These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34159837)

  • 1. Computer-Assisted Navigation Is Associated With Decreased Rates of Hardware-Related Revision After Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Fusion.
    Bovonratwet P; Gu A; Chen AZ; Samuel AM; Vaishnav AS; Sheha ED; Gang CH; Qureshi SA
    Global Spine J; 2023 May; 13(4):1104-1111. PubMed ID: 34159837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conventional Versus Stereotactic Image-guided Pedicle Screw Placement During Posterior Lumbar Fusions: A Retrospective Propensity Score-matched Study of a National Longitudinal Database.
    Pendharkar AV; Rezaii PG; Ho AL; Sussman ES; Veeravagu A; Ratliff JK; Desai AM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Nov; 44(21):E1272-E1280. PubMed ID: 31634303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 30-Day Complications Between Navigated and Conventional Single-level Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.
    Bovonratwet P; Nelson SJ; Ondeck NT; Geddes BJ; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Mar; 43(6):447-453. PubMed ID: 28700450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrospective Review of Revision Surgery After Image-guided Instrumented Spinal Surgery Compared With Traditional Instrumented Spinal Surgery.
    Towner JE; Li YI; Singla A; Moquin R; Li YM
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Aug; 33(7):E317-E321. PubMed ID: 32049676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there a difference between navigated and non-navigated robot cohorts in robot-assisted spine surgery? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis of 2,800 screws and 372 patients.
    Lee NJ; Zuckerman SL; Buchanan IA; Boddapati V; Mathew J; Leung E; Park PJ; Pham MH; Buchholz AL; Khan A; Pollina J; Mullin JP; Jazini E; Haines C; Schuler TC; Good CR; Lombardi JM; Lehman RA
    Spine J; 2021 Sep; 21(9):1504-1512. PubMed ID: 34022461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Complications in Navigated versus Conventional Thoracolumbar Fusion in the Setting of Adult Spinal Deformity.
    Ansari D; DesLaurier JT; Almadidy Z; Chaudhry NS; Mehta AI
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e616-e625. PubMed ID: 35339712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conventional versus stereotactic image guided pedicle screw placement during spinal deformity correction: a retrospective propensity score-matched study of a national longitudinal database.
    Rezaii PG; Pendharkar AV; Ho AL; Sussman ES; Veeravagu A; Ratliff JK; Desai AM
    Int J Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 131(10):953-961. PubMed ID: 32364414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Schröder ML; Staartjes VE
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May; 42(5):E12. PubMed ID: 28463610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outpatient elective posterior lumbar fusions appear to be safely considered for appropriately selected patients.
    Bovonratwet P; Ottesen TD; Gala RJ; Rubio DR; Ondeck NT; McLynn RP; Grauer JN
    Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1188-1196. PubMed ID: 29155341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 and bone marrow aspirate with allograft as alternatives to autograft in instrumented revision posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a minimum two-year follow-up study.
    Taghavi CE; Lee KB; Keorochana G; Tzeng ST; Yoo JH; Wang JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(11):1144-50. PubMed ID: 20139805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Instrumented Posterolateral fusion versus instrumented Interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases in uremic patients under hemodialysis.
    Ho CN; Liao JC; Chen WJ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Dec; 21(1):815. PubMed ID: 33278885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population-based Survivorship of Computer-navigated Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Antonios JK; Kang HP; Robertson D; Oakes DA; Lieberman JR; Heckmann ND
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2020 Oct; 28(20):857-864. PubMed ID: 31934926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing rates of early pedicle screw loosening in posterolateral lumbar fusion with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kim DH; Hwang RW; Lee GH; Joshi R; Baker KC; Arnold P; Sasso R; Park D; Fischgrund J
    Spine J; 2020 Sep; 20(9):1438-1445. PubMed ID: 32387295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of novel machine vision spinal image guidance system with existing 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation system: a randomized prospective study.
    Malham GM; Munday NR
    Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):561-569. PubMed ID: 34666179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel placement of cortical bone trajectory screws in previously instrumented pedicles for adjacent-segment lumbar disease using CT image-guided navigation.
    Rodriguez A; Neal MT; Liu A; Somasundaram A; Hsu W; Branch CL
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 Mar; 36(3):E9. PubMed ID: 24580010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical outcomes following spinal fusion using an intraoperative computed tomographic 3D imaging system.
    Xiao R; Miller JA; Sabharwal NC; Lubelski D; Alentado VJ; Healy AT; Mroz TE; Benzel EC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 May; 26(5):628-637. PubMed ID: 28291408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic Versus Navigation Assisted Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A National Database Study.
    Gouzoulis MJ; Seddio AE; Winter AD; Jabbouri SS; Zhu JR; Rubio DR; Varthi AG; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38717329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Prospective Study Reporting Intraoperative Parameters, Pedicle Screw Perforation, and Radiation Exposure in Navigation-Guided versus Non-navigated Fluoroscopy-Assisted Minimal Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Dusad T; Kundnani V; Dutta S; Patel A; Mehta G; Singh M
    Asian Spine J; 2018 Apr; 12(2):309-316. PubMed ID: 29713413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoperative Navigation in Spine Surgery: Effects on Complications and Reoperations.
    Shuman WH; Valliani AA; Chapman EK; Martini ML; Neifert SN; Baron RB; Schupper AJ; Steinberger JM; Caridi JM
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Apr; 160():e404-e411. PubMed ID: 35033690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing Cortical Trajectory Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions Against Pedicle Trajectory Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions and Posterolateral Fusions: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 90-day Outcomes.
    Malcolm JG; Moore MK; Choksh FH; Ahmad FU; Refai D
    Neurosurgery; 2018 Dec; 83(6):1234-1240. PubMed ID: 29346684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.