133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34172299)
21. Comparison of the GlideScope Cobalt® and Storz DCI® Video Laryngoscopes in Children Younger Than 2 Years of Age During Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Trainee Evaluation Study.
Vadi MG; Roddy KJ; Ghazal EA; Um M; Neiheisel AJ; Applegate RL
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2017 Jul; 33(7):467-473. PubMed ID: 26785097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Forum. An evaluation of the levering laryngoscope.
Tuckey JP; Cook TM; Render CA
Anaesthesia; 1996 Jan; 51(1):71-3. PubMed ID: 8669571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparative trial of the GlideScope(R) video laryngoscope to direct laryngoscope in children with difficult direct laryngoscopy and an evaluation of the effect of blade size.
Lee JH; Park YH; Byon HJ; Han WK; Kim HS; Kim CS; Kim JT
Anesth Analg; 2013 Jul; 117(1):176-81. PubMed ID: 23687227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The midline approach for endotracheal intubation using GlideScope video laryngoscopy could provide better glottis exposure in adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Jiang L; Qiu S; Zhang P; Yao W; Chang Y; Dai Z
BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):200. PubMed ID: 31690285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Direct laryngoscopy or C-MAC video laryngoscopy? Routine tracheal intubation in patients undergoing ENT surgery].
Meininger D; Strouhal U; Weber CF; Fogl D; Holzer L; Zacharowski K; Byhahn C
Anaesthesist; 2010 Sep; 59(9):806-11. PubMed ID: 20703441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison between the GlideScope® classic and GlideScope® direct video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation.
Heuer JF; Heitmann S; Crozier TA; Bleckmann A; Quintel M; Russo SG
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():330-6. PubMed ID: 27555188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Pentax-AWS((R)) rigid indirect video laryngoscope: clinical assessment of performance in 320 cases.
Suzuki A; Toyama Y; Katsumi N; Kunisawa T; Sasaki R; Hirota K; Henderson JJ; Iwasaki H
Anaesthesia; 2008 Jun; 63(6):641-7. PubMed ID: 18477277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Usefulness of video laryngoscopy in tracheal intubation at thyroid surgical position for intraoperative neuromonitoring.
Won D; Lee JM; Lee J; Chai YJ; Hwang JY; Kim TK; Chang JE; Kim H; Kim MJ; Min SW
Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4980. PubMed ID: 38424153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Airway risk factors for the Miller laryngoscope blade.
Landry WB; Nossaman BD
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():62-7. PubMed ID: 27555135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Technical factors associated with first-pass success during endotracheal intubation in children: analysis of videolaryngoscopy recordings.
Miller KA; Monuteaux MC; Nagler J
Emerg Med J; 2021 Feb; 38(2):125-131. PubMed ID: 33172879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of the AMBU ISCOPE and Macintosh laryngoscopes: first experience with a new device for tracheal intubation: a manikin study.
Vedel AG; Rasmussen LS
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Apr; 30(4):175-9. PubMed ID: 23426132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing Direct and Video Laryngoscopy Skills Between Resident and Attending Emergency Physicians.
Kei J; Mebust DP
Perm J; 2023 Sep; 27(3):22-29. PubMed ID: 37231774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.
Mosier J; Chiu S; Patanwala AE; Sakles JC
Ann Emerg Med; 2013 Apr; 61(4):414-420.e1. PubMed ID: 23374414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of the Macintosh curved blade size on direct laryngoscopic view in edentulous patients.
Kim H; Chang JE; Han SH; Lee JM; Yoon S; Hwang JY
Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan; 36(1):120-123. PubMed ID: 28974373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Video laryngoscopy improves intubation success and reduces esophageal intubations compared to direct laryngoscopy in the medical intensive care unit.
Mosier JM; Whitmore SP; Bloom JW; Snyder LS; Graham LA; Carr GE; Sakles JC
Crit Care; 2013 Oct; 17(5):R237. PubMed ID: 24125064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of the STORZ video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy for intubation in the Pediatric airway--a randomized clinical trial.
Vlatten A; Aucoin S; Litz S; Macmanus B; Soder C
Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Nov; 19(11):1102-7. PubMed ID: 19708910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Cormack Lehane Grading System and Intubation Difficulty Score in Patients Intubated by D-Blade Video and Direct Macintosh Laryngoscope: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Pažur I; Maldini B; Hostić V; Ožegić O; Obraz M
Acta Clin Croat; 2016 Dec; 55(4):560-564. PubMed ID: 29117475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of three video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy for emergency endotracheal intubation: a retrospective cohort study.
Suzuki K; Kusunoki S; Tanigawa K; Shime N
BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e024927. PubMed ID: 30928937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy, intra- and inter-rater reliability of three scoring systems for the glottic view at videolaryngoscopy.
O'Loughlin EJ; Swann AD; English JD; Ramadas R
Anaesthesia; 2017 Jul; 72(7):835-839. PubMed ID: 28337769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. View of the larynx obtained using the Miller blade and paraglossal approach, compared to that with the Macintosh blade.
Achen B; Terblanche OC; Finucane BT
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2008 Sep; 36(5):717-21. PubMed ID: 18853593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
