BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34171648)

  • 1. Using complex network analysis for water quality assessment in large water distribution systems.
    Sitzenfrei R
    Water Res; 2021 Aug; 201():117359. PubMed ID: 34171648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An efficient multi-objective optimization method for water quality sensor placement within water distribution systems considering contamination probability variations.
    He G; Zhang T; Zheng F; Zhang Q
    Water Res; 2018 Oct; 143():165-175. PubMed ID: 29945032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Topological attributes of network resilience: A study in water distribution systems.
    Meng F; Fu G; Farmani R; Sweetapple C; Butler D
    Water Res; 2018 Oct; 143():376-386. PubMed ID: 29986247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using Complex Network Analysis for Optimization of Water Distribution Networks.
    Sitzenfrei R; Wang Q; Kapelan Z; Savić D
    Water Resour Res; 2020 Aug; 56(8):e2020WR027929. PubMed ID: 32999510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deep fuzzy mapping nonparametric model for real-time demand estimation in water distribution systems: A new perspective.
    Zhang Q; Yang J; Zhang W; Kumar M; Liu J; Liu J; Li X
    Water Res; 2023 Aug; 241():120145. PubMed ID: 37270943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Making waves: Applying systems biology principles in water distribution systems engineering.
    Abhijith GR; Ostfeld A
    Water Res; 2022 Jul; 219():118527. PubMed ID: 35567846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the global resilience of water quality sensor placement strategies within water distribution systems.
    Zhang Q; Zheng F; Kapelan Z; Savic D; He G; Ma Y
    Water Res; 2020 Apr; 172():115527. PubMed ID: 32004913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk- and robustness-based solutions to a multi-objective water distribution system rehabilitation problem under uncertainty .
    Kapelan Z; Savic DA; Walters GA; Babayan AV
    Water Sci Technol; 2006; 53(1):61-75. PubMed ID: 16532736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Receiving water quality assessment: comparison between simplified and detailed integrated urban modelling approaches.
    Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(10):2301-12. PubMed ID: 21076216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexible decision-making framework for developing operation protocol for water distribution systems.
    Abhijith GR; Ostfeld A
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 320():115817. PubMed ID: 36056480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Data-driven interval credibility constrained quadratic programming model for water quality management under uncertainty.
    Zhang Q; Li Z
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Sep; 293():112791. PubMed ID: 34089957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of seasonal variation on water quality in tropical water distribution system: is the disease burden significant?
    Etchie AT; Etchie TO; Adewuyi GO; Kannan K; Wate SR; Sivanesan S; Chukwu AU
    Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():186-96. PubMed ID: 24333520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Real-time contamination zoning in water distribution networks for contamination emergencies: a case study.
    Bazargan-Lari MR; Taghipour S; Habibi M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2021 May; 193(6):336. PubMed ID: 33973066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance and reliability analysis of water distribution systems under cascading failures and the identification of crucial pipes.
    Shuang Q; Zhang M; Yuan Y
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88445. PubMed ID: 24551102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of topological, empirical and optimization-based approaches for locating quality detection points in water distribution networks.
    Santonastaso GF; Di Nardo A; Creaco E; Musmarra D; Greco R
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jul; 28(26):33844-33853. PubMed ID: 32851529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of GIS in water distribution system assessment.
    Sargaonkar A; Islam R
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2009 Oct; 51(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 21117426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling.
    Dotto CB; Mannina G; Kleidorfer M; Vezzaro L; Henrichs M; McCarthy DT; Freni G; Rauch W; Deletic A
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2545-58. PubMed ID: 22402270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multi-objective optimization of hydrant flushing in a water distribution system using a fast hybrid technique.
    Shoorangiz M; Nikoo MR; Šimůnek J; Gandomi AH; Adamowski JF; Al-Wardy M
    J Environ Manage; 2023 May; 334():117463. PubMed ID: 36801802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characteristics of iron corrosion scales and water quality variations in drinking water distribution systems of different pipe materials.
    Li M; Liu Z; Chen Y; Hai Y
    Water Res; 2016 Dec; 106():593-603. PubMed ID: 27776308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In-pipe water quality monitoring in water supply systems under steady and unsteady state flow conditions: a quantitative assessment.
    Aisopou A; Stoianov I; Graham NJ
    Water Res; 2012 Jan; 46(1):235-46. PubMed ID: 22094001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.