These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34166755)

  • 1. Risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of behavioral interventions for substance use outcomes.
    Bo A; Hai AH; Chen DG; Hammock K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 139():20-27. PubMed ID: 34166755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Completeness of reporting of systematic reviews in the animal health literature: A meta-research study.
    Sargeant JM; Reynolds K; Winder CB; O'Connor AM
    Prev Vet Med; 2021 Oct; 195():105472. PubMed ID: 34438246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer's disease before and after PRISMA introduction.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Yu Y; Liu H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 30497417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged five years and under.
    Hodder RK; Stacey FG; Wyse RJ; O'Brien KM; Clinton-McHarg T; Tzelepis F; Nathan NK; James EL; Bartlem KM; Sutherland R; Robson E; Yoong SL; Wolfenden L
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Sep; 9(9):CD008552. PubMed ID: 28945919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive-behavioural therapy for a variety of conditions: an overview of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis.
    Fordham B; Sugavanam T; Edwards K; Hemming K; Howick J; Copsey B; Lee H; Kaidesoja M; Kirtley S; Hopewell S; das Nair R; Howard R; Stallard P; Hamer-Hunt J; Cooper Z; Lamb SE
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Feb; 25(9):1-378. PubMed ID: 33629950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of risk of bias assessment of trials in systematic reviews of oral health interventions, 1991-2014: A methodology study.
    Saltaji H; Ospina MB; Armijo-Olivo S; Agarwal S; Cummings GG; Amin M; Flores-Mir C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Sep; 147(9):720-728.e1. PubMed ID: 27155754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Generalizability of findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the Leading General Medical Journals.
    Malmivaara A
    J Rehabil Med; 2020 Mar; 52(3):jrm00031. PubMed ID: 32103277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reporting of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with a focus on drug safety: an empirical assessment.
    Hammad TA; Neyarapally GA; Pinheiro SP; Iyasu S; Rochester G; Dal Pan G
    Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 23508987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic review search methods evaluated using the Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews tool.
    de Kock S; Stirk L; Ross J; Duffy S; Noake C; Misso K
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Dec; 37():e18. PubMed ID: 33280626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effective components of exercise and physical activity-related behaviour-change interventions for chronic non-communicable diseases in Africa: protocol for a systematic mixed studies review with meta-analysis.
    Igwesi-Chidobe CN; Godfrey EL; Kengne AP
    BMJ Open; 2015 Aug; 5(8):e008036. PubMed ID: 26270945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis.
    Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S
    J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.
    Anglemyer A; Horvath HT; Bero L
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Apr; 2014(4):MR000034. PubMed ID: 24782322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta-epidemiology study.
    Luo S; Long Y; Xiao W; Wang X; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Du L; Chen M
    J Evid Based Med; 2020 Feb; 13(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 32112515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals.
    Marušić MF; Fidahić M; Cepeha CM; Farcaș LG; Tseke A; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):121. PubMed ID: 32423382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis with protocols in Diabetes Mellitus Type II: A systematic review.
    Rainkie DC; Abedini ZS; Abdelkader NN
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243091. PubMed ID: 33326429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.