These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34160570)

  • 1. Ten Practical Recommendations for Improving Blinding Integrity and Reporting in Psychotherapy Trials.
    Mataix-Cols D; Andersson E
    JAMA Psychiatry; 2021 Sep; 78(9):943-944. PubMed ID: 34160570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Core Outcome Sets.
    Webbe J; Sinha I; Gale C
    Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed; 2018 Jun; 103(3):163-166. PubMed ID: 28667046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fool's gold? Why blinded trials are not always best.
    Anand R; Norrie J; Bradley JM; McAuley DF; Clarke M
    BMJ; 2020 Jan; 368():l6228. PubMed ID: 31964628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reply to Drs. Olanow and Rascol.
    Ahlskog JE; Uitti RJ
    Neurology; 2010 Apr; 74(14):1151. PubMed ID: 20368636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical effectiveness: an approach to clinical trial design more relevant to clinical practice, acknowledging the importance of individual differences.
    Moore RA; Derry S; McQuay HJ; Straube S; Aldington D; Wiffen P; Bell RF; Kalso E; Rowbotham MC;
    Pain; 2010 May; 149(2):173-176. PubMed ID: 19748185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blinding in pharmacological trials: the devil is in the details.
    Wan M; Orlu-Gul M; Legay H; Tuleu C
    Arch Dis Child; 2013 Sep; 98(9):656-9. PubMed ID: 23898156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A response to Wasan editorial "Spinal cord stimulation in a workers' compensation population: how difficult it can be to interpret a clinical trial": stimulating discussion.
    Turner JA; Hollingworth W; Comstock BA; Deyo RA
    Pain; 2010 May; 149(2):406-407. PubMed ID: 20207083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standardising the reporting of outcomes in gastric cancer surgery trials: protocol for the development of a core outcome set and accompanying outcome measurement instrument set (the GASTROS study).
    Alkhaffaf B; Glenny AM; Blazeby JM; Williamson P; Bruce IA
    Trials; 2017 Aug; 18(1):370. PubMed ID: 28793921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the reporting and interpretation of clinical trial outcomes.
    Froud R; Underwood M; Eldridge S
    Br J Gen Pract; 2012 Oct; 62(603):e729-31. PubMed ID: 23265234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moving Beyond Medications That Act at the μ Receptor in the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.
    Strain EC; Kampman KM; Weiss RD
    JAMA Psychiatry; 2021 Jul; 78(7):701-702. PubMed ID: 33851964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Agenda for child and adolescent psychotherapy research: on the need to put science into practice.
    Weisz JR
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2000 Sep; 57(9):837-8. PubMed ID: 10986545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does it matter what we measure? Core outcomes, the IUJ and the CROWN and COMET initiatives.
    Dwyer PL; Riss P; Haylen BT
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Oct; 25(10):1301-2. PubMed ID: 25074258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing blinding in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture: challenges and recommendations.
    Hopton AK; Macpherson H
    Chin J Integr Med; 2011 Mar; 17(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 21359917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing social validity in clinical treatment research: issues and procedures.
    Foster SL; Mash EJ
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1999 Jun; 67(3):308-19. PubMed ID: 10369051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research design considerations for confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.
    Dworkin RH; Turk DC; Peirce-Sandner S; Baron R; Bellamy N; Burke LB; Chappell A; Chartier K; Cleeland CS; Costello A; Cowan P; Dimitrova R; Ellenberg S; Farrar JT; French JA; Gilron I; Hertz S; Jadad AR; Jay GW; Kalliomäki J; Katz NP; Kerns RD; Manning DC; McDermott MP; McGrath PJ; Narayana A; Porter L; Quessy S; Rappaport BA; Rauschkolb C; Reeve BB; Rhodes T; Sampaio C; Simpson DM; Stauffer JW; Stucki G; Tobias J; White RE; Witter J
    Pain; 2010 May; 149(2):177-193. PubMed ID: 20207481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What meta-analyses have and have not taught us about psychotherapy effects: a review and future directions.
    Matt GE; Navarro AM
    Clin Psychol Rev; 1997; 17(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 9125365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A tool for assessing the comprehensiveness of outcome reporting within clinical trials in pregnancy.
    Lim JWJ; Lor KY; D'Souza R
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Jun; 100(6):1082-1088. PubMed ID: 33370447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Raising the standard of applied dementia care research: addressing the implementation error.
    Vernooij-Dassen M; Moniz-Cook E
    Aging Ment Health; 2014 Sep; 18(7):809-14. PubMed ID: 24815025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
    Higashida RT; Furlan AJ; Roberts H; Tomsick T; Connors B; Barr J; Dillon W; Warach S; Broderick J; Tilley B; Sacks D; ;
    Stroke; 2003 Aug; 34(8):e109-37. PubMed ID: 12869717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative: Its Role in Improving Cochrane Reviews.
    Williamson P; Clarke M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Apr; 2012(5):ED000041. PubMed ID: 22592744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.