These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34165355)

  • 1. Prepotent task-irrelevant semantic information is dampened by domain-specific control mechanisms during visual word recognition.
    Sulpizio S; Job R; Leoni P; Scaltritti M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Mar; 75(3):390-405. PubMed ID: 34165355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective suppression of taboo information in visual word recognition: Evidence for cognitive control on semantics.
    Scaltritti M; Job R; Sulpizio S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Jul; 47(7):934-945. PubMed ID: 34014713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; van der Meij R
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fast habituation to semantic interference generated by taboo connotation in reading aloud.
    Sulpizio S; Scaltritti M; Spinelli G
    Cogn Emot; 2024 Jan; ():1-16. PubMed ID: 38294682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prosody Dominates Over Semantics in Emotion Word Processing: Evidence From Cross-Channel and Cross-Modal Stroop Effects.
    Lin Y; Ding H; Zhang Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Mar; 63(3):896-912. PubMed ID: 32186969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semantic Stroop interference is modulated by the availability of executive resources: Insights from delta-plot analyses and cognitive load manipulation.
    Sulpizio S; Spinelli G; Scaltritti M
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38530621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When does reading dirty words impede picture processing? Taboo interference with verbal and manual responses.
    Mädebach A; Markuske AM; Jescheniak JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2301-2308. PubMed ID: 29790121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.
    O'Leary MJ; Barber PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):830-44. PubMed ID: 8409861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive style modulates semantic interference effects: evidence from field dependency.
    Nappo R; Romani C; De Angelis G; Galati G
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Mar; 237(3):755-768. PubMed ID: 30604021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic component of a cross-modal Stroop-like task.
    Stuart DM; Carrasco M
    Am J Psychol; 1993; 106(3):383-405. PubMed ID: 21957508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: what component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced?
    Augustinova M; Ferrand L
    Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):442-54. PubMed ID: 24387881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task.
    Hendrix P; Sun CC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):157-183. PubMed ID: 31999159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. You can't Stroop a lexical decision: is semantic processing fundamentally facilitative?
    Schmidt JR; Cheesman J; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 23205510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What's in a word? A parametric study of semantic influences on visual word recognition.
    Evans GA; Lambon Ralph MA; Woollams AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Apr; 19(2):325-31. PubMed ID: 22258820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-lasting attentional influence of negative and taboo words in an auditory variant of the emotional Stroop task.
    Bertels J; Kolinsky R; Pietrons E; Morais J
    Emotion; 2011 Feb; 11(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 21401222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic priming in the prime task effect: evidence of automatic semantic processing of distractors.
    Marí-Beffa P; Fuentes LJ; Catena A; Houghton G
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):635-47. PubMed ID: 10946546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing taboo words can result in early talker effects in word recognition for female listeners.
    Tuft SE; MᶜLennan CT; Krestar ML
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):435-448. PubMed ID: 27784198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distinct mechanisms underlying cross-modal semantic conflict and response conflict processing.
    Xu H; Yang G; Wu H; Xiao J; Li Q; Liu X
    Cereb Cortex; 2024 Jan; 34(2):. PubMed ID: 38212286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of valence in word processing: Evidence from lexical decision and emotional Stroop tasks.
    Crossfield E; Damian MF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jul; 218():103359. PubMed ID: 34198169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.
    White D; Risko EF; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1576-1581. PubMed ID: 26907601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.