These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34165586)
1. Effect of different resin removal methods on enamel after metal and ceramic bracket debonding : An in vitro micro-computed tomography study. Cesur E; Arslan C; Orhan AI; Bilecenoğlu B; Orhan K J Orofac Orthop; 2022 May; 83(3):157-171. PubMed ID: 34165586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study. Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):478. PubMed ID: 37443027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods. Vidor MM; Felix RP; Marchioro EM; Hahn L Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 25992989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets. Sinha PK; Nanda RS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system. Ghaleb L; Al-Worafi NA; Thawaba A; Abdulqader AA; Alkamel A; Abdo Y; Yang Z; Noman N; Al-Aroomi MA; Yulou T BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):358. PubMed ID: 38509532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis. Grzech-Leśniak K; Matys J; Żmuda-Stawowiak D; Mroczka K; Dominiak M; Brugnera Junior A; Gruber R; Romanos GE; Sculean A Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Nov; 36(11):595-600. PubMed ID: 29905504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding. Osorio R; Toledano M; García-Godoy F ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(5):313-7, 354. PubMed ID: 9795734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket. Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding. Cardoso LA; Valdrighi HC; Vedovello Filho M; Correr AB Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):105-12. PubMed ID: 25628087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur. Soares Tenório KC; Neupmann Feres MF; Tanaka CJ; Augusto MKM; Rodrigues JA; Pereira da Silva HD; Arana-Chavez VE; Roscoe MG Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):546-554. PubMed ID: 32493624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Enamel Surface Roughness after Bracket Debonding and Adhesive Resin Removal Using Different Burs with and without the Aid of a Magnifying Loupe. Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1091-1099. PubMed ID: 37073931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tooth color change due to different etching and debonding procedures. Gorucu-Coskuner H; Atik E; Taner T Angle Orthod; 2018 Nov; 88(6):779-784. PubMed ID: 30080125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study. Zarrinnia K; Eid NM; Kehoe MJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):284-93. PubMed ID: 7661146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs. Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket. Mundstock KS; Sadowsky PL; Lacefield W; Bae S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 10587597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enamel loss following ceramic bracket debonding: A quantitative analysis in vitro. Suliman SN; Trojan TM; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):651-6. PubMed ID: 25264580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy. Alessandri Bonetti G; Zanarini M; Incerti Parenti S; Lattuca M; Marchionni S; Gatto MR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 22051490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Loss of surface enamel after bracket debonding: an in-vivo and ex-vivo evaluation. Pont HB; Özcan M; Bagis B; Ren Y Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):387.e1-387.e9. PubMed ID: 20889035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Diode Laser Debonding of Ceramic Brackets on Enamel Surface and Pulpal Temperature. Yassaei S; Soleimanian A; Nik ZE J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Apr; 16(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 26067728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enamel surface roughness evaluation after bracket debonding: Comparison between light cure and self cure adhesive resin 3-Dimensional profilometric study. Chandrasekharan D; Sourabh C; Deenadayalan ; Praveen K Indian J Dent Res; 2022; 33(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 35946250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]