These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34166536)

  • 21. The subjective experience of recollection and familiarity in Alzheimer's disease.
    Kapogiannis D; El Haj M
    Behav Brain Sci; 2020 Jan; 42():e290. PubMed ID: 31896351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of encoding instruction and opportunity on the recollection of behaviourally relevant events.
    Broitman AW; Swallow KM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 May; 73(5):711-725. PubMed ID: 31747827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The contributions of spatial context and imagery to the recollection of single words.
    Lalla A; Robin J; Moscovitch M
    Hippocampus; 2020 Aug; 30(8):865-878. PubMed ID: 31782859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Age-related differences in subjective recollection: ERP studies of encoding and retrieval.
    Rollins L; Riggins T
    Dev Sci; 2018 May; 21(3):e12583. PubMed ID: 28677331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The word frequency effect in recognition memory versus repetition priming.
    Kinoshita S
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):569-80. PubMed ID: 7476243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development of subjective recollection: understanding of and introspection on memory States.
    Ghetti S; Mirandola C; Angelini L; Cornoldi C; Ciaramelli E
    Child Dev; 2011; 82(6):1954-69. PubMed ID: 21919894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Levels-of-processing effects on context and target recollection for words and pictures.
    Nieznański M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103127. PubMed ID: 32603912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Investigating the encoding-retrieval match in recognition memory: effects of experimental design, specificity, and retention interval.
    Dewhurst SA; Knott LM
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1101-9. PubMed ID: 21156873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time.
    Shaffer RA; McDermott KB
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107298. PubMed ID: 31838098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Familiarity and recollection in heuristic decision making.
    Schwikert SR; Curran T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Dec; 143(6):2341-65. PubMed ID: 25347534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Effects of initial familiarity and source recollection on confidence ratings of recognition memory].
    Yano M; Itoh Y
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2004 Oct; 75(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 15747552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A continuous source reinstatement model of true and false recollection.
    Johns BT; Jones MN; Mewhort DJK
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Mar; 75(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33856823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Critical tests of the continuous dual-process model of recognition.
    Cha J; Dobbins IG
    Cognition; 2021 Oct; 215():104827. PubMed ID: 34229131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection: an fMRI study.
    Morcom AM; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Dec; 24(12):2372-84. PubMed ID: 23110678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Continuous recollection versus unitized familiarity in associative recognition.
    Mickes L; Johnson EM; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):843-63. PubMed ID: 20565205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing recollection and familiarity in autistic spectrum disorders: methods and findings.
    Bigham S; Boucher J; Mayes A; Anns S
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2010 Jul; 40(7):878-89. PubMed ID: 20091339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pupil dilation during recognition reflects the subjective recollection/familiarity experience at test rather than the level of processing at encoding.
    Taikh A; Bodner GE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Sep; 76(3):186-192. PubMed ID: 35549359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Item repetition and response deadline affect familiarity and recollection differently across childhood.
    Koenig L; Wimmer MC; Trippas D
    Memory; 2020 Aug; 28(7):900-907. PubMed ID: 32657641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dissociation between the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity in the striatum and hippocampus: Across-study convergence.
    King DR; Chastelaine M; Elward RL; Wang TH; Rugg MD
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Nov; 354():1-7. PubMed ID: 28803854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Encoding focus does not affect recollection of action memories: Event related potential (ERP) and modeling evidence.
    Nardini CL; Leynes PA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jan; 147():9-17. PubMed ID: 31654698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.