These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34169394)

  • 1. Evaluation of log P, pK
    Bergazin TD; Tielker N; Zhang Y; Mao J; Gunner MR; Francisco K; Ballatore C; Kast SM; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):771-802. PubMed ID: 34169394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.
    Işık M; Bergazin TD; Fox T; Rizzi A; Chodera JD; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):335-370. PubMed ID: 32107702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overview of the SAMPL6 pK
    Işık M; Rustenburg AS; Rizzi A; Gunner MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Feb; 35(2):131-166. PubMed ID: 33394238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Precise force-field-based calculations of octanol-water partition coefficients for the SAMPL7 molecules.
    Fan S; Nedev H; Vijayan R; Iorga BI; Beckstein O
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):853-870. PubMed ID: 34232435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Energy-entropy prediction of octanol-water logP of SAMPL7 N-acyl sulfonamide bioisosters.
    Falcioni F; Kalayan J; Henchman RH
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):831-840. PubMed ID: 34244906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple linear regression models for predicting the n‑octanol/water partition coefficients in the SAMPL7 blind challenge.
    Lopez K; Pinheiro S; Zamora WJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Aug; 35(8):923-931. PubMed ID: 34251523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantum-mechanical property prediction of solvated drug molecules: what have we learned from a decade of SAMPL blind prediction challenges?
    Tielker N; Eberlein L; Hessler G; Schmidt KF; Güssregen S; Kast SM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Apr; 35(4):453-472. PubMed ID: 33079358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of octanol-water partition coefficients for the SAMPL6-[Formula: see text] molecules using molecular dynamics simulations with OPLS-AA, AMBER and CHARMM force fields.
    Fan S; Iorga BI; Beckstein O
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):543-560. PubMed ID: 31960254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting partition coefficients for the SAMPL7 physical property challenge using the ClassicalGSG method.
    Donyapour N; Dickson A
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):819-830. PubMed ID: 34181200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blind prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge.
    Bannan CC; Burley KH; Chiu M; Shirts MR; Gilson MK; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):927-944. PubMed ID: 27677750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stacking Gaussian processes to improve [Formula: see text] predictions in the SAMPL7 challenge.
    Raddi RM; Voelz VA
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Sep; 35(9):953-961. PubMed ID: 34363562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-phase Boltzmann weighting: accounting for local inhomogeneity in molecular simulations of water-octanol partition coefficients in the SAMPL6 challenge.
    Krämer A; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):471-483. PubMed ID: 32060677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SAMPL7 Host-Guest Challenge Overview: assessing the reliability of polarizable and non-polarizable methods for binding free energy calculations.
    Amezcua M; El Khoury L; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 33392951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A deep learning approach for the blind logP prediction in SAMPL6 challenge.
    Prasad S; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):535-542. PubMed ID: 32002779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Atomic Charges on Octanol-Water Partition Coefficient Using Alchemical Free Energy Calculation.
    Ogata K; Hatakeyama M; Nakamura S
    Molecules; 2018 Feb; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 29462850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring experimental cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients for the SAMPL5 challenge.
    Rustenburg AS; Dancer J; Lin B; Feng JA; Ortwine DF; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):945-958. PubMed ID: 27718028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An explicit-solvent hybrid QM and MM approach for predicting pKa of small molecules in SAMPL6 challenge.
    Prasad S; Huang J; Zeng Q; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1191-1201. PubMed ID: 30276503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating multiscale and machine learning approaches towards the SAMPL9 log 
    Draper MR; Waterman A; Dannatt JE; Patel P
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 Feb; 26(9):7907-7919. PubMed ID: 38376855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SAMPL6 challenge results from [Formula: see text] predictions based on a general Gaussian process model.
    Bannan CC; Mobley DL; Skillman AG
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1165-1177. PubMed ID: 30324305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated potentiometric titrations in KCl/water-saturated octanol: method for quantifying factors influencing ion-pair partitioning.
    Scherrer RA; Donovan SF
    Anal Chem; 2009 Apr; 81(7):2768-78. PubMed ID: 19265385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.