127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34165749)
1. Investigating the potential of Morris algorithm for improving the computational constraints of global sensitivity analysis.
Nabi S; Ahanger MA; Dar AQ
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Nov; 28(43):60900-60912. PubMed ID: 34165749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Employing sensitivity analysis to catchments having scanty data.
Nabi S; Ahanger MA; Dar AQ
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(45):68118-68131. PubMed ID: 35532823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Considerations and Caveats when Applying Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods to Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models.
Liu D; Li L; Rostami-Hodjegan A; Bois FY; Jamei M
AAPS J; 2020 Jul; 22(5):93. PubMed ID: 32681207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. To Sobol or not to Sobol? The effects of sampling schemes in systems biology applications.
Renardy M; Joslyn LR; Millar JA; Kirschner DE
Math Biosci; 2021 Jul; 337():108593. PubMed ID: 33865847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of global sensitivity analysis techniques based on a process-based model CROBAS.].
Xue HL; Tian XL; Wang B; Sun SC; Cao TJ
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2021 Jan; 32(1):134-144. PubMed ID: 33477221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Untangling the Molecular Interactions Underlying Intracellular Phase Separation Using Combined Global Sensitivity Analyses.
Gasior KI; Cogan NG
Bull Math Biol; 2024 Apr; 86(5):60. PubMed ID: 38641666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Personalization of models with many model parameters: an efficient sensitivity analysis approach.
Donders WP; Huberts W; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 26017545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applying a Global Sensitivity Analysis Workflow to Improve the Computational Efficiencies in Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.
Hsieh NH; Reisfeld B; Bois FY; Chiu WA
Front Pharmacol; 2018; 9():588. PubMed ID: 29937730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity analysis of infectious disease models: methods, advances and their application.
Wu J; Dhingra R; Gambhir M; Remais JV
J R Soc Interface; 2013 Sep; 10(86):20121018. PubMed ID: 23864497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parametric uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis in a model of the carotid bifurcation: Identification and ranking of most sensitive model parameters.
Gul R; Bernhard S
Math Biosci; 2015 Nov; 269():104-16. PubMed ID: 26367184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Time-dependent global sensitivity analysis of the C-RIVE biogeochemical model in contrasted hydrological and trophic contexts.
Wang S; Flipo N; Romary T
Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():341-355. PubMed ID: 30053625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating parameters of the variable infiltration capacity model using ant colony optimization.
Yue J; Pang B; Xu Z
Water Sci Technol; 2016; 74(4):985-93. PubMed ID: 27533872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity Analysis of a Mathematical Model Simulating the Post-Hepatectomy Hemodynamics Response.
Sala L; Golse N; Joosten A; Vibert E; Vignon-Clementel I
Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Jan; 51(1):270-289. PubMed ID: 36326994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Watershed model calibration framework developed using an influence coefficient algorithm and a genetic algorithm and analysis of pollutant discharge characteristics and load reduction in a TMDL planning area.
Cho JH; Lee JH
J Environ Manage; 2015 Nov; 163():2-10. PubMed ID: 26275596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accelerated global sensitivity analysis of genome-wide constraint-based metabolic models.
Nobile MS; Coelho V; Pescini D; Damiani C
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Apr; 22(Suppl 2):78. PubMed ID: 33902438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. pksensi: An R package to apply global sensitivity analysis in physiologically based kinetic modeling.
Hsieh NH; Reisfeld B; Chiu WA
SoftwareX; 2020; 12():. PubMed ID: 33426260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Methodology for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Activated Sludge Models: Case Study with Activated Sludge Model No. 3 (ASM3).
Fortela DLB; Farmer K; Zappi A; Sharp WW; Revellame E; Gang D; Zappi M
Water Environ Res; 2019 Sep; 91(9):865-876. PubMed ID: 31004529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity analysis in a radiological impact assessment of a nuclear power plant discharge. A comparison of the Morris, Spearman and Sobol' approaches.
Nicoulaud-Gouin V; Mourlon C; Tanaka T; Le Dizes-Maurel S; Garcia-Sanchez L; Attard JC; Zorko B; Mora JC; Simon-Cornu M
J Environ Radioact; 2022 Feb; 242():106770. PubMed ID: 34864504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A framework for 2-stage global sensitivity analysis of GastroPlus™ compartmental models.
Scherholz ML; Forder J; Androulakis IP
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2018 Apr; 45(2):309-327. PubMed ID: 29423863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity analysis and optimization of optical Y-branch structure parameters.
Zheng Y; Liu Z; Jiang L; Li J; Duan J
Appl Opt; 2020 Jul; 59(19):5803-5811. PubMed ID: 32609708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
