These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34170828)
1. Designing With Pictographs: Envision Topics Without Sacrificing Understanding. Burns A; Xiong C; Franconeri S; Cairo A; Mahyar N IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2022 Dec; 28(12):4515-4530. PubMed ID: 34170828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of pictographs depicting medication use instructions for low-literacy medical clinic ambulatory patients. Chuang MH; Lin CL; Wang YF; Cham TM J Manag Care Pharm; 2010 Jun; 16(5):337-45. PubMed ID: 20518586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences. Price M; Cameron R; Butow P Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High Numerates Count Icons and Low Numerates Process Large Areas in Pictographs: Results of an Eye-Tracking Study. Kreuzmair C; Siegrist M; Keller C Risk Anal; 2016 Aug; 36(8):1599-614. PubMed ID: 26800006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Animated graphics for comparing two risks: a cautionary tale. Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Witteman HO; Fuhrel-Forbis A; Exe NL; Kahn VC; Dickson M J Med Internet Res; 2012 Jul; 14(4):e106. PubMed ID: 22832208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a pictograph enhancement system for patient instruction: a recall study. Zeng-Treitler Q; Perri S; Nakamura C; Kuang J; Hill B; Bui DD; Stoddard GJ; Bray BE J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014; 21(6):1026-31. PubMed ID: 25301809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study. McCaffery KJ; Dixon A; Hayen A; Jansen J; Smith S; Simpson JM Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 22074912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using animated computer-generated text and graphics to depict the risks and benefits of medical treatment. Tait AR; Voepel-Lewis T; Brennan-Martinez C; McGonegal M; Levine R Am J Med; 2012 Nov; 125(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 22939094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of pictographs developed through a participatory design process using an online survey tool. Kim H; Nakamura C; Zeng-Treitler Q J Med Internet Res; 2009 Feb; 11(1):e5. PubMed ID: 19275981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating the presentation of uncertainty in an icon array: A randomized trial. Recchia G; Lawrence ACE; Freeman ALJ PEC Innov; 2022 Dec; 1():None. PubMed ID: 36518604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Doodle Health: A Crowdsourcing Game for the Co-design and Testing of Pictographs to Reduce Disparities in Healthcare Communication. Christensen C; Redd D; Lake E; Shipman JP; Aiono H; Altizer R; Bray BE; Zeng QT AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():585-594. PubMed ID: 29854123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neural correlates for aesthetic appraisal of pictograph and its referent: An fMRI study. Zhang W; Lai S; He X; Zhao X; Lai S Behav Brain Res; 2016 May; 305():229-38. PubMed ID: 26952886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of pictographs in improving patient education outcomes: a systematic review. Wang T; Voss JG Health Educ Res; 2021 Mar; 36(1):9-40. PubMed ID: 33331898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does Iconicity in Pictographs Matter? The Influence of Iconicity and Numeracy on Information Processing, Decision Making, and Liking in an Eye-Tracking Study. Kreuzmair C; Siegrist M; Keller C Risk Anal; 2017 Mar; 37(3):546-556. PubMed ID: 27089046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A demonstration of ''less can be more'' in risk graphics. Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Fagerlin A; Ubel PA Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(6):661-71. PubMed ID: 20375419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of numeracy on verbatim knowledge of the longitudinal risk for prostate cancer recurrence following radiation therapy. Hamstra DA; Johnson SB; Daignault S; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Taylor JM; Larkin K; Wood A; Fagerlin A Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 25277673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does Animation Improve Comprehension of Risk Information in Patients with Low Health Literacy? A Randomized Trial. Housten AJ; Kamath GR; Bevers TB; Cantor SB; Dixon N; Hite A; Kallen MA; Leal VB; Li L; Volk RJ Med Decis Making; 2020 Jan; 40(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 31795820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of alcohol label designs with different pictorial representations of alcohol content and health warnings on knowledge and understanding of low-risk drinking guidelines: a randomized controlled trial. Gold N; Egan M; Londakova K; Mottershaw A; Harper H; Burton R; Henn C; Smolar M; Walmsley M; Arambepola R; Watson R; Bowen S; Greaves F Addiction; 2021 Jun; 116(6):1443-1459. PubMed ID: 33169443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of format on parents' understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: a comparison between text, tables, and graphics. Tait AR; Voepel-Lewis T; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Fagerlin A J Health Commun; 2010 Jul; 15(5):487-501. PubMed ID: 20677054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of format and content of visual display of data on comprehension, choice and preference: a systematic review. Hildon Z; Allwood D; Black N Int J Qual Health Care; 2012 Feb; 24(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 22166856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]