BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1051 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34167765)

  • 1. An integrated nomogram combining deep learning, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring, and clinical variables for identification of clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI: a retrospective multicentre study.
    Hiremath A; Shiradkar R; Fu P; Mahran A; Rastinehad AR; Tewari A; Tirumani SH; Purysko A; Ponsky L; Madabhushi A
    Lancet Digit Health; 2021 Jul; 3(7):e445-e454. PubMed ID: 34167765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploration of the diagnostic capacity of PSAMR combined with PI-RADS scoring for clinically significant prostate cancer and establishment and validation of the Nomogram prediction model.
    Li D; Zhang L; Xu Y; Wu X; Hua S; Jiang Y; Huang Q; Gao Y
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Oct; 149(13):11309-11317. PubMed ID: 37365430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a nomogram combining multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and PSA-related parameters to enhance the detection of clinically significant cancer across different region.
    Zhou Z; Liang Z; Zuo Y; Zhou Y; Yan W; Wu X; Ji Z; Li H; Hu M; Ma L
    Prostate; 2022 Apr; 82(5):556-565. PubMed ID: 35098557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of false-positive PI-RADS 5 lesions on prostate multiparametric MRI: development and internal validation of a clinical-radiological characteristics based nomogram.
    Cheng Y; Fan B; Fu Y; Yin H; Lu J; Li D; Li X; Qiu X; Guo H
    BMC Urol; 2024 Apr; 24(1):76. PubMed ID: 38566091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal PI-RADS 3 Lesions.
    Hectors SJ; Chen C; Chen J; Wang J; Gordon S; Yu M; Al Hussein Al Awamlh B; Sabuncu MR; Margolis DJA; Hu JC
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Nov; 54(5):1466-1473. PubMed ID: 33970516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
    Castellani D; Cecchini S; Mazzucchelli R; Soraci L; Di Rosa M; Fabbietti P; Palagonia E; Puccio F; Carnevali F; Paci E; Montironi R; Galosi AB
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 40(8):379.e1-379.e8. PubMed ID: 35662497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel nomogram to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 or ISUP GG2 prostate cancer, according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Cozzi G; Peveri G; Bagnardi V; Catellani M; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Pricolo P; Conti A; Alessi S; Marvaso G; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G
    BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 32150328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.
    Tamada T; Kido A; Yamamoto A; Takeuchi M; Miyaji Y; Moriya T; Sone T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 32614123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and validation of a nomogram based on biparametric MRI PI-RADS v2.1 and clinical parameters to avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies.
    Wang Y; Wang L; Tang X; Zhang Y; Zhang N; Zhi B; Niu X
    BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Aug; 23(1):106. PubMed ID: 37582697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting clinically significant prostate cancer with a deep learning approach: a multicentre retrospective study.
    Zhao L; Bao J; Qiao X; Jin P; Ji Y; Li Z; Zhang J; Su Y; Ji L; Shen J; Zhang Y; Niu L; Xie W; Hu C; Shen H; Wang X; Liu J; Tian J
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Feb; 50(3):727-741. PubMed ID: 36409317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Nomogram to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Targeted Biopsy for Index Lesion.
    Kim MJ; Park SY
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Apr; 55(4):1226-1233. PubMed ID: 34296803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting Benign Prostate Pathology on Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Men with a Prior Negative 12-core Systematic Biopsy: External Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram.
    Bjurlin MA; Renson A; Rais-Bahrami S; Truong M; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Taneja SS
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):815-822. PubMed ID: 29802053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deep-Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence for PI-RADS Classification to Assist Multiparametric Prostate MRI Interpretation: A Development Study.
    Sanford T; Harmon SA; Turkbey EB; Kesani D; Tuncer S; Madariaga M; Yang C; Sackett J; Mehralivand S; Yan P; Xu S; Wood BJ; Merino MJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Nov; 52(5):1499-1507. PubMed ID: 32478955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward an MRI-based nomogram for the prediction of transperineal prostate biopsy outcome: A physician and patient decision tool.
    Lee SM; Liyanage SH; Wulaningsih W; Wolfe K; Carr T; Younis C; Van Hemelrijck M; Popert R; Acher P
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):664.e11-664.e18. PubMed ID: 28801025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and validation of nomogram to improve the specificity of multiparametric MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Shiekh M; Houenstein H; Ramahi YO; Shabir U; Ghadersohi S; Zhu D; Zhu M; Jing Z; Attwood K; Kauffman E; Aboumohamed A; Guru K; Hussein AA
    Int J Urol; 2023 Oct; 30(10):876-882. PubMed ID: 37329258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biparametric Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.
    Takeuchi N; Sakamoto S; Nishiyama A; Horikoshi T; Yamada Y; Iizuka J; Maimaiti M; Imamura Y; Kawamura K; Imamoto T; Komiya A; Ikehara Y; Akakura K; Ichikawa T
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):e817-e829. PubMed ID: 29576444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Qualitative and Quantitative Reporting of a Unique Biparametric MRI: Towards Biparametric MRI-Based Nomograms for Prediction of Prostate Biopsy Outcome in Men With a Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer (IMPROD and MULTI-IMPROD Trials).
    Perez IM; Jambor I; Kauko T; Verho J; Ettala O; Falagario U; Merisaari H; Kiviniemi A; Taimen P; Syvänen KT; Knaapila J; Seppänen M; Rannikko A; Riikonen J; Kallajoki M; Mirtti T; Lamminen T; Saunavaara J; Pahikkala T; Boström PJ; Aronen HJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 51(5):1556-1567. PubMed ID: 31750988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.
    Zhai L; Fan Y; Sun S; Wang H; Meng Y; Hu S; Wang X; Yu W; Jin J
    Scand J Urol; 2018; 52(5-6):333-339. PubMed ID: 30895901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deep Learning Reconstruction Enables Highly Accelerated Biparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate.
    Johnson PM; Tong A; Donthireddy A; Melamud K; Petrocelli R; Smereka P; Qian K; Keerthivasan MB; Chandarana H; Knoll F
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jul; 56(1):184-195. PubMed ID: 34877735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of a Deep Learning-Accelerated vs. Conventional T2-Weighted Sequence in Biparametric MRI of the Prostate.
    Tong A; Bagga B; Petrocelli R; Smereka P; Vij A; Qian K; Grimm R; Kamen A; Keerthivasan MB; Nickel MD; von Busch H; Chandarana H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Oct; 58(4):1055-1064. PubMed ID: 36651358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 53.