These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34169067)

  • 1. Dynamic Responses of Female Volunteers in Rear Impact Sled Tests at Two Head Restraint Distances.
    Carlsson A; Horion S; Davidsson J; Schick S; Linder A; Hell W; Svensson MY
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():684003. PubMed ID: 34169067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design and Evaluation of the Initial 50th Percentile Female Prototype Rear Impact Dummy, BioRID P50F - Indications for the Need of an Additional Dummy Size.
    Carlsson A; Davidsson J; Linder A; Svensson MY
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():687058. PubMed ID: 34336802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic kinematic responses of female volunteers in rear impacts and comparison to previous male volunteer tests.
    Carlsson A; Linder A; Davidsson J; Hell W; Schick S; Svensson M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):347-57. PubMed ID: 21823943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Motion of the head and neck of female and male volunteers in rear impact car-to-car impacts.
    Carlsson A; Siegmund GP; Linder A; Svensson MY
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(4):378-87. PubMed ID: 22817553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Average male and female virtual dummy model (BioRID and EvaRID) simulations with two seat concepts in the Euro NCAP low severity rear impact test configuration.
    Linder A; Holmqvist K; Svensson MY
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():62-70. PubMed ID: 28622848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anthropometric specifications, development, and evaluation of EvaRID--a 50th percentile female rear impact finite element dummy model.
    Carlsson A; Chang F; Lemmen P; Kullgren A; Schmitt KU; Linder A; Svensson MY
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(8):855-65. PubMed ID: 24484526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Occupant responses in conventional and ABTS seats in high-speed rear sled tests.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R; Prasad P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 28678610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The RID2 biofidelic rear impact dummy: a pilot study using human subjects in low speed rear impact full scale crash tests.
    Croft AC; Philippens MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Mar; 39(2):340-6. PubMed ID: 17094931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Second-row occupant responses with and without intrusion in rear sled and crash tests.
    Parenteau CS; Viano DC; Burnett R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 33289580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of initial seated position in low speed rear-end impacts: a comparison with the TNO rear impact dummy (TRID) model.
    Venkataramana MP; Hans SA; Bawab SY; Keifer OP; Woodhouse ML; Layson PD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 15823879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Internal loads in the cervical spine during motor vehicle rear-end impacts: the effect of acceleration and head-to-head restraint proximity.
    Tencer AF; Mirza S; Bensel K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jan; 27(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 11805633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neck forces and moments of human volunteers and post mortem human surrogates in low-speed frontal sled tests.
    Beeman SM; Kemper AR; Duma SM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():141-9. PubMed ID: 27586115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of standing or seated pelvis on dummy responses in rear impacts.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():423-31. PubMed ID: 22269526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of belt pretensioning on dummy responses in 40 km/h rear-impact sled tests.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 22239146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rebound after rear impacts.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 23343027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protection of children in forward-facing child restraint systems during oblique side impact sled tests: Intrusion and tether effects.
    Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Kim J; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():156-62. PubMed ID: 27586117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thoracic and lumbar spine responses in high-speed rear sled tests.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jul; 19(5):523-528. PubMed ID: 29494309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Seat properties affecting neck responses in rear crashes: a reason why whiplash has increased.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Sep; 4(3):214-27. PubMed ID: 14522646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional kinematic corridors of the head, spine, and pelvis for small female driver seat occupants in near- and far-side oblique frontal impacts.
    Humm JR; Yoganandan N; Driesslein KG; Pintar FA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S64-S69. PubMed ID: 30517033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of personal protection equipment, occupant body size, and restraint system on the frontal impact responses of Hybrid III ATDs in tactical vehicles.
    Zaseck LW; Orton NR; Gruber R; Rupp J; Scherer R; Reed M; Hu J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 18(6):642-649. PubMed ID: 28095025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.