These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Accuracy and Reliability of Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis and Quantification of Hill-Sachs Lesions: A Systematic Review. Vopat ML; Peebles LA; McBride T; Cirone I; Rider D; Provencher CMT Arthroscopy; 2021 Jan; 37(1):391-401. PubMed ID: 32798670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of computed tomography and 3D magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating glenohumeral instability bone loss. Lander ST; Liles JL; Kim BI; Taylor DC; Lau BC J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Nov; 31(11):2217-2224. PubMed ID: 35931334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Glenoid Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability: Superiority of Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography over Two-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Established Methodology. Weber AE; Bolia IK; Horn A; Villacis D; Omid R; Tibone JE; White E; Hatch GF Clin Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(2):223-228. PubMed ID: 34094013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and Consistency of 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Comparable With 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Assessing Glenohumeral Instability: A Systematic Review. Liu G; Huang C; Li Y; Jiang S; Lu W; Yacoub Hassan MH; Essien AE; Pavel V; Xiao W Arthroscopy; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38599537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss in Patients With Glenohumeral Instability: A Systematic Review. Walter WR; Samim M; LaPolla FWZ; Gyftopoulos S AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 May; 212(5):1096-1105. PubMed ID: 30835517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss Is Equivalent to 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Quantification: Cadaveric Study. Yanke AB; Shin JJ; Pearson I; Bach BR; Romeo AA; Cole BJ; Verma NN Arthroscopy; 2017 Apr; 33(4):709-715. PubMed ID: 27923707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging methods for quantifying glenoid and Hill-Sachs bone loss in traumatic instability of the shoulder: a scoping review. Saliken DJ; Bornes TD; Bouliane MJ; Sheps DM; Beaupre LA BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Jul; 16():164. PubMed ID: 26187270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hill-Sachs Lesion Classification by the Glenoid Track Paradigm in Shoulder Instability: Poor Agreement Between 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic and Arthroscopic Methods. Funakoshi T; Hartzler RU; Stewien E; Burkhart SS Arthroscopy; 2019 Jun; 35(6):1743-1749. PubMed ID: 31072719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of Currently Available Methods in Quantifying Anterior Glenoid Bone Loss: Controversy Regarding Gold Standard-A Systematic Review. Verweij LPE; Schuit AA; Kerkhoffs GMMJ; Blankevoort L; van den Bekerom MPJ; van Deurzen DFP Arthroscopy; 2020 Aug; 36(8):2295-2313.e1. PubMed ID: 32330485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT estimation of glenoid bone loss in anterior glenohumeral instability : a systematic review of existing techniques. Green GL; Arnander M; Pearse E; Tennent D Bone Jt Open; 2022 Feb; 3(2):114-122. PubMed ID: 35109662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does Bone Loss Imaging Modality, Measurement Methodology, and Interobserver Reliability Alter Treatment in Glenohumeral Instability? Chalmers PN; Christensen G; O'Neill D; Tashjian RZ Arthroscopy; 2020 Jan; 36(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 31864563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating Glenoid Width for Instability-Related Bone Loss: A CT Evaluation of an MRI Formula. Giles JW; Owens BD; Athwal GS Am J Sports Med; 2015 Jul; 43(7):1726-30. PubMed ID: 25908112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of using an inversion-recovery ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence for quantification of glenoid bone loss. Ma YJ; West J; Nazaran A; Cheng X; Hoenecke H; Du J; Chang EY Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Jul; 47(7):973-980. PubMed ID: 29396694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Insufficient consensus regarding circle size and bone loss width using the ratio-"best fit circle"-method even with three-dimensional computed tomography. Lacheta L; Herbst E; Voss A; Braun S; Jungmann P; Millett PJ; Imhoff A; Martetschläger F Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Oct; 27(10):3222-3229. PubMed ID: 30725122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-Dimensional Zero Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography for Glenoid Bone Assessment. de Mello RAF; Ma YJ; Ashir A; Jerban S; Hoenecke H; Carl M; Du J; Chang EY Arthroscopy; 2020 Sep; 36(9):2391-2400. PubMed ID: 32502712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of Glenoid Bone Loss With 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Matched Computed Tomography Analysis. Vopat BG; Cai W; Torriani M; Vopat ML; Hemma M; Harris GJ; Schantz K; Provencher MT Arthroscopy; 2018 Dec; 34(12):3141-3147. PubMed ID: 30396796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3D-MR vs. 3D-CT of the shoulder in patients with glenohumeral instability. Stillwater L; Koenig J; Maycher B; Davidson M Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Mar; 46(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 28028575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective Evaluation of Glenoid Bone Loss After First-time and Recurrent Anterior Glenohumeral Instability Events. Dickens JF; Slaven SE; Cameron KL; Pickett AM; Posner M; Campbell SE; Owens BD Am J Sports Med; 2019 Apr; 47(5):1082-1089. PubMed ID: 30943084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Critical Findings on Magnetic Resonance Arthrograms in Posterior Shoulder Instability Compared With an Age-Matched Controlled Cohort. Galvin JW; Parada SA; Li X; Eichinger JK Am J Sports Med; 2016 Dec; 44(12):3222-3229. PubMed ID: 27528612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]