201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34171135)
21. Importance of exposure dynamics of metal-based nano-ZnO, -Cu and -Pb governing the metabolic potential of soil bacterial communities.
Zhai Y; Hunting ER; Wouterse M; Peijnenburg WJGM; Vijver MG
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2017 Nov; 145():349-358. PubMed ID: 28759764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Envisioning Nano Release Dynamics in a Changing World: Using Dynamic Probabilistic Modeling to Assess Future Environmental Emissions of Engineered Nanomaterials.
Sun TY; Mitrano DM; Bornhöft NA; Scheringer M; Hungerbühler K; Nowack B
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Mar; 51(5):2854-2863. PubMed ID: 28157288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. NanoE-Tox: New and in-depth database concerning ecotoxicity of nanomaterials.
Juganson K; Ivask A; Blinova I; Mortimer M; Kahru A
Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2015; 6():1788-804. PubMed ID: 26425431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Flows of engineered nanomaterials through the recycling process in Switzerland.
Caballero-Guzman A; Sun T; Nowack B
Waste Manag; 2015 Feb; 36():33-43. PubMed ID: 25524750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dynamic probabilistic material flow analysis of nano-SiO
Wang Y; Nowack B
Environ Pollut; 2018 Apr; 235():589-601. PubMed ID: 29331892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Toward an ecotoxicological risk assessment of microplastics: Comparison of available hazard and exposure data in freshwaters.
Adam V; Yang T; Nowack B
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Feb; 38(2):436-447. PubMed ID: 30488983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessing the Risk of Engineered Nanomaterials in the Environment: Development and Application of the nanoFate Model.
Garner KL; Suh S; Keller AA
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 May; 51(10):5541-5551. PubMed ID: 28443660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Meta-analysis of Ecotoxicological Hazard Data for Nanoplastics in Marine and Freshwater Systems.
Yang T; Nowack B
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Dec; 39(12):2588-2598. PubMed ID: 33002218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In silico analysis of nanomaterials hazard and risk.
Cohen Y; Rallo R; Liu R; Liu HH
Acc Chem Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):802-12. PubMed ID: 23138971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A critical evaluation of the fish early-life stage toxicity test for engineered nanomaterials: experimental modifications and recommendations.
Shaw BJ; Liddle CC; Windeatt KM; Handy RD
Arch Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 90(9):2077-2107. PubMed ID: 27318802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Acute effects of TiO2 nanomaterials on the viability and taxonomic composition of aquatic bacterial communities assessed via high-throughput screening and next generation sequencing.
Binh CT; Tong T; Gaillard JF; Gray KA; Kelly JJ
PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e106280. PubMed ID: 25162615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Environmental hazard assessment for polymeric and inorganic nanobiomaterials used in drug delivery.
Hauser M; Li G; Nowack B
J Nanobiotechnology; 2019 Apr; 17(1):56. PubMed ID: 30992030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Engineered nanomaterials in rivers--exposure scenarios for Switzerland at high spatial and temporal resolution.
Gottschalk F; Ort C; Scholz RW; Nowack B
Environ Pollut; 2011 Dec; 159(12):3439-45. PubMed ID: 21890252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Distinguishing Engineered TiO
Bland GD; Battifarano M; Pradas Del Real AE; Sarret G; Lowry GV
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Mar; 56(5):2990-3001. PubMed ID: 35133134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Size-Specific, Dynamic, Probabilistic Material Flow Analysis of Titanium Dioxide Releases into the Environment.
Zheng Y; Nowack B
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Feb; 55(4):2392-2402. PubMed ID: 33541069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Environmental and health effects of nanomaterials in nanotextiles and façade coatings.
Som C; Wick P; Krug H; Nowack B
Environ Int; 2011 Aug; 37(6):1131-42. PubMed ID: 21397331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Lessons learned: Are engineered nanomaterials toxic to terrestrial plants?
Reddy PVL; Hernandez-Viezcas JA; Peralta-Videa JR; Gardea-Torresdey JL
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Oct; 568():470-479. PubMed ID: 27314900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Can photocatalytic and magnetic nanoparticles be a threat to aquatic detrital food webs?
Pradhan A; Fernandes M; Martins PM; Pascoal C; Lanceros-Méndez S; Cássio F
Sci Total Environ; 2021 May; 769():144576. PubMed ID: 33482552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Review on the Environmental Fate Models for Predicting the Distribution of Engineered Nanomaterials in Surface Waters.
Suhendra E; Chang CH; Hou WC; Hsieh YC
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jun; 21(12):. PubMed ID: 32604975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment.
Gottschalk F; Nowack B
J Environ Monit; 2011 May; 13(5):1145-55. PubMed ID: 21387066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
