BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34161937)

  • 1. Referring physician perspective on how to handle frequent use of CT imaging.
    Winford E; Bharija A
    J Radiol Prot; 2021 Aug; 41(3):. PubMed ID: 34161937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cumulative effective dose from recurrent CT examinations in Europe: proposal for clinical guidance based on an ESR EuroSafe Imaging survey.
    Frija G; Damilakis J; Paulo G; Loose R; Vano E;
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5514-5523. PubMed ID: 33710370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accounting for radiation exposure from previous CT exams while deciding on the next exam: What do referring clinicians think?
    Rehani MM; Applegate K; Bodzay T; Heon Kim C; Miller DL; Ali Nassiri M; Chul Paeng J; Srimahachota S; Srinivasa S; Takenaka M; Terez S; Vassileva J; Zhuo W
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Oct; 155():110468. PubMed ID: 35973303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emergency physicians' attitudes and preferences regarding computed tomography, radiation exposure, and imaging decision support.
    Griffey RT; Jeffe DB; Bailey T
    Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Jul; 21(7):768-77. PubMed ID: 25125272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Will CT ordering practices change if we educate residents about the potential effects of radiation exposure? Experience at a large academic medical center.
    Horowitz JM; Yaghmai V; Miller FH; Russell EJ
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1447-52. PubMed ID: 21889895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patients undergoing recurrent CT exams: assessment of patients with non-malignant diseases, reasons for imaging and imaging appropriateness.
    Rehani MM; Melick ER; Alvi RM; Doda Khera R; Batool-Anwar S; Neilan TG; Bettmann M
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Apr; 30(4):1839-1846. PubMed ID: 31792584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiphase acquisitions in pediatric abdominal-pelvic CT are a common practice and contribute to unnecessary radiation dose.
    Rostad BS; Applegate KE; Kim T; Mansour RM; Milla SS
    Pediatr Radiol; 2018 Nov; 48(12):1714-1723. PubMed ID: 29980861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Communicating radiation risk to patients and referring physicians in the emergency department setting.
    Shyu JY; Sodickson AD
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1061):20150868. PubMed ID: 26647958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks.
    Lee CI; Haims AH; Monico EP; Brink JA; Forman HP
    Radiology; 2004 May; 231(2):393-8. PubMed ID: 15031431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Radiation dose in computed tomography. Risks and challenges].
    Prokop M
    Radiologe; 2008 Mar; 48(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 18320163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patients undergoing multiphase CT scans and receiving a cumulative effective dose of ≥ 100 mSv in a single episode of care.
    Brambilla M; Cannillo B; D'Alessio A; Matheoud R; Agliata MF; Carriero A
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):4452-4458. PubMed ID: 33449187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed tomography and radiation: understanding the issues.
    Frush DP; Applegate K
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 17411538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ICRP publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology.
    ; Khong PL; Ringertz H; Donoghue V; Frush D; Rehani M; Appelgate K; Sanchez R
    Ann ICRP; 2013 Apr; 42(2):1-63. PubMed ID: 23218172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimization of radiation exposure due to computed tomography in inflammatory bowel disease.
    O'Neill SB; O'Connor OJ; McWilliams SR; Shanahan F; Maher MM
    Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2011 Feb; 35(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 21316328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Viewing Imaging Studies: How Patient Location and Imaging Site Affect Referring Physicians.
    Homayounieh F; Singh R; Chen T; Sugarman EJ; Schultz TJ; Digumarthy SR; Dreyer KJ; Kalra MK
    J Digit Imaging; 2020 Apr; 33(2):334-340. PubMed ID: 31515753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A snapshot of patients' awareness of radiation dose and risks associated with medical imaging examinations at an Australian radiology clinic.
    Singh N; Mohacsy A; Connell DA; Schneider ME
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 May; 23(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 28390555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Challenges for managing the cumulative effective dose for patients.
    Vano E
    Br J Radiol; 2020 Dec; 93(1116):20200814. PubMed ID: 32822543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A retrospective audit of cumulative ionising radiation levels in hospitalised pregnant patients.
    McEvoy-May JH; Bihari S; Hooker AM; Dixon DL
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Oct; 61(5):700-707. PubMed ID: 33772762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repeated radiological radiation exposure in patients undergoing surgery for urinary tract stone disease in Victoria, Australia.
    Manohar P; McCahy P
    BJU Int; 2011 Nov; 108 Suppl 2():34-7. PubMed ID: 22085124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The why, who, how, and what of communicating CT radiation risks to patients and healthcare providers.
    Mroueh N; Parakh A; Serrao J; Lee SI; Eisner BH; Gervais DA; Kambadakone AR; Sahani DV
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Apr; 48(4):1514-1525. PubMed ID: 36799998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.