These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34172348)
1. Can the use of deception be justified in medical education research? A point/counterpoint and case study. Maxfield CM; Thorpe MP; Desser TS; Heitkamp D; Hull NC; Koontz NA; Welch TJ; Grimm LJ Acad Radiol; 2022 Jul; 29(7):1091-1094. PubMed ID: 34172348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The unique ethical challenges of the bogus pipeline methodology: let the data speak. Aguinis H; Handelsman MM J Appl Soc Psychol; 1997 Apr; 27(7):582-7. PubMed ID: 14627018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deception in medical and behavioral research: is it ever acceptable? Wendler D Milbank Q; 1996; 74(1):87-114. PubMed ID: 8596525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deception in psychology: moral costs and benefits of unsought self-knowledge. Bortolotti L; Mameli M Account Res; 2006; 13(3):259-75. PubMed ID: 17124761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Debriefing and accountability in deceptive research. Miller FG; Gluck JP; Wendler D Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2008 Sep; 18(3):235-51. PubMed ID: 18935922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The ubiquity of deception and the ethics of deceptive research. Benham B Bioethics; 2008 Mar; 22(3):147-56. PubMed ID: 18257801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical considerations in social psychological research: is the bogus pipeline a special case? Sigall H J Appl Soc Psychol; 1997 Apr; 27(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 14627019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deception in research: distinctions and solutions from the perspective of utilitarianism. Pittenger DJ Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(2):117-42. PubMed ID: 12956136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detention and deception: limits of ethical acceptability in detention research. Minas IH Monash Bioeth Rev; 2004 Oct; 23(4):69-77. PubMed ID: 15688513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research. American Society of Clinical Oncology J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conducting research on academic dishonesty. Forsyth DR; Rubin Z Ethics Behav; 2001; 11(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 11706847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Detecting Deception in Our Research Participants: Are Your Participants Who You Think They Are? McCaul ME; Wand GS Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2018 Feb; 42(2):230-237. PubMed ID: 29286543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A confederate's perspective on deception. Oliansky A Ethics Behav; 1991; 1(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 11651141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Guidelines for the Responsible Use of Deception in Simulation: Ethical and Educational Considerations. Calhoun AW; Pian-Smith M; Shah A; Levine A; Gaba D; DeMaria S; Goldberg A; Meyer EC Simul Healthc; 2020 Aug; 15(4):282-288. PubMed ID: 32776776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deception of children in research. Spriggs M; Gillam L J Med Ethics; 2015 Feb; 41(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 24307618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deception methods in psychology: have they changed in 23 years? Sieber JE; Iannuzzo R; Rodriguez B Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(1):67-85. PubMed ID: 11654171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]