115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3417082)
1. [Prognostic value of the Lauren and Ming classifications in gastric adenocarcinoma. Multidimensional analysis].
Garnier P; Vielh P; Asselain B; Durand JC; Girodet J; Pilleron JP; Salmon RJ
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1988; 12(6-7):553-8. PubMed ID: 3417082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Lauren's, Ming's and WHO histological classifications of gastric cancer as a prognostic factor for operated patients.
Cimerman M; Repse S; Jelenc F; Omejc M; Bitenc M; Lamovec J
Int Surg; 1994; 79(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 8063551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Prognostic value of histologic classifications of advanced stomach cancer: comparative study of Lauren's and Goseki's classifications].
Guglielmi A; de Manzoni G; Tomezzoli A; Ricci F; Pelosi G; Laterza E; Di Leo A; Bonfiglio M
Chir Ital; 1997; 49(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 9612652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current concepts in gastric cancer surgery.
Schumacher IK; Hunsicker A; Youssef PS; Lorenz D
Saudi Med J; 2002 Jan; 23(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 11938366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adenocarcinoma in the middle third of the stomach--an evaluation for the prognostic significance of clinicopathological features.
Sheen-Chen SM; Chou CW; Chen MC; Chen FC; Chen YS; Chen JJ
Hepatogastroenterology; 1997; 44(17):1488-94. PubMed ID: 9356878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Prognostic factors in resected stomach carcinoma].
Oertli D; Herzog U; Tondelli P
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1994 Jun; 124(22):945-52. PubMed ID: 7518097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Correlation of histological classifications of gastric carcinomas with location and prognosis].
Calli Demirkan N; Tunçyürek M; Ugur Ertan E; Bülent Alkanat M; Içöz G
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2002; 26(6-7):610-5. PubMed ID: 12193861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The value of metastatic lymph nodes ratio in predicting the prognosis of patients with T3 gastric carcinoma].
Yu JX; Wu YL; Yang LT
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 85(13):922-5. PubMed ID: 16029534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Goseki classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia].
De Manzoni G; Pedrazzani C; Di Leo A; Bonfiglio M; Zerman G; Tasselli S; Borzellino G
Minerva Chir; 2002 Aug; 57(4):449-55. PubMed ID: 12145574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Metastatic lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer.
Asoglu O; Karanlik H; Parlak M; Kecer M; Muslumanoglu M; Igci A; Ozmen V; Gulluoglu M; Kapran Y
Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(91-92):908-13. PubMed ID: 19621727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature.
Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Rossi S; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Nigri G; Ercolani G; De Angelis R; Ramacciato G
Am Surg; 2007 Apr; 73(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 17439029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of splenectomy on survival following gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma.
Clark JL; Saenz RH; Nava HR; Douglass HO
Am Surg; 1991 Aug; 57(8):496-501. PubMed ID: 1718195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early gastric cancer: univariate and multivariate analysis for survival.
Tuech JJ; Cervi C; Pessaux P; Villapadierna F; Bergamaschi R; Ronceray J; Arnaud JP
Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(30):3276-80. PubMed ID: 10626201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Prognostic factors in cardia cancer].
Miholic J; Moeschl P; Schwarz C; Klepetko W; Neuhold N; Scheiber V; Stellwag-Carion F; Wolner E
Chirurg; 1987 Oct; 58(10):656-62. PubMed ID: 3677882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survival analysis after surgical treatment of gastric cancer: review of 121 cases.
Nazli O; Derici H; Tansug T; Yaman I; Bozdag AD; Isgüder AS; Bölükbasi H
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007 Mar; 54(74):625-9. PubMed ID: 17523337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinicopathologic features of the patients with node-negative metastasis gastric adenocarcinoma and their survival analysis].
Li J; Cai SR; He YL; Huang MJ; Mei KY; Wang JP; Zhan WH
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 May; 9(3):230-3. PubMed ID: 16721684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage in gastric carcinoma.
Kato M; Saji S; Kawaguchi Y; Kunieda K; Sugiyama Y; Takagi Y; Hiraoka T; Kumazawa I; Adachi T
Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(30):3281-6. PubMed ID: 10626202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between site N-category and number N-category for nodal staging in carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: our experience and literature review.
Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Nigri G; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Ruzzetti R; Ramacciato G
Am Surg; 2006 Feb; 72(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 16536239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Gastric carcinoma: a histopathological study of 705 cases].
Leocata P; Ventura L; Giunta M; Guadagni S; Fortunato C; Discepoli S; Ventura T
Ann Ital Chir; 1998; 69(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 9835105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gastric cancer: correlation between clinicopathological factors and survival of patients. II.
Lazăr D; Tăban S; Sporea I; Dema A; Cornianu M; Lazăr E; Goldiş A; Vernic C
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2009; 50(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 19434309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
