These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3416804)

  • 1. The electromyographic signal as a measure of muscular force: a comparison of detection and quantification techniques.
    Philipson L; Larsson PG
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988; 28(2-3):141-50. PubMed ID: 3416804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of interelectrode distance on electromyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during isokinetic and isometric muscle actions of the biceps brachii.
    Beck TW; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Weir JP; Cramer JT; Coburn JW; Malek MH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Oct; 15(5):482-95. PubMed ID: 15935960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time-frequency analysis of SEMG--with special consideration to the interelectrode spacing.
    Alemu M; Kumar DK; Bradley A
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Dec; 11(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 14960108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeatability of surface EMG parameters at various isometric contraction levels and during fatigue using bipolar and Laplacian electrode configurations.
    Ollivier K; Portero P; Maïsetti O; Hogrel JY
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Oct; 15(5):466-73. PubMed ID: 15935958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Quantification of EMG with surface electrode leads; the results of a comparative evaluation using different procedures].
    Wawrzinoszek M; Kramer H
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1979; 25(9):670-4. PubMed ID: 516816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the electromyographic variables at different muscle lengths and contraction intensities.
    Forti F; Guirro RR
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2008; 48(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18338529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technical considerations for electromyographic research on the shoulder.
    Kelly BT; Cooper LW; Kirkendall DT; Speer KP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Feb; (335):140-51. PubMed ID: 9020213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating contraction level using root mean square amplitude in control subjects and patients with neuromuscular disorders.
    Boe SG; Rice CL; Doherty TJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):711-8. PubMed ID: 18374002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Studies of local muscular endurance capacity of isometric working muscles using electromyographic methods.
    Becher G; Mucke R; Kramer H; Drews I
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1983; 23(6):415-23. PubMed ID: 6641597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of electromyographic activity during eccentrically versus concentrically loaded isometric contractions.
    Garner JC; Blackburn T; Weimar W; Campbell B
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Jun; 18(3):466-71. PubMed ID: 17257859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of myoelectric signal processing on the relationship between muscle force and processed EMG.
    Siegler S; Hillstrom HJ; Freedman W; Moskowitz G
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1985; 25(7-8):499-512. PubMed ID: 4092659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fatigue analysis of the surface EMG signal in isometric constant force contractions using the averaged instantaneous frequency.
    Georgakis A; Stergioulas LK; Giakas G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 12665043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of a modified two-point backward difference to sequential event detection in surface electromyography.
    Niemenlehto PH; Juhola M
    J Med Eng Technol; 2009; 33(5):349-60. PubMed ID: 19440914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving EMG-based muscle force estimation by using a high-density EMG grid and principal component analysis.
    Staudenmann D; Kingma I; Daffertshofer A; Stegeman DF; van Dieën JH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Apr; 53(4):712-9. PubMed ID: 16602578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standard maximum isometric voluntary contraction tests for normalizing shoulder muscle EMG.
    Boettcher CE; Ginn KA; Cathers I
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Dec; 26(12):1591-7. PubMed ID: 18528827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EMG-force relationships in skeletal muscle.
    Perry J; Bekey GA
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1981; 7(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 7042199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electromyographic latencies associated with rapid maximal force production in five different muscle groups in college adults.
    Morris AF; Beaudet SM
    Am Correct Ther J; 1980; 34(4):116-21. PubMed ID: 7405777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from surface EMG signals during fatiguing dynamic contractions.
    Farina D; Pozzo M; Merlo E; Bottin A; Merletti R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Aug; 51(8):1383-93. PubMed ID: 15311823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Less is more: high pass filtering, to remove up to 99% of the surface EMG signal power, improves EMG-based biceps brachii muscle force estimates.
    Potvin JR; Brown SH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):389-99. PubMed ID: 15094152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bioelectric characteristics of the electromechanical delay preceding concentric contraction.
    Grabiner MD
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1986 Feb; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 3959862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.