These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34169657)

  • 1. Using clinical trial registries to inform Copas selection model for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Huang A; Komukai S; Friede T; Hattori S
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Sep; 12(5):658-673. PubMed ID: 34169657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies for a continuous biomarker.
    Hattori S; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):327-342. PubMed ID: 28990209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis.
    Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Rücker G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 19836925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis via inverse probability weighting using clinical trial registries.
    Huang A; Morikawa K; Friede T; Hattori S
    Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2089-2102. PubMed ID: 36602873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximum likelihood estimation and EM algorithm of Copas-like selection model for publication bias correction.
    Ning J; Chen Y; Piao J
    Biostatistics; 2017 Jul; 18(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 28334132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the sensitivity of meta-analysis to selection bias: a multiple imputation approach.
    Carpenter J; Rücker G; Schwarzer G
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1066-72. PubMed ID: 21039395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2113-26. PubMed ID: 12820277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.
    Song F; Khan KS; Dinnes J; Sutton AJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 31(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 11914301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A confidence interval robust to publication bias for random-effects meta-analysis of few studies.
    Henmi M; Hattori S; Friede T
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Sep; 12(5):674-679. PubMed ID: 33576574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A fully Bayesian application of the Copas selection model for publication bias extended to network meta-analysis.
    Mavridis D; Sutton A; Cipriani A; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2013 Jan; 32(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 22806991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Lin L; Chu H
    Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):785-794. PubMed ID: 29141096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The trim-and-fill method for publication bias: practical guidelines and recommendations based on a large database of meta-analyses.
    Shi L; Lin L
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(23):e15987. PubMed ID: 31169736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Copas-like selection model to correct publication bias in systematic review of diagnostic test studies.
    Piao J; Liu Y; Chen Y; Ning J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019; 28(10-11):2912-2923. PubMed ID: 30062910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods for addressing publication bias in school psychology journals: A descriptive review of meta-analyses from 1980 to 2019.
    McClain MB; Callan GL; Harris B; Floyd RG; Haverkamp CR; Golson ME; Longhurst DN; Benallie KJ
    J Sch Psychol; 2021 Feb; 84():74-94. PubMed ID: 33581772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study.
    Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Ades AE; Stanley TD; Abrams KR; Peters JL; Cooper NJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jan; 9():2. PubMed ID: 19138428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis.
    Lin L; Chu H; Murad MH; Hong C; Qu Z; Cole SR; Chen Y
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1260-1267. PubMed ID: 29663281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A selection model for accounting for publication bias in a full network meta-analysis.
    Mavridis D; Welton NJ; Sutton A; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(30):5399-412. PubMed ID: 25316006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.