176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34167120)
1. Increased Body Mass Index Is a Risk Factor for Poor Clinical Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy in Men with International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed with Systematic Biopsies.
Ferro M; Terracciano D; Musi G; de Cobelli O; Vartolomei MD; Damiano R; Cantiello F; Buonerba C; Morelli M; Mistretta FA; Luzzago S; Perdonà S; Del Prete P; Del Giudice F; Busetto GM; Porreca A; Autorino R; Manfredi M; Porpiglia F; Muto M; Loizzo D; Ditonno P; Battaglia M; Lucarelli G
Urol Int; 2022; 106(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 34167120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Circulating preoperative testosterone level predicts unfavourable disease at radical prostatectomy in men with International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group 1 prostate cancer diagnosed with systematic biopsies.
Ferro M; Lucarelli G; de Cobelli O; Vartolomei MD; Damiano R; Cantiello F; Crocerossa F; Perdonà S; Del Prete P; Cordima G; Musi G; Del Giudice F; Busetto GM; Chung BI; Porreca A; Ditonno P; Battaglia M; Terracciano D
World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1861-1867. PubMed ID: 32683462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical significance and risk factors of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade upgrading in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Takeshima Y; Yamada Y; Teshima T; Fujimura T; Kakutani S; Hakozaki Y; Kimura N; Akiyama Y; Sato Y; Kawai T; Yamada D; Kume H
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):501. PubMed ID: 33947348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.
Maxeiner A; Magheli A; Jöhrens K; Kilic E; Braun TL; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Stephan C; Miller K; Busch J
BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):750-757. PubMed ID: 26915345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biparametric Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.
Takeuchi N; Sakamoto S; Nishiyama A; Horikoshi T; Yamada Y; Iizuka J; Maimaiti M; Imamura Y; Kawamura K; Imamoto T; Komiya A; Ikehara Y; Akakura K; Ichikawa T
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):e817-e829. PubMed ID: 29576444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of the extent and location of positive surgical margins on the risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancers.
Matti B; Reeves F; Prouse M; Zargar-Shoshtari K
Prostate; 2021 Dec; 81(16):1428-1434. PubMed ID: 34570379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low body mass index is associated with adverse oncological outcomes following radical prostatectomy in Korean prostate cancer patients.
Koo KC; Yoon YE; Rha KH; Chung BH; Yang SC; Hong SJ
Int Urol Nephrol; 2014 Oct; 46(10):1935-40. PubMed ID: 24817520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.
Grogan J; Gupta R; Mahon KL; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Delprado W; Turner J; Horvath LG; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28371244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel nomogram to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 or ISUP GG2 prostate cancer, according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Cozzi G; Peveri G; Bagnardi V; Catellani M; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Pricolo P; Conti A; Alessi S; Marvaso G; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 32150328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Total testosterone density predicts high tumor load and disease reclassification of prostate cancer: results in 144 low-risk patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Shakir A; Amigoni N; Rizzetto R; Brunelli M; Migliorini F; Siracusano S; Artibani W
Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Dec; 51(12):2169-2180. PubMed ID: 31444696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of prostate health index to predict Gleason score upgrading and high-risk prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kim H; Jung G; Kim JH; Byun SS; Hong SK
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):17447. PubMed ID: 34465825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metabolic syndrome and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol are associated with adverse pathological features in patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy.
Lebdai S; Mathieu R; Leger J; Haillot O; Vincendeau S; Rioux-Leclercq N; Fournier G; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Doucet L; Azzouzi AR; Rigaud J; Renaudin K; Charles T; Bruyere F; Fromont G
Urol Oncol; 2018 Feb; 36(2):80.e17-80.e24. PubMed ID: 29153942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Does body habitus really make a difference ?
Albisinni S; Grosman J; Aoun F; Quackels T; Peltier A; Van Velthoven R; Roumeguère T
Prog Urol; 2018 Jun; 28(8-9):434-441. PubMed ID: 29789234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. BMI is associated with larger index tumors and worse outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Hayashi N; Matsushima M; Kido M; Naruoka T; Furuta A; Furuta N; Takahashi H; Egawa S
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2014 Sep; 17(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 24841331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of Lymph Node Invasion in Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Who Undergo Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: The Role of Obesity.
Tafuri A; Rizzetto R; Amigoni N; Sebben M; Shakir A; Gozzo A; Odorizzi K; Gallina S; Bianchi A; Ornaghi P; Brunelli M; Migliorini F; Cerruto MA; Artibani W; Siracusano S; Antonelli A; Porcaro AB
Urol Int; 2021; 105(5-6):362-369. PubMed ID: 33059351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of body mass index on clinicopathological outcome and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Narita S; Mitsuzuka K; Yoneyama T; Tsuchiya N; Koie T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Kaiho Y; Ohyama C; Tochigi T; Yamaguchi T; Habuchi T; Arai Y
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2013 Sep; 16(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 23752230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
