230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3416522)
21. The European school of total hip arthroplasty and 35 years of total hip arthroplasty in the Czech Republic.
Cech O; Dzupa V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 15860155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Hydroxyapatite-coated tapered cementless femoral components in total hip arthroplasty.
Chambers B; St Clair SF; Froimson MI
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jun; 22(4 Suppl 1):71-4. PubMed ID: 17570282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Total hip replacement in the middle-aged patient. Contemporary cementing for fixation of the femoral component.
Harris WH
Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):611-6. PubMed ID: 8414426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Femoral cement pressurization during total hip arthroplasty. The role of different femoral stems with reference to stem size and shape.
Bourne RB; Oh I; Harris WH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Mar; (183):12-6. PubMed ID: 6697578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur.
Noble PC; Box GG; Kamaric E; Fink MJ; Alexander JW; Tullos HS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Jul; (316):31-44. PubMed ID: 7634721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Custom and modular components in primary total hip replacement.
McCarthy JC; Bono JV; O'Donnell PJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):162-71. PubMed ID: 9372768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cementless fixation of "isoelastic" hip endoprostheses manufactured from plastic materials.
Morscher EW; Dick W
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1983 Jun; (176):77-87. PubMed ID: 6851345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do.
Crowninshield RD; Maloney WJ; Wentz DH; Humphrey SM; Blanchard CR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Dec; (429):102-7. PubMed ID: 15577473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Total hip arthroplasty - The choice of the femoral component: cemented or uncemented?].
Fessy MH; Seutin B; Béjui J; Fischer LP
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 1996 Dec; 6(4):267-270. PubMed ID: 28315090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of rotation on the radiographic appearance of the femoral canal.
Eckrich SG; Noble PC; Tullos HS
J Arthroplasty; 1994 Aug; 9(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 7964774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The rationale, design characteristics, and preliminary results of a primary custom total hip prosthesis.
Stulberg SD; Stulberg BN; Wixson RL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Dec; (249):79-96. PubMed ID: 2684468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Radiologic changes of anatomic parameters of the proximal femur as a function of its position in rotation].
Rubin PJ; Leyvraz PF; Heegaard JH
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1989; 75(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 2781066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Cementless hip prosthesis design: a basic study and analysis of the proximal femur in normal Japanese people].
Fuku H
Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Sep; 68(9):763-73. PubMed ID: 7963930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fit the patient to the prosthesis. An argument against the routine use of custom hip implants.
Capello WN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Dec; (249):56-9. PubMed ID: 2684467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diversity of proximal femoral medullary canal.
Laine HJ; Lehto MU; Moilanen T
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jan; 15(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10654468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Materials selection and design for orthopaedic implants with improved long-term performance.
Vander Sloten J; Labey L; Van Audekercke R; Van der Perre G
Biomaterials; 1998 Aug; 19(16):1455-9. PubMed ID: 9794518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Strain distribution in the proximal human femur.
Leali A
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2002 Jan; 84(1):148. PubMed ID: 11837822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Critique and results of the hip prosthesis with an external cortical femoral support. Apropos of Y. Cirotteau's paper. June 28, 1989 meeting].
Barbin JY
Chirurgie; 1989; 115(7):476-9. PubMed ID: 2632158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Border-tracing algorithm implementation for the femoral geometry reconstruction.
Testi D; Zannoni C; Cappello A; Viceconti M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2001 Jun; 65(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 11339979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Anatomy of the proximal femur as seen with three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.
Traill MR; Kaufman DM; Runge VM; McCarthy JC; Wood ML; Sterns DM; Harasimowicz PP
J Arthroplasty; 1989 Dec; 4(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 2621469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
