164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34160869)
1. Survival Rates of Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses Supported by Short Dental Implants (≤8.5 mm): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Li QL; Yao MF; Cao RY; Zhao K; Wang XD
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 34160869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should the restoration of adjacent implants be splinted or nonsplinted? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Lemos CAA; Cruz RS; Oliveira HFF; Gomes JML; Pellizzer EP
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 29961632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Split-Mouth Comparison of Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses on Short Implants: 3-Year Results.
Clelland N; Chaudhry J; Rashid RG; McGlumphy E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1135-41. PubMed ID: 27632270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of splinting implant-supported crowns on the performance of adjacent posterior implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pascoal ALB; Paiva KRG; Marinho LCN; Bezerra ADS; Calderon PDS
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38955598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of marginal bone loss, survival rate, and prosthetic complications in implant-supported splinted and nonsplinted restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shah AH; Patel P; Trivedi A; Shah A; Desai N; Talati M
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(2):111-121. PubMed ID: 36511022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. LIMITED EVIDENCE SUGGESTS SURVIVAL OF NON-SPLINTED SHORT IMPLANTS (≤8.5 MM) IS COMPARABLE TO THAT OF SPLINTED IMPLANTS.
Radi IA; Ismail SM
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2023 Jun; 23(2):101840. PubMed ID: 37201981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-Term Effectiveness of Extra-Short (≤ 6 mm) Dental Implants: A Systematic Review.
Ravidà A; Barootchi S; Askar H; Suárez-López Del Amo F; Tavelli L; Wang HL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 30695086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite Element Analysis of Bone Stress in the Posterior Mandible Using Regular and Short Implants, in the Same Context, with Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses.
Toniollo MB; Macedo AP; Pupim D; Zaparolli D; da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):e199-e206. PubMed ID: 28708912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Use of Splinted Versus Nonsplinted Prosthetic Design in Dental Implants: A Literature Review.
Al-Juboori MJ; Al-Attas MA; Minichetti J; Akhikar J
J Oral Implantol; 2024 Feb; 50(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 38329841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of stress distribution with splinted and nonsplinted maxillary anterior fixed prostheses supported by zirconia or titanium implants.
Bal BT; Cağlar A; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bankoğlu M; Eser A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e27-38. PubMed ID: 23377079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Crestal Bone Loss Around Adjacent Dental Implants Restored with Splinted and Nonsplinted Fixed Restorations: A Systematic Literature Review.
Al Amri MD; Kellesarian SV
J Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 26(6):495-501. PubMed ID: 27996179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution Generated by Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses in the Rehabilitation of Various Bony Ridges with Regular or Short Morse Taper Implants.
Toniollo MB; Macedo AP; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF; de Mattos MG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):372-376. PubMed ID: 28291862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of strains for splinted and nonsplinted screw-retained prostheses on short implants.
Yilmaz B; Seidt JD; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1176-82. PubMed ID: 22167421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of marginal bone level change around multiple adjacent implants restored with splinted and nonsplinted restorations: a 10-year randomized controlled trial.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S; Zaccaria M; Stellini E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(2):411-8. PubMed ID: 25830402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.
Wang JH; Judge R; Bailey D
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 27611744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Effectiveness of 6.5-mm-Long Implants to Support Two-Implant Fixed Prostheses in Premolar-Molar Region: The Influence of Immediate Loading and the Length of Splinting Implant.
Anitua E; Flores C; Flores J; Alkhraisat MH
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e688-e693. PubMed ID: 29377338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A retrospective evaluation of the survival rates of splinted and non-splinted short dental implants in posterior partially edentulous jaws.
Mendonça JA; Francischone CE; Senna PM; Matos de Oliveira AE; Sotto-Maior BS
J Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 85(6):787-94. PubMed ID: 24171498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single versus splinted short implants at sinus augmented sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Afrashtehfar KI; Katsoulis J; Koka S; Igarashi K
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jun; 122(3):303-310. PubMed ID: 33002610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Circumferential bone loss around splinted and nonsplinted immediately loaded implants retaining mandibular overdentures: A randomized controlled clinical trial using cone beam computed tomography.
Elsyad MA; Khirallah AS
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Nov; 116(5):741-748. PubMed ID: 27174405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Splinting or Nonsplinting Adjacent Implants? A Retrospective Study Up to 15 Years: Part I-Biologic and Mechanical Complication Analysis.
Yi Y; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Koo KT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 May, Jun; 38(3):435-442a. PubMed ID: 37279228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
