These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34167003)

  • 1. On a new multi-source X-ray tube concept for minimizing imaging time in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Behling R
    Phys Med; 2021 Aug; 88():20-22. PubMed ID: 34167003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High resolution stationary digital breast tomosynthesis using distributed carbon nanotube x-ray source array.
    Qian X; Tucker A; Gidcumb E; Shan J; Yang G; Calderon-Colon X; Sultana S; Lu J; Zhou O; Spronk D; Sprenger F; Zhang Y; Kennedy D; Farbizio T; Jing Z
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2090-9. PubMed ID: 22482630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design and characterization of a spatially distributed multibeam field emission x-ray source for stationary digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Qian X; Rajaram R; Calderon-Colon X; Yang G; Phan T; Lalush DS; Lu J; Zhou O
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4389-99. PubMed ID: 19928069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prototype Multi-X-ray-source array (MXA) for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Becker AE; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Schwoebel PR
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235033. PubMed ID: 33080575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
    Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Carbon nanotube electron field emitters for x-ray imaging of human breast cancer.
    Gidcumb E; Gao B; Shan J; Inscoe C; Lu J; Zhou O
    Nanotechnology; 2014 Jun; 25(24):245704. PubMed ID: 24869902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. COMPARISON OF SPECTRA AND MEAN GLANDULAR DOSE WITH TUBE VOLTAGES USED IN DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS FROM SIMULATED, METROLOGICAL AND CLINICAL CASES.
    da Silveira Gatto LB; Braz D; Pacifico L; Travassos P; Magalhaes LAG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Dec; 192(3):402-412. PubMed ID: 33320943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental characterization of a direct conversion amorphous selenium detector with thicker conversion layer for dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast imaging.
    Scaduto DA; Tousignant O; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3965-3977. PubMed ID: 28543761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation exposure of digital breast tomosynthesis using an antiscatter grid compared with full-field digital mammography.
    Paulis LE; Lobbes MB; Lalji UC; Gelissen N; Bouwman RW; Wildberger JE; Jeukens CR
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Oct; 50(10):679-85. PubMed ID: 26011823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fixed gantry tomosynthesis system for radiation therapy image guidance based on a multiple source x-ray tube with carbon nanotube cathodes.
    Maltz JS; Sprenger F; Fuerst J; Paidi A; Fadler F; Bani-Hashemi AR
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1624-36. PubMed ID: 19544779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Second generation stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system with faster scan time and wider angular span.
    Calliste J; Wu G; Laganis PE; Spronk D; Jafari H; Olson K; Gao B; Lee YZ; Zhou O; Lu J
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4482-4495. PubMed ID: 28569999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
    Hu YH; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generation and analysis of clinically relevant breast imaging x-ray spectra.
    Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Nosratieh A; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2148-2160. PubMed ID: 28303582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Chen SC; Carton AK; Albert M; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Maidment AD
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 17236995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Workload and transmission data for the installation of a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Li X; Zhang D; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):063901. PubMed ID: 23718617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and feasibility studies of a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Yang G; Qian X; Phan T; Sprenger F; Sultana S; Calderon-Colon X; Kearse B; Spronk D; Lu J; Zhou O
    Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A; 2011 Aug; 648(Suppl 1):S220-S223. PubMed ID: 21808428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scatter radiation intensities around a clinical digital breast tomosynthesis unit and the impact on radiation shielding considerations.
    Yang K; Li X; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1096-110. PubMed ID: 26936697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital breast tomosynthesis: Image acquisition principles and artifacts.
    Sujlana PS; Mahesh M; Vedantham S; Harvey SC; Mullen LA; Woods RW
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():188-195. PubMed ID: 30236642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O thin-film transistor active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Kanicki J
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091902. PubMed ID: 25186389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.