These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34165264)
1. Additive Manufacturing of Multi-Scale Porous Soft Tissue Implants That Encourage Vascularization and Tissue Ingrowth. Coulter FB; Levey RE; Robinson ST; Dolan EB; Deotti S; Monaghan M; Dockery P; Coulter BS; Burke LP; Lowery AJ; Beatty R; Paetzold R; Prendergast JJ; Bellavia G; Straino S; Cianfarani F; Salamone M; Bruno CM; Moerman KM; Ghersi G; Duffy GP; O'Cearbhaill ED Adv Healthc Mater; 2021 Jul; 10(14):e2100229. PubMed ID: 34165264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel adaptive finite element algorithms to predict bone ingrowth in additive manufactured porous implants. Cheong VS; Fromme P; Mumith A; Coathup MJ; Blunn GW J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():230-239. PubMed ID: 30086415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bijel-templated implantable biomaterials for enhancing tissue integration and vascularization. Thorson TJ; Gurlin RE; Botvinick EL; Mohraz A Acta Biomater; 2019 Aug; 94():173-182. PubMed ID: 31233892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical effects of e-PTFE implant structure on soft tissue implantation stability: a study in the porcine model. Greene D; Pruitt L; Maas CS Laryngoscope; 1997 Jul; 107(7):957-62. PubMed ID: 9217139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo experiment. Taniguchi N; Fujibayashi S; Takemoto M; Sasaki K; Otsuki B; Nakamura T; Matsushita T; Kokubo T; Matsuda S Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Feb; 59():690-701. PubMed ID: 26652423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical characterization of structurally porous biomaterials built via additive manufacturing: experiments, predictive models, and design maps for load-bearing bone replacement implants. Melancon D; Bagheri ZS; Johnston RB; Liu L; Tanzer M; Pasini D Acta Biomater; 2017 Nov; 63():350-368. PubMed ID: 28927929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Therapeutic Engineered Hydrogel Coatings Attenuate the Foreign Body Response in Submuscular Implants. Harmon KA; Lane BA; Boone RE; Afshari A; Berdel HO; Yost MJ; Goodwin RL; Friedman HI; Eberth JF Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Jun; 80(6S Suppl 6):S410-S417. PubMed ID: 29746273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biocompatibility comparison of novel soft tissue implants vs commonly used biomaterials in a pig model. Kolb CM; Pierce LM; Roofe SB Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Sep; 147(3):456-61. PubMed ID: 22687327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tissue response to expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and silicone implants in a rabbit model. Batniji RK; Hutchison JL; Dahiya R; Lam SL; Williams EF Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2002; 4(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 12020206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hierarchical tailoring of strut architecture to control permeability of additive manufactured titanium implants. Zhang Z; Jones D; Yue S; Lee PD; Jones JR; Sutcliffe CJ; Jones E Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2013 Oct; 33(7):4055-62. PubMed ID: 23910314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early tissue reaction to textured breast implant surfaces. Brohim RM; Foresman PA; Hildebrandt PK; Rodeheaver GT Ann Plast Surg; 1992 Apr; 28(4):354-62. PubMed ID: 1596069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Partial Bone Formation in Additive Manufactured Porous Implants Reduces Predicted Stress and Danger of Fatigue Failure. Cheong VS; Fromme P; Coathup MJ; Mumith A; Blunn GW Ann Biomed Eng; 2020 Jan; 48(1):502-514. PubMed ID: 31549330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of cellular response to silicone implants in rats: implications for foreign-body carcinogenesis. James SJ; Pogribna M; Miller BJ; Bolon B; Muskhelishvili L Biomaterials; 1997 May; 18(9):667-75. PubMed ID: 9151998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Custom-made macroporous bioceramic implants based on triply-periodic minimal surfaces for bone defects in load-bearing sites. Charbonnier B; Manassero M; Bourguignon M; Decambron A; El-Hafci H; Morin C; Leon D; Bensidoum M; Corsia S; Petite H; Marchat D; Potier E Acta Biomater; 2020 Jun; 109():254-266. PubMed ID: 32194263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The biomechanical and histopathologic effects of surface texturing with silicone and polyurethane in tissue implantation and expansion. Barone FE; Perry L; Keller T; Maxwell GP Plast Reconstr Surg; 1992 Jul; 90(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 1615095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of strontium and silicon substituted hydroxyapatite electrochemical coatings on bone ingrowth and osseointegration of selective laser sintered porous metal implants. Mumith A; Cheong VS; Fromme P; Coathup MJ; Blunn GW PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227232. PubMed ID: 31923253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone and soft connective tissue response to porous acrylic implants. A histokinetic study. van Mullem PJ; de Wijn JR J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1988 Apr; 16(3):99-109. PubMed ID: 3164321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]