These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3416530)

  • 1. Design and fabrication of cementless hip stems.
    Walker PS; Robertson DD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):25-34. PubMed ID: 3416530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Closeness of fit of uncemented stems improves the strain distribution in the femur.
    Hua J; Walker PS
    J Orthop Res; 1995 May; 13(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 7602395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of cortical strain after cemented and press-fit proximal and distal femoral replacement.
    Hua J; Walker PS
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Sep; 10(5):739-44. PubMed ID: 1500986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems.
    Huiskes R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Dec; (261):27-38. PubMed ID: 2245558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fit of the uncemented femoral component and the use of cement influence the strain transfer the femoral cortex.
    Jasty M; O'Connor DO; Henshaw RM; Harrigan TP; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1994 Sep; 12(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 7931781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of press-fit femoral stems on strains in the femur. A photoelastic coating study.
    Zhou XM; Walker PS; Robertson DD
    J Arthroplasty; 1990 Mar; 5(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 2319252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
    Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro comparison of surface strain patterns in cementless femoral arthroplasty.
    Boggan RS
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1993 Jul; 4(3):143-53. PubMed ID: 10146280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strain shielding in proximal tibia of stemmed knee prosthesis: experimental study.
    Completo A; Fonseca F; Simões JA
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(3):560-6. PubMed ID: 18036530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems.
    Decking R; Puhl W; Simon U; Claes LE
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jun; 21(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 16457913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of distal stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented revision total hip prostheses.
    Kirk KL; Potter BK; Lehman RA; Xenos JS
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Oct; 36(10):545-9. PubMed ID: 18033566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modified transfemoral approach to revision arthroplasty with uncemented modular revision stems.
    Fink B; Grossmann A
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):32-55. PubMed ID: 17345026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond.
    Mann KA; Bartel DL; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Sep; 15(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 9420599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preclinical testing of total hip stems. The effects of coating placement.
    Huiskes R; van Rietbergen B
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):64-76. PubMed ID: 7554651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strategies for improving fixation of femoral components in total hip arthroplasty.
    Poss R; Walker P; Spector M; Reilly DT; Robertson DD; Sledge CB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):181-94. PubMed ID: 3416525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of interface condition and implant design on bone remodelling and failure risk for the resurfaced femoral head.
    Rothstock S; Uhlenbrock A; Bishop N; Laird L; Nassutt R; Morlock M
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1646-53. PubMed ID: 21511258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Femoral bone loss following hip replacement. A comparative study.
    Pritchett JW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 May; (314):156-61. PubMed ID: 7634629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.