These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34157836)

  • 21. Life cycle assessment of combustion-based electricity generation technologies integrated with carbon capture and storage: A review.
    Wang Y; Pan Z; Zhang W; Borhani TN; Li R; Zhang Z
    Environ Res; 2022 May; 207():112219. PubMed ID: 34656638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Early public impressions of terrestrial carbon capture and storage in a coal-intensive state.
    Carley SR; Krause RM; Warren DC; Rupp JA; Graham JD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(13):7086-93. PubMed ID: 22681614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of carbon dioxide removal technologies on deep decarbonization of the electric power sector.
    Bistline JET; Blanford GJ
    Nat Commun; 2021 Jun; 12(1):3732. PubMed ID: 34140470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biorefineries of carbon dioxide: From carbon capture and storage (CCS) to bioenergies production.
    Cheah WY; Ling TC; Juan JC; Lee DJ; Chang JS; Show PL
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Sep; 215():346-356. PubMed ID: 27090405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. CO
    Anwar MN; Fayyaz A; Sohail NF; Khokhar MF; Baqar M; Khan WD; Rasool K; Rehan M; Nizami AS
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Nov; 226():131-144. PubMed ID: 30114572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimal bioenergy power generation for climate change mitigation with or without carbon sequestration.
    Woolf D; Lehmann J; Lee DR
    Nat Commun; 2016 Oct; 7():13160. PubMed ID: 27767177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long-term energy and climate implications of carbon capture and storage deployment strategies in the US coal-fired electricity fleet.
    Sathre R; Masanet E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(17):9768-76. PubMed ID: 22857130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Implications of ammonia emissions from post-combustion carbon capture for airborne particulate matter.
    Heo J; McCoy ST; Adams PJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(8):5142-50. PubMed ID: 25811231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Potential acidification impacts on zooplankton in CCS leakage scenarios.
    Halsband C; Kurihara H
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Aug; 73(2):495-503. PubMed ID: 23632089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Popularization of Carbon Capture and Storage Technology in Society: Principles and Methods.
    Cherepovitsyn A; Chvileva T; Fedoseev S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(22):. PubMed ID: 33198172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration of Process Emissions from the U.S. Industrial Sector.
    Pilorgé H; McQueen N; Maynard D; Psarras P; He J; Rufael T; Wilcox J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 54(12):7524-7532. PubMed ID: 32432460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exploring the role of natural gas power plants with carbon capture and storage as a bridge to a low-carbon future.
    Babaee S; Loughlin DH
    Clean Technol Environ Policy; 2017 Dec; 20(2):379-391. PubMed ID: 32461751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of Biogenic Carbon Neutrality Assumption for Achieving a Net-Zero Emission Target: Insights from a Techno-Economic Analysis.
    Kouchaki-Penchah H; Bahn O; Vaillancourt K; Moreau L; Thiffault E; Levasseur A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Jul; 57(29):10615-10628. PubMed ID: 37432042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Deciding between carbon trading and carbon capture and sequestration: an optimisation-based case study for methanol synthesis from syngas.
    Üçtuğ FG; Ağralı S; Arıkan Y; Avcıoğlu E
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 132():1-8. PubMed ID: 24246850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of optimal conditions for the performance of greenhouse gas removal methods.
    Asibor JO; Clough PT; Nabavi SA; Manovic V
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Sep; 294():113039. PubMed ID: 34153633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Environmental impact assessment of post-combustion CO
    Galusnyak SC; Petrescu L; Cormos CC
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 320():115908. PubMed ID: 35961143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Illustrative national scale scenarios of environmental and human health impacts of Carbon Capture and Storage.
    Tzanidakis K; Oxley T; Cockerill T; ApSimon H
    Environ Int; 2013 Jun; 56():48-64. PubMed ID: 23603732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12576-84. PubMed ID: 26422409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Clark VR; Herzog HJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of multimode gas-fired combined-cycle chemical-looping combustion-based power plant layouts.
    Jayadevappa BR
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(36):54967-54987. PubMed ID: 35307797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.