160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34168297)
21. Risk factors and tumor characteristics of interval cancers by mammographic density.
Holm J; Humphreys K; Li J; Ploner A; Cheddad A; Eriksson M; Törnberg S; Hall P; Czene K
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(9):1030-7. PubMed ID: 25646195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study.
Wanders JOP; Holland K; Karssemeijer N; Peeters PHM; Veldhuis WB; Mann RM; van Gils CH
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Jun; 19(1):67. PubMed ID: 28583146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Interval Cancer Detection Using a Neural Network and Breast Density in Women with Negative Screening Mammograms.
Wanders AJT; Mees W; Bun PAM; Janssen N; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Dalmış MU; Karssemeijer N; van Gils CH; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM; van Rooden CJ
Radiology; 2022 May; 303(2):269-275. PubMed ID: 35133194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Tumour characteristics of screen-detected and interval cancers in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme: A mammographic breast density study.
Timmermans L; De Brabander I; Van Damme N; Bleyen L; Martens P; Van Herck K; Thierens H; Bacher K; Depypere H
Maturitas; 2022 Apr; 158():55-60. PubMed ID: 35241239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study.
Strand F; Humphreys K; Cheddad A; Törnberg S; Azavedo E; Shepherd J; Hall P; Czene K
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 27716311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by tumor characteristics: a case-control study.
Krishnan K; Baglietto L; Stone J; McLean C; Southey MC; English DR; Giles GG; Hopper JL
BMC Cancer; 2017 Dec; 17(1):859. PubMed ID: 29246131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Breast Cancers Detected at Screening MR Imaging and Mammography in Patients at High Risk: Method of Detection Reflects Tumor Histopathologic Results.
Sung JS; Stamler S; Brooks J; Kaplan J; Huang T; Dershaw DD; Lee CH; Morris EA; Comstock CE
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 27097237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by mode of detection and tumor size: a case-control study.
Krishnan K; Baglietto L; Apicella C; Stone J; Southey MC; English DR; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Jun; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 27316945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography.
Keller BM; Chen J; Daye D; Conant EF; Kontos D
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Aug; 17():117. PubMed ID: 26303303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Risk stratification of women with false-positive test results in mammography screening based on mammographic morphology and density: A case control study.
Winkel RR; Euler-Chelpin MV; Lynge E; Diao P; Lillholm M; Kallenberg M; Forman JL; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Nielsen M; Vejborg I
Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 49():53-60. PubMed ID: 28558329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study.
Astley SM; Harkness EF; Sergeant JC; Warwick J; Stavrinos P; Warren R; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Howell T; Evans DG
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 29402289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Automatic Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Calibration of Full-Field Digital Mammography: Feasibility on Japanese Women With and Without Breast Cancer.
Wang J; Kato F; Yamashita H; Baba M; Cui Y; Li R; Oyama-Manabe N; Shirato H
J Digit Imaging; 2017 Apr; 30(2):215-227. PubMed ID: 27832519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessing breast cancer risk within the general screening population: developing a breast cancer risk model to identify higher risk women at mammographic screening.
Abdolell M; Payne JI; Caines J; Tsuruda K; Barnes PJ; Talbot PJ; Tong O; Brown P; Rivers-Bowerman M; Iles S
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5417-5426. PubMed ID: 32358648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.
Glechner A; Wagner G; Mitus JW; Teufer B; Klerings I; Böck N; Grillich L; Berzaczy D; Helbich TH; Gartlehner G
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Mar; 3(3):CD009632. PubMed ID: 36999589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Left-right breast asymmetry and risk of screen-detected and interval cancers in a large population-based screening population.
Hudson SM; Wilkinson LS; De Stavola BL; Dos-Santos-Silva I
Br J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 93(1112):20200154. PubMed ID: 32525693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Breast cancer genetic risk profile is differentially associated with interval and screen-detected breast cancers.
Li J; Holm J; Bergh J; Eriksson M; Darabi H; Lindström LS; Törnberg S; Hall P; Czene K
Ann Oncol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):517-22. PubMed ID: 25488685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
