These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34169753)

  • 1. When two actors perform different tasks: Still no evidence for shared task-sets in joint task switching.
    Yamaguchi M; Shah HH; Hommel B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Nov; 74(11):1914-1923. PubMed ID: 34169753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No evidence for shared representations of task sets in joint task switching.
    Yamaguchi M; Wall HJ; Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 2017 Nov; 81(6):1166-1177. PubMed ID: 27744585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Action-effect sharing induces task-set sharing in joint task switching.
    Yamaguchi M; Wall HJ; Hommel B
    Cognition; 2017 Aug; 165():113-120. PubMed ID: 28535468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The roles of action selection and actor selection in joint task settings.
    Yamaguchi M; Wall HJ; Hommel B
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():184-192. PubMed ID: 30340087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sharing tasks or sharing actions? Evidence from the joint Simon task.
    Yamaguchi M; Wall HJ; Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 2018 Mar; 82(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 27826655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for a multicomponent hierarchical representation of dual tasks.
    Hirsch P; Roesch C; Koch I
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Feb; 49(2):350-363. PubMed ID: 32989661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The development of co-representation effects in a joint task: do children represent a co-actor?
    Milward SJ; Kita S; Apperly IA
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 24853630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Co-actors represent each other's task regularity through social statistical learning.
    Zheng Z; Wang J
    Cognition; 2023 Jun; 235():105411. PubMed ID: 36821997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neuroimaging of the joint Simon effect with believed biological and non-biological co-actors.
    Wen T; Hsieh S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():483. PubMed ID: 26388760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.
    Klempova B; Liepelt R
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):449-63. PubMed ID: 25833374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The surface structure and the deep structure of sequential control: what can we learn from task span switch costs?
    Mayr U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):693-8. PubMed ID: 21037168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Instructed Task-Switch Evaluation Effect: Is the Instruction to Switch Tasks Sufficient to Dislike Task Switch Cues?
    Van Dessel P; Liefooghe B; De Houwer J
    J Cogn; 2020 Jan; 3(1):1. PubMed ID: 31934683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The joint flanker effect and the joint Simon effect: On the comparability of processes underlying joint compatibility effects.
    Dittrich K; Bossert ML; Rothe-Wulf A; Klauer KC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1808-1823. PubMed ID: 27357224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What it costs to implement a plan: plan-level and task-level contributions to switch costs.
    Logan GD
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jun; 35(4):591-602. PubMed ID: 17848017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task switching costs in preschool children and adults.
    Peng A; Kirkham NZ; Mareschal D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Aug; 172():59-72. PubMed ID: 29587131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs.
    Gajewski PD; Kleinsorge T; Falkenstein M
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1138-48. PubMed ID: 19717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential effects of articulatory suppression on cue-switch and task-switch trials in random task cueing with 2:1 mapping.
    Saeki E; Saito S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1599-614. PubMed ID: 22506894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The double task-switching protocol: An investigation into the effects of similarity and conflict on cognitive flexibility in the context of mental fatigue.
    Hinss MF; Brock AM; Roy RN
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0279021. PubMed ID: 36827288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Switch-Independent Task Representations in Frontal and Parietal Cortex.
    Loose LS; Wisniewski D; Rusconi M; Goschke T; Haynes JD
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(33):8033-8042. PubMed ID: 28729441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When co-action eliminates the Simon effect: disentangling the impact of co-actor's presence and task sharing on joint-task performance.
    Sellaro R; Treccani B; Rubichi S; Cubelli R
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():844. PubMed ID: 24312066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.