These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34160869)

  • 21. Randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of splinting crowns on short implants in the mandible 3 years after loading.
    Al-Sawaf O; Tuna T; Rittich A; Kern T; Wolfart S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Nov; 31(11):1061-1071. PubMed ID: 33463774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Marginal Bone Loss in Posterior Implants Placed at Different Levels and Different Prosthetic Designs: A Retrospective Study With a Minimum of 1-Year Follow-Up.
    Kasabreh NS; Khurshid H; Khan MQ; Malaikah S; Wang HL
    J Oral Implantol; 2024 Jun; 50(3):232-237. PubMed ID: 38600837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The significance of vertical platform discrepancies and splinting on marginal bone levels for adjacent dental implants.
    Lin GH; Tran C; Brzyska K; Kan JY; Wang HL; Curtis DA; Kao RT
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Apr; 25(2):321-329. PubMed ID: 36593583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lemos CA; de Souza Batista VE; Almeida DA; Santiago Júnior JF; Verri FR; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 26589441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Displacement of screw-retained splinted and nonsplinted restorations into implants with conical internal connections.
    Yilmaz B; Seidt JD; Clelland NL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1289-92. PubMed ID: 25397792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does Splinting the Direct Copings Increase the Impression Accuracy of Two-Unit Nonparallel Implant Restorations? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ma Y; Al-Radhi RYZ; Jiang L; Yu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):653-659. PubMed ID: 35904821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical evaluation of marginal bone level change of multiple adjacent implants restored with splinted and nonsplinted restorations: a 5-year prospective study.
    Vigolo P; Zaccaria M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1189-94. PubMed ID: 21197497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of Stress and Strain Distribution Around Splinted and Nonsplinted 6-mm Short Implants in Posterior Mandible: A Finite Element Analysis Study.
    Meimandi M; Talebi Ardakani MR; Amid R; Mahmoudi Motlagh A; Beheshti S
    Implant Dent; 2018 Feb; 27(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 29334509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of external and internal implant-abutment connections for implant supported prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Bonfante EA; Santiago Júnior JF; Pellizzer EP
    J Dent; 2018 Mar; 70():14-22. PubMed ID: 29221955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Splinted and Nonsplinted Crowns with Different Implant Lengths in the Posterior Maxilla by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Santiago Junior JF; de Souza Batista VE; Kemmoku DT; Noritomi PY; Pellizzer EP
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():3163096. PubMed ID: 30254726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented atrophic mandibles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with a 5-year post-loading follow-up.
    Esposito M; Buti J; Barausse C; Gasparro R; Sammartino G; Felice P
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(3):267-280. PubMed ID: 31535097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions of short implants in posterior regions: A 4-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study.
    Tang Y; Yu H; Wang J; Gao M; Qiu L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 22(1):119-127. PubMed ID: 31908138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Marginal Bone Loss and Clinical Complications in Surviving Implants and Recently Placed Implants Splinted Together: A Retrospective Study.
    Perlis V; Meidan Z; Ormianer Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(6):1250-1255. PubMed ID: 36450032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patient satisfaction and survival of maxillary overdentures supported by four or six splinted implants: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Di Francesco F; De Marco G; Capcha EB; Lanza A; Cristache CM; Vernal R; Cafferata EA
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):247. PubMed ID: 33962612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Early function of splinted implants in maxillas and posterior mandibles, using Brånemark System Tiunite implants: an 18-month prospective clinical multicenter study.
    Vanden Bogaerde L; Pedretti G; Dellacasa P; Mozzati M; Rangert B; Wendelhag I
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2004; 6(3):121-9. PubMed ID: 15726846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Different implant impression techniques for edentulous patients treated with CAD/CAM complete-arch prostheses: a randomised controlled trial reporting data at 3 year post-loading.
    Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Mangani F; Barlattani A
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 24570979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biological and mechanical complications of angulated abutments connected to fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Omori Y; Lang NP; Botticelli D; Papageorgiou SN; Baba S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2020 Jan; 47(1):101-111. PubMed ID: 31441527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical outcomes of short implants (≤ 6 mm) placed between two adjacent teeth/implants or in the most distal position: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ravidà A; Galli M; Bianchi M; Parisi E; Saleh MHA; Stacchi C; Misch C; Wang HL
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2021 Aug; 14(3):241-257. PubMed ID: 34415127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla Using Splinted Short Implants or Sinus Augmentation with Standard-Length Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Pieri F; Caselli E; Forlivesi C; Corinaldesi G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1179-88. PubMed ID: 27632276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.