These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34163719)

  • 1. Data-efficient machine learning for molecular crystal structure prediction.
    Wengert S; Csányi G; Reuter K; Margraf JT
    Chem Sci; 2021 Feb; 12(12):4536-4546. PubMed ID: 34163719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Theory meets Industry (Erwin-Schrödinger-Institute (ESI), Vienna, Austria, 12-14 June 2007).
    Hafner J
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2008 Feb; 20(6):060301. PubMed ID: 21693862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Machine-Learned Potentials by Active Learning from Organic Crystal Structure Prediction Landscapes.
    Butler PWV; Hafizi R; Day GM
    J Phys Chem A; 2024 Feb; 128(5):945-957. PubMed ID: 38277275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Machine Learning in QM/MM Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Condensed-Phase Systems.
    Böselt L; Thürlemann M; Riniker S
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 May; 17(5):2641-2658. PubMed ID: 33818085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved Description of Intra- and Intermolecular Interactions through Dispersion-Corrected Second-Order Møller-Plesset Perturbation Theory.
    Beran GJO; Greenwell C; Cook C; Řezáč J
    Acc Chem Res; 2023 Dec; 56(23):3525-3534. PubMed ID: 37963266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Graph-convolutional neural networks for (QM)ML/MM molecular dynamics simulations.
    Hofstetter A; Böselt L; Riniker S
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 Sep; 24(37):22497-22512. PubMed ID: 36106790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Machine-Learned Fragment-Based Energies for Crystal Structure Prediction.
    McDonagh D; Skylaris CK; Day GM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Apr; 15(4):2743-2758. PubMed ID: 30817152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid QM/MM approach for biomolecular systems under periodic boundary conditions: Combination of the density-functional tight-binding theory and particle mesh Ewald method.
    Nishizawa H; Okumura H
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Dec; 37(31):2701-2711. PubMed ID: 27718264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Crystal structure prediction of flexible pharmaceutical-like molecules: density functional tight-binding as an intermediate optimisation method and for free energy estimation.
    Iuzzolino L; McCabe P; Price SL; Brandenburg JG
    Faraday Discuss; 2018 Oct; 211(0):275-296. PubMed ID: 30035288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of molecular crystal structures by a crystallographic QM/MM model with full space-group symmetry.
    Mörschel P; Schmidt MU
    Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv; 2015 Jan; 71(Pt 1):26-35. PubMed ID: 25537386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multifidelity Statistical Machine Learning for Molecular Crystal Structure Prediction.
    Egorova O; Hafizi R; Woods DC; Day GM
    J Phys Chem A; 2020 Oct; 124(39):8065-8078. PubMed ID: 32881496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-Accuracy Semiempirical Quantum Models Based on a Minimal Training Set.
    Pham CH; Lindsey RK; Fried LE; Goldman N
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2022 Apr; 13(13):2934-2942. PubMed ID: 35343698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. TBMaLT, a flexible toolkit for combining tight-binding and machine learning.
    McSloy A; Fan G; Sun W; Hölzer C; Friede M; Ehlert S; Schütte NE; Grimme S; Frauenheim T; Aradi B
    J Chem Phys; 2023 Jan; 158(3):034801. PubMed ID: 36681630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benchmark and performance of long-range corrected time-dependent density functional tight binding (LC-TD-DFTB) on rhodopsins and light-harvesting complexes.
    Bold BM; Sokolov M; Maity S; Wanko M; Dohmen PM; Kranz JJ; Kleinekathöfer U; Höfener S; Elstner M
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2020 May; 22(19):10500-10518. PubMed ID: 31950960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Hybrid Machine Learning Approach for Structure Stability Prediction in Molecular Co-crystal Screenings.
    Wengert S; Csányi G; Reuter K; Margraf JT
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Jul; 18(7):4586-4593. PubMed ID: 35709378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A big data approach to the ultra-fast prediction of DFT-calculated bond energies.
    Qu X; Latino DA; Aires-de-Sousa J
    J Cheminform; 2013; 5():34. PubMed ID: 23849655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of structure and properties of molecular crystals from first principles.
    Szalewicz K
    Acc Chem Res; 2014 Nov; 47(11):3266-74. PubMed ID: 25354310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Δ-Quantum machine-learning for medicinal chemistry.
    Atz K; Isert C; Böcker MNA; Jiménez-Luna J; Schneider G
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 May; 24(18):10775-10783. PubMed ID: 35470831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.