These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34172123)

  • 1. Bayesian mixture modelling for glass refractive index measurement.
    Wen Z; Curran JM; Harbison SA; Wevers G
    Sci Justice; 2021 Jul; 61(4):345-355. PubMed ID: 34172123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mixed effects modelling for glass category estimation from glass refractive indices.
    Lucy D; Zadora G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Oct; 212(1-3):189-97. PubMed ID: 21724345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advanced in the Forensic Analysis of Glass Fragments with a Focus on Refractive Index and Elemental Analysis.
    Almirall JR; Trejos T
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2006 Jul; 18(2):73-96. PubMed ID: 26247224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the use of refractive index (RI) and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) for the provenance establishment of glass bottles.
    May CD; Watling RJ
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2009; 5(2):66-76. PubMed ID: 19418272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrimination of glass sources using elemental composition and refractive index: development of predictive models.
    Almirall JR; Cole MD; Gettinby G; Furton KG
    Sci Justice; 1998; 38(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 9624818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining a continuous Bayesian approach with grouping information.
    Curran JM; Triggs CM; Buckleton J; Coulson S
    Forensic Sci Int; 1998 Feb; 91(3):181-96. PubMed ID: 9530830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementing statistical learning methods through Bayesian networks. Part 1: a guide to Bayesian parameter estimation using forensic science data.
    Biedermann A; Taroni F; Bozza S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Dec; 193(1-3):63-71. PubMed ID: 19833464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forensic investigation of glass microfragments exposed to heat.
    Vörös T; Takács K; Szabó A; Krizsán A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 May; 334():111265. PubMed ID: 35316775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing transfer probabilities in a Bayesian interpretation of forensic glass evidence.
    Curran JM; Triggs CM; Buckleton JS; Walsh K; Hicks T
    Sci Justice; 1998; 38(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 9624809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Likelihood ratio model for classification of forensic evidence.
    Zadora G; Neocleous T
    Anal Chim Acta; 2009 May; 642(1-2):266-78. PubMed ID: 19427485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Refractive index measurement of the smallest bulk and surface glass microfragments in a model case.
    Vörös T; Takács K
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1948-1955. PubMed ID: 34002862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An interlaboratory study evaluating the interpretation of forensic glass evidence using refractive index measurements and elemental composition.
    Corzo R; Hoffman T; Ernst T; Trejos T; Berman T; Coulson S; Weis P; Stryjnik A; Dorn H; Pollock EC; Workman MS; Jones P; Nytes B; Scholz T; Xie H; Igowsky K; Nelson R; Gates K; Gonzalez J; Voss LM; Almirall J
    Forensic Chem; 2021 Mar; 22():. PubMed ID: 34485765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Bayesian approach for interpreting shoemark evidence in forensic casework: accounting for wear features.
    Skerrett J; Neumann C; Mateos-Garcia I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jul; 210(1-3):26-30. PubMed ID: 21377817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elemental analysis by energy dispersive x-ray: a significant factor in the forensic analysis of glass.
    Reeve V; Mathiesen J; Fong W
    J Forensic Sci; 1976 Apr; 21(2):291-306. PubMed ID: 1262829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of evidence value of glass fragments by likelihood ratio and Bayesian Network approaches.
    Zadora G
    Anal Chim Acta; 2009 May; 642(1-2):279-90. PubMed ID: 19427486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gaussian Mixture Models of Between-Source Variation for Likelihood Ratio Computation from Multivariate Data.
    Franco-Pedroso J; Ramos D; Gonzalez-Rodriguez J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149958. PubMed ID: 26901680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scenario-Entity Analysis based on an entity-relationship model: Revisiting crime reconstruction.
    Wang L; Jia M; Peng C; Ni S; Shen S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109923. PubMed ID: 31437758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Glass fragments from portable electronic devices: Implications for forensic examinations.
    Seyfang KE; Redman KE; Popelka-Filcoff RS; Kirkbride KP
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():442-452. PubMed ID: 26587905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision analysis in forensic science.
    Taroni F; Bozza S; Aitken C
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jul; 50(4):894-905. PubMed ID: 16078494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Dirichlet process mixture of generalized Dirichlet distributions for proportional data modeling.
    Bouguila N; Ziou D
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2010 Jan; 21(1):107-22. PubMed ID: 19963696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.