167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34158010)
1. Transvaginal two-dimensional ultrasound measurement of cervical volume to predict the outcome of the induction of labour: a prospective observational study.
Athulathmudali SR; Patabendige M; Chandrasinghe SK; De Silva PHP
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jun; 21(1):433. PubMed ID: 34158010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, Bishop score, and sonographic cervical length: tolerability and prediction of vaginal birth and vaginal birth within 24 hours following labour induction in nulliparous women.
Vallikkannu N; Lam WK; Omar SZ; Tan PC
BJOG; 2017 Jul; 124(8):1274-1283. PubMed ID: 27348806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting the success of induction of labour using cervical volume.
Patabendige M; Athulathmudali SR
BMC Res Notes; 2021 Dec; 14(1):453. PubMed ID: 34922611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospital-based comparative clinical trial.
Abdullah ZHA; Chew KT; Velayudham VRV; Yahaya Z; Jamil AAM; Abu MA; Ghani NAA; Ismail NAM
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262387. PubMed ID: 35081157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB
Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of the Manipal Cervical Scoring System for predicting successful induction of labour.
Mohamed El Bishry G; Serag Allam I; Rasheedy R; Mahmoud A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Nov; 39(8):1057-1064. PubMed ID: 31046494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement and Bishop score for predicting labour induction outcomes.
Vince K; Poljičanin T; Matijević R
J Perinat Med; 2022 Nov; 50(9):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 35654131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour.
Elghorori MR; Hassan I; Dartey W; Abdel-Aziz E; Bradley M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 26(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 17000497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor.
Gómez-Laencina AM; García CP; Asensio LV; Ponce JA; Martínez MS; Martínez-Vizcaíno V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jun; 285(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 22198844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score.
Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Chastang C; Ville Y
BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 15663583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].
Gomes F; Ramalho C; Machado AP; Calado E; Cardoso F; Montenegro N
Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women.
Keepanasseril A; Suri V; Bagga R; Aggarwal N
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 47(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 17877596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasonography versus Bishop score to predict successful labour induction in term pregnancies.
Groeneveld YJ; Bohnen AM; Van Heusden AM
Facts Views Vis Obgyn; 2010; 2(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 25013711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction.
Gómez Laencina AM; Sánchez FG; Gimenez JH; Martínez MS; Valverde Martínez JA; Vizcaíno VM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 17611824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.
Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening.
Ezebialu IU; Eke AC; Eleje GU; Nwachukwu CE
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 2015(6):CD010762. PubMed ID: 26068943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction of failed labor induction?
Roman H; Verspyck E; Vercoustre L; Degre S; Col JY; Firmin JM; Caron P; Marpeau L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 23(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 15065185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
