These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34169657)

  • 21. Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis.
    Lin L; Chu H; Murad MH; Hong C; Qu Z; Cole SR; Chen Y
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1260-1267. PubMed ID: 29663281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A selection model for accounting for publication bias in a full network meta-analysis.
    Mavridis D; Welton NJ; Sutton A; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(30):5399-412. PubMed ID: 25316006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is there a "best" way to detect and minimize publication bias? An empirical evaluation.
    Pham B; Platt R; McAuley L; Klassen TP; Moher D
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Jun; 24(2):109-25. PubMed ID: 11523382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Examining how meta-analytic methods perform in the presence of bias: A simulation study.
    Bramley P; López-López JA; Higgins JPT
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Nov; 12(6):816-830. PubMed ID: 34327842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.
    Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Approaches to Assessing and Adjusting for Selective Outcome Reporting in Meta-analysis.
    Jackson JL; Balk EM; Hyun N; Kuriyama A
    J Gen Intern Med; 2022 Apr; 37(5):1247-1253. PubMed ID: 34669145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detecting and correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis - A truncated normal distribution approach.
    Zhu Q; Carriere KC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2722-2741. PubMed ID: 28024447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accounting for publication bias using a bivariate trim and fill meta-analysis procedure.
    Luo C; Marks-Anglin A; Duan R; Lin L; Hong C; Chu H; Chen Y
    Stat Med; 2022 Aug; 41(18):3466-3478. PubMed ID: 35574857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses.
    Sutton AJ; Duval SJ; Tweedie RL; Abrams KR; Jones DR
    BMJ; 2000 Jun; 320(7249):1574-7. PubMed ID: 10845965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
    Furuya-Kanamori L; Barendregt JJ; Doi SAR
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2018 Dec; 16(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 29621038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. EMBRACE: An EM-based bias reduction approach through Copas-model estimation for quantifying the evidence of selective publishing in network meta-analysis.
    Marks-Anglin A; Luo C; Piao J; Gibbons MBC; Schmid CH; Ning J; Chen Y
    Biometrics; 2022 Jun; 78(2):754-765. PubMed ID: 33559881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey.
    Ahmed I; Sutton AJ; Riley RD
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7762. PubMed ID: 22214758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots.
    Simmonds M
    Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; 4():24. PubMed ID: 25875027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Duval S; Tweedie R
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):455-63. PubMed ID: 10877304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Practical considerations on detection of publication bias].
    Palma Pérez S; Delgado Rodríguez M
    Gac Sanit; 2006 Dec; 20 Suppl 3():10-6. PubMed ID: 17433196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Confidence intervals and P-values for meta-analysis with publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB; Eguchi S
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 17688500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications.
    Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Turner EH; Abrams KR; Cooper NJ; Palmer TM; Ades AE
    BMJ; 2009 Aug; 339():b2981. PubMed ID: 19666685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using pseudo-data to correct for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Bowden J; Thompson JR; Burton P
    Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3798-813. PubMed ID: 16382418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.
    Vavken P; Dorotka R
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21360256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.