These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34162430)
1. Development of the Paranormal and Supernatural Beliefs Scale using classical and modern test theory. Dean CE; Akhtar S; Gale TM; Irvine K; Wiseman R; Laws KR BMC Psychol; 2021 Jun; 9(1):98. PubMed ID: 34162430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [French validation of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale]. Bouvet R; Djeriouat H; Goutaudier N; Py J; Chabrol H Encephale; 2014 Sep; 40(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 24836860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring extraordinary experiences and beliefs: A validation and reliability study. Wahbeh H; Yount G; Vieten C; Radin D; Delorme A F1000Res; 2019; 8():1741. PubMed ID: 32518623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Erosion of belief and disbelief: effects of religiosity and negative affect on beliefs in the paranormal and supernatural. Beck R; Miller JP J Soc Psychol; 2001 Apr; 141(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 11372570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the Brief-BESTest Meet Classical Test Theory and Rasch Analysis Requirements for Balance Assessment in People With Neurological Disorders? Bravini E; Nardone A; Godi M; Guglielmetti S; Franchignoni F; Giordano A Phys Ther; 2016 Oct; 96(10):1610-1619. PubMed ID: 27103223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. THE DEPRESSION INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT SCALE: Assessment of Psychometric Properties Using Classical and Modern Measurement Theory in a CAN-BIND Trial. Vaccarino AL; Kalali AH; Blier P; Gilbert Evans S; Engelhardt N; Foster JA; Frey BN; Greist JH; Kobak KA; Lam RW; MacQueen G; Milev R; Müller DJ; Parikh SV; Placenza FM; Rizvi SJ; Rotzinger S; Sheehan DV; Sills T; Soares CN; Turecki G; Uher R; Williams JBW; Kennedy SH; Evans KR Innov Clin Neurosci; 2020 Jul; 17(7-9):30-40. PubMed ID: 33520402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Paranormal beliefs and religiosity: Chinese version of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale. Shiah YJ; Tam WC; Wu MH; Chang F Psychol Rep; 2010 Oct; 107(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 21117461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rasch analysis of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale: insights on dimensionality and suggestions for an improved 15-item version. Bravini E; Giordano A; Sartorio F; Ferriero G; Vercelli S Clin Rehabil; 2017 Apr; 31(4):532-543. PubMed ID: 27141086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rasch Analysis of the Proactive Personality Scale. Teye-Kwadjo E; de Bruin GP Psychol Rep; 2022 Oct; 125(5):2788-2806. PubMed ID: 34187235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and validation of a 6-item Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (RULS-6) using Rasch analysis. Wongpakaran N; Wongpakaran T; Pinyopornpanish M; Simcharoen S; Suradom C; Varnado P; Kuntawong P Br J Health Psychol; 2020 May; 25(2):233-256. PubMed ID: 31999891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychometric properties of the Beliefs About Adults with ID Scale in American physicians: Application of classical test and Rasch measurement theories. Bacherini A; Anselmi P; Havercamp SM; Balboni G J Intellect Disabil Res; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38740561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paranormal beliefs of Latvian college students: a Latvian version of the revised paranormal belief scale. Utinans A; Ancane G; Tobacyk JJ; Boyraz G; Livingston MM; Tobacyk JS Psychol Rep; 2015 Feb; 116(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 25621674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The development of an instrument to test pre-service teachers' beliefs consistent and inconsistent with self-regulation theory. Darmawan IGN; Vosniadou S; Lawson MJ; Van Deur P; Wyra M Br J Educ Psychol; 2020 Dec; 90(4):1039-1061. PubMed ID: 32196648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classical test theory and Rasch analysis validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index in subjects with upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Bravini E; Franchignoni F; Giordano A; Sartorio F; Ferriero G; Vercelli S; Foti C Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Jan; 96(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 25239282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Assessment of the Dimensionality and Factorial Structure of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale. Drinkwater K; Denovan A; Dagnall N; Parker A Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1693. PubMed ID: 29018398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose. Lindeman M; Svedholm-Häkkinen AM; Lipsanen J Cognition; 2015 Jan; 134():63-76. PubMed ID: 25460380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of Psychometric Properties of an Oral Health Care Measure of Cultural Competence Among Dental Students Using Rasch Partial Credit Model. Su Y; Behar-Horenstein LS J Dent Educ; 2018 Oct; 82(10):1105-1114. PubMed ID: 30275146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Paranormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skeptics. van Elk M Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):1041-6. PubMed ID: 23933505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of Quality of Life in Patients with Mycosis Fungoides/Sézary Syndrome Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: Development of an Electronic Instrument. McCaffrey S; Black RA; Nagao M; Sepassi M; Sharma G; Thornton S; Kim YH; Braverman J J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jan; 21(1):e11302. PubMed ID: 30617041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence, patterns and predictors of paranormal beliefs in The Netherlands: a several-analysts approach. Hoogeveen S; Borsboom D; Kucharský Š; Marsman M; Molenaar D; de Ron J; Sekulovski N; Visser I; van Elk M; Wagenmakers EJ R Soc Open Sci; 2024 Sep; 11(9):240049. PubMed ID: 39233722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]