Mardal KA
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2019 Jan; 35(1):e3152. PubMed ID: 30198152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patient-Specific Multi-Scale Model Analysis of Hemodynamics Following the Hybrid Norwood Procedure for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: Effects of Reverse Blalock-Taussig Shunt Diameter.
    Ceballos A; Prather R; Divo E; Kassab AJ; DeCampli WM
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2019 Mar; 10(1):136-154. PubMed ID: 30515683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Coupling hemodynamics with mechanobiology in patient-specific computational models of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms.
    Jamaleddin Mousavi S; Jayendiran R; Farzaneh S; Campisi S; Viallon M; Croisille P; Avril S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Jun; 205():106107. PubMed ID: 33933713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Discrimination of intracranial aneurysm rupture status: patient-specific inflow boundary may not be a must-have condition in hemodynamic simulations.
    Li W; Wang S; Tian Z; Zhu W; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang K; Yang X; Liu J
    Neuroradiology; 2020 Nov; 62(11):1485-1495. PubMed ID: 32588092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An Automated Workflow for Hemodynamic Computations in Cerebral Aneurysms.
    Nita CI; Suzuki T; Itu LM; Mihalef V; Takao H; Murayama Y; Sharma P; Redel T; Rapaka S
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2020; 2020():5954617. PubMed ID: 32655681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Uncertainty quantification of wall shear stress in intracranial aneurysms using a data-driven statistical model of systemic blood flow variability.
    Sarrami-Foroushani A; Lassila T; Gooya A; Geers AJ; Frangi AF
    J Biomech; 2016 Dec; 49(16):3815-3823. PubMed ID: 28573970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.