201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34171135)
1. Form-Specific and Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment of 3 Engineered Nanomaterials (Nano-Ag, Nano-TiO
Hong H; Adam V; Nowack B
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2021 Sep; 40(9):2629-2639. PubMed ID: 34171135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Engineered nanomaterials in water and soils: a risk quantification based on probabilistic exposure and effect modeling.
Gottschalk F; Kost E; Nowack B
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Jun; 32(6):1278-87. PubMed ID: 23418073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Considering the forms of released engineered nanomaterials in probabilistic material flow analysis.
Adam V; Caballero-Guzman A; Nowack B
Environ Pollut; 2018 Dec; 243(Pt A):17-27. PubMed ID: 30170204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental risk assessment of engineered nano-SiO
Wang Y; Nowack B
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 May; 37(5):1387-1395. PubMed ID: 29315795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Probabilistic environmental risk assessment of five nanomaterials (nano-TiO2, nano-Ag, nano-ZnO, CNT, and fullerenes).
Coll C; Notter D; Gottschalk F; Sun T; Som C; Nowack B
Nanotoxicology; 2016; 10(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 26554717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Material-specific properties applied to an environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials - implications on grouping and read-across concepts.
Wigger H; Nowack B
Nanotoxicology; 2019 Jun; 13(5):623-643. PubMed ID: 30727799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrated dynamic probabilistic material flow analysis of engineered materials in all European countries.
Adam V; Wu Q; Nowack B
NanoImpact; 2021 Apr; 22():100312. PubMed ID: 35559969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of species sensitivity distribution modeling approaches for environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials - A case study for silver and titanium dioxide representative materials.
Sørensen SN; Wigger H; Zabeo A; Semenzin E; Hristozov D; Nowack B; Spurgeon DJ; Baun A
Aquat Toxicol; 2020 Aug; 225():105543. PubMed ID: 32585540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Possibilities and limitations of modeling environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials by probabilistic material flow analysis.
Gottschalk F; Sonderer T; Scholz RW; Nowack B
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2010 May; 29(5):1036-48. PubMed ID: 20821538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic probabilistic material flow analysis of engineered nanomaterials in European waste treatment systems.
Rajkovic S; Bornhöft NA; van der Weijden R; Nowack B; Adam V
Waste Manag; 2020 Jul; 113():118-131. PubMed ID: 32531660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Integrated Testing Strategy for Ecotoxicity (ITS-ECO) Assessment in the Marine Environmental Compartment using Mytilus spp.: A Case Study using Pristine and Coated CuO and TiO
Connolly M; Little S; Hartl MGJ; Fernandes TF
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Jun; 41(6):1390-1406. PubMed ID: 35226375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analysis of Bioaccumulation Data for Nondissolvable Engineered Nanomaterials in Freshwater Aquatic Organisms.
Zheng Y; Nowack B
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 May; 41(5):1202-1214. PubMed ID: 35188281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of engineered nanomaterials in the construction industry with specific emphasis on paints and their flows in construction and demolition waste in Switzerland.
Hincapié I; Caballero-Guzman A; Hiltbrunner D; Nowack B
Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():398-406. PubMed ID: 26164852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chemical interactions between Nano-ZnO and Nano-TiO2 in a natural aqueous medium.
Tong T; Fang K; Thomas SA; Kelly JJ; Gray KA; Gaillard JF
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7924-32. PubMed ID: 24918623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO(2), ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions.
Gottschalk F; Sonderer T; Scholz RW; Nowack B
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9216-22. PubMed ID: 20000512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comprehensive probabilistic modelling of environmental emissions of engineered nanomaterials.
Sun TY; Gottschalk F; Hungerbühler K; Nowack B
Environ Pollut; 2014 Feb; 185():69-76. PubMed ID: 24220022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Probabilistic material flow analysis of released nano titanium dioxide in Mexico.
Ortiz-Galvez LM; Caballero-Guzman A; Lopes C; Alfaro-Moreno E
NanoImpact; 2024 Jun; 35():100516. PubMed ID: 38838766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic Probabilistic Modeling of Environmental Emissions of Engineered Nanomaterials.
Sun TY; Bornhöft NA; Hungerbühler K; Nowack B
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 May; 50(9):4701-11. PubMed ID: 27043743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined Toxicity of Nano-ZnO and Nano-TiO2: From Single- to Multinanomaterial Systems.
Tong T; Wilke CM; Wu J; Binh CT; Kelly JJ; Gaillard JF; Gray KA
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):8113-23. PubMed ID: 26070110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bio-nano interface and environment: A critical review.
Pulido-Reyes G; Leganes F; Fernández-Piñas F; Rosal R
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Dec; 36(12):3181-3193. PubMed ID: 28731222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
